Cargando…

A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation is usually facilitated by using a muscle relaxant to supplement drugs given for the induction of general anesthesia. Nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are also associated with the few disadvantages. Endotracheal intubation under volatile anesthetics without the use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asif, Mohammad, Guntreddy, Aman Sai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283181
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_95_18
_version_ 1783358235681488896
author Asif, Mohammad
Guntreddy, Aman Sai
author_facet Asif, Mohammad
Guntreddy, Aman Sai
author_sort Asif, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation is usually facilitated by using a muscle relaxant to supplement drugs given for the induction of general anesthesia. Nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are also associated with the few disadvantages. Endotracheal intubation under volatile anesthetics without the use of muscle relaxants is possible, but it has disadvantages. Time available for intubation is much less when compared to the use of muscle relaxants. Considering the disadvantages of muscle relaxants and volatile agents in mind, there is a need for endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of different doses of propofol for tracheal intubation – a randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized study was conducted on 80 patients, comprising of 40 patients each. Patients of either sex were randomly allocated into Group P1 and Group P2 by computer-generated random numbers where Group P1 received 2 mg/kg propofol +3 μg/kg fentanyl and Group P2 received 4 mg/kg propofol +3 μg/kg fentanyl. SpO(2), heart rate, blood pressure (BP)- systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure were recorded at 1 and 3 min after administration of study drugs were recorded. Intubating conditions were assessed modified Helbo–Hansen scoring system. RESULTS: The success rate of endotracheal intubation was 62.5% and 95% in propofol 2 mg/kg + fentanyl 3 μg/kg and propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg, respectively. The total incidence of hypotension was 40% and 83% in propofol 2 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg and propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg, respectively. The incidence of hypersensitivity was noted only in propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg group and was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that endotracheal intubation is possible in premedicated adult American Society of Anesthesiologists by Grade I patients with receiving 3 μg/kg Fentanyl + 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg propofol for induction without muscle relaxants, and the intubating conditions are acceptable. We found that propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg is the optimal dose required for intubation without the use of muscle relaxants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61572142018-10-03 A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial Asif, Mohammad Guntreddy, Aman Sai Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation is usually facilitated by using a muscle relaxant to supplement drugs given for the induction of general anesthesia. Nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are also associated with the few disadvantages. Endotracheal intubation under volatile anesthetics without the use of muscle relaxants is possible, but it has disadvantages. Time available for intubation is much less when compared to the use of muscle relaxants. Considering the disadvantages of muscle relaxants and volatile agents in mind, there is a need for endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of different doses of propofol for tracheal intubation – a randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized study was conducted on 80 patients, comprising of 40 patients each. Patients of either sex were randomly allocated into Group P1 and Group P2 by computer-generated random numbers where Group P1 received 2 mg/kg propofol +3 μg/kg fentanyl and Group P2 received 4 mg/kg propofol +3 μg/kg fentanyl. SpO(2), heart rate, blood pressure (BP)- systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure were recorded at 1 and 3 min after administration of study drugs were recorded. Intubating conditions were assessed modified Helbo–Hansen scoring system. RESULTS: The success rate of endotracheal intubation was 62.5% and 95% in propofol 2 mg/kg + fentanyl 3 μg/kg and propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg, respectively. The total incidence of hypotension was 40% and 83% in propofol 2 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg and propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg, respectively. The incidence of hypersensitivity was noted only in propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg group and was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that endotracheal intubation is possible in premedicated adult American Society of Anesthesiologists by Grade I patients with receiving 3 μg/kg Fentanyl + 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg propofol for induction without muscle relaxants, and the intubating conditions are acceptable. We found that propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg is the optimal dose required for intubation without the use of muscle relaxants. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6157214/ /pubmed/30283181 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_95_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Asif, Mohammad
Guntreddy, Aman Sai
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Different Doses of Propofol for Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort study to assess the efficacy of different doses of propofol for tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283181
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_95_18
work_keys_str_mv AT asifmohammad astudytoassesstheefficacyofdifferentdosesofpropofolfortrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT guntreddyamansai astudytoassesstheefficacyofdifferentdosesofpropofolfortrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT asifmohammad studytoassesstheefficacyofdifferentdosesofpropofolfortrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT guntreddyamansai studytoassesstheefficacyofdifferentdosesofpropofolfortrachealintubationarandomizedclinicaltrial