Cargando…

Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Caudal block is the most commonly used regional anesthetic technique in pediatric surgeries; different additives have been used for better and safer outcome. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine versus u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Passaint Fahim, Hassan, Amany Saleh, Elmetwally, Sarah Abdelsalam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283169
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_77_18
_version_ 1783358241417199616
author Hassan, Passaint Fahim
Hassan, Amany Saleh
Elmetwally, Sarah Abdelsalam
author_facet Hassan, Passaint Fahim
Hassan, Amany Saleh
Elmetwally, Sarah Abdelsalam
author_sort Hassan, Passaint Fahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caudal block is the most commonly used regional anesthetic technique in pediatric surgeries; different additives have been used for better and safer outcome. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine versus using each agent solely with bupivacaine in pediatric caudal block as regards their efficiency in pain relief (the duration of postoperative analgesia, first time to request analgesia, and modified objective pain score [MOPS]). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients and Methods: Sixty-three children scheduled for hypospadias surgery wererandomized into three groupsaccording to the adjuvant drug added to caudal bupivacaine : Group I (n = 21): dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg + 0.5 mg/kg bupivacaine 0.25%, Group II (n = 21): dexmedetomidine0.01 μg/kg + 0.5 mg/kg bupivacaine 0.25% and Group III (n = 21): dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg + dexmedetomidine 0.01 μg/kg + 0.5 mg/kgbupivacaine 0.25%. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics were recorded. In postoperative anesthesia care unit and then the ward, MOPS and sedation score were recorded at 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 h. Further, the time of first analgesic request and side effects were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Categorical data were presented as frequencies (%) and analyzed using Chi-square test. Continuous data were presented as mean (standard deviation) and median (quartiles). Continuous data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance for single measures and two-way mixed model for repeated measures. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed for the duration of analgesia. RESULTS: In Group III, MOPS was lower than Groups I and II at the study times. Further, Group III had prolonged time for first request of analgesic. Sedation scores were prolonged in Group III and Group II than in Group I. There was a reduction in heart rates in Group III more than Group I and Group II but with no significant difference. However, there was a significant reduction in mean arterial blood pressure 30 min intraoperatively and postoperatively in Group III as compared to Groups I and II. CONCLUSION: The addition of combined dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 μg/kg and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg to caudal bupivacaine seemed to be an attractive alternative to each drug if used alone with more prolonged analgesia and almost no adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61572382018-10-03 Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study Hassan, Passaint Fahim Hassan, Amany Saleh Elmetwally, Sarah Abdelsalam Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Caudal block is the most commonly used regional anesthetic technique in pediatric surgeries; different additives have been used for better and safer outcome. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine versus using each agent solely with bupivacaine in pediatric caudal block as regards their efficiency in pain relief (the duration of postoperative analgesia, first time to request analgesia, and modified objective pain score [MOPS]). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients and Methods: Sixty-three children scheduled for hypospadias surgery wererandomized into three groupsaccording to the adjuvant drug added to caudal bupivacaine : Group I (n = 21): dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg + 0.5 mg/kg bupivacaine 0.25%, Group II (n = 21): dexmedetomidine0.01 μg/kg + 0.5 mg/kg bupivacaine 0.25% and Group III (n = 21): dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg + dexmedetomidine 0.01 μg/kg + 0.5 mg/kgbupivacaine 0.25%. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics were recorded. In postoperative anesthesia care unit and then the ward, MOPS and sedation score were recorded at 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 h. Further, the time of first analgesic request and side effects were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Categorical data were presented as frequencies (%) and analyzed using Chi-square test. Continuous data were presented as mean (standard deviation) and median (quartiles). Continuous data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance for single measures and two-way mixed model for repeated measures. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed for the duration of analgesia. RESULTS: In Group III, MOPS was lower than Groups I and II at the study times. Further, Group III had prolonged time for first request of analgesic. Sedation scores were prolonged in Group III and Group II than in Group I. There was a reduction in heart rates in Group III more than Group I and Group II but with no significant difference. However, there was a significant reduction in mean arterial blood pressure 30 min intraoperatively and postoperatively in Group III as compared to Groups I and II. CONCLUSION: The addition of combined dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 μg/kg and dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg to caudal bupivacaine seemed to be an attractive alternative to each drug if used alone with more prolonged analgesia and almost no adverse effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6157238/ /pubmed/30283169 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_77_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hassan, Passaint Fahim
Hassan, Amany Saleh
Elmetwally, Sarah Abdelsalam
Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study
title Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study
title_full Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study
title_fullStr Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study
title_short Caudal Analgesia for Hypospadias in Pediatrics: Comparative Evaluation of Adjuvants Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine Combination versus Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparative Study
title_sort caudal analgesia for hypospadias in pediatrics: comparative evaluation of adjuvants dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine combination versus dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283169
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_77_18
work_keys_str_mv AT hassanpassaintfahim caudalanalgesiaforhypospadiasinpediatricscomparativeevaluationofadjuvantsdexamethasoneanddexmedetomidinecombinationversusdexamethasoneordexmedetomidinetobupivacaineaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT hassanamanysaleh caudalanalgesiaforhypospadiasinpediatricscomparativeevaluationofadjuvantsdexamethasoneanddexmedetomidinecombinationversusdexamethasoneordexmedetomidinetobupivacaineaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcomparativestudy
AT elmetwallysarahabdelsalam caudalanalgesiaforhypospadiasinpediatricscomparativeevaluationofadjuvantsdexamethasoneanddexmedetomidinecombinationversusdexamethasoneordexmedetomidinetobupivacaineaprospectivedoubleblindedrandomizedcomparativestudy