Cargando…
Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Purpose: To explore in a small pilot study whether oral melatonin, administered during ovarian stimulation increases clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after IVF and what dose might be most effective. Methods: Pilot double-blind, dose-finding, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial in private IVF c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00545 |
_version_ | 1783358256824975360 |
---|---|
author | Fernando, Shavi Wallace, Euan Morrison Vollenhoven, Beverley Lolatgis, Nicholas Hope, Nicole Wong, Melissa Lawrence, Mark Lawrence, Anthony Russell, Chris Leong, Kenneth Thomas, Philip Rombauts, Luk |
author_facet | Fernando, Shavi Wallace, Euan Morrison Vollenhoven, Beverley Lolatgis, Nicholas Hope, Nicole Wong, Melissa Lawrence, Mark Lawrence, Anthony Russell, Chris Leong, Kenneth Thomas, Philip Rombauts, Luk |
author_sort | Fernando, Shavi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To explore in a small pilot study whether oral melatonin, administered during ovarian stimulation increases clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after IVF and what dose might be most effective. Methods: Pilot double-blind, dose-finding, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial in private IVF clinics in Australia between September 2014 and September 2016. One hundred and sixty women having their first cycle of IVF or ICSI were randomized to receive placebo (n = 40), melatonin 2 mg (n = 41), melatonin 4 mg (n = 39), or melatonin 8 mg (n = 40) twice per day (BD) during ovarian stimulation. The primary outcome was CPR. Secondary outcomes included serum and follicular fluid (FF) melatonin concentrations, oocyte/embryo quantity/quality, and live birth rate (LBR). Analysis was performed using the intention-to-treat principle. Results: There was no difference in CPR or LBR between any of the four groups (p = 0.5). When all the doses of melatonin were compared as a group with placebo, the CPR was 21.7% for the former and 15.0% for the latter [OR 1.57 (95% CI 0.59, 4.14), p = 0.4]. There were also no differences between the groups in total oocyte number, number of MII oocytes, number of fertilized oocytes, or the number or quality of embryos between the groups. This is despite mean FF melatonin concentration in the highest dose group (8 mg BD) being nine-fold higher compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in CPR or oocyte and embryo parameters despite finding a nine-fold increase in FF melatonin concentration. However, this study was not sufficiently powered to assess differences in CPR and therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Because this was a small RCT, a beneficial effect of melatonin on IVF pregnancy rates cannot be excluded and merits confirmation in further, larger clinical trials. ANZCTR (http://www.anzctr.org.au/ Project ID: ACTRN12613001317785). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6157331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61573312018-10-03 Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Fernando, Shavi Wallace, Euan Morrison Vollenhoven, Beverley Lolatgis, Nicholas Hope, Nicole Wong, Melissa Lawrence, Mark Lawrence, Anthony Russell, Chris Leong, Kenneth Thomas, Philip Rombauts, Luk Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Purpose: To explore in a small pilot study whether oral melatonin, administered during ovarian stimulation increases clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after IVF and what dose might be most effective. Methods: Pilot double-blind, dose-finding, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial in private IVF clinics in Australia between September 2014 and September 2016. One hundred and sixty women having their first cycle of IVF or ICSI were randomized to receive placebo (n = 40), melatonin 2 mg (n = 41), melatonin 4 mg (n = 39), or melatonin 8 mg (n = 40) twice per day (BD) during ovarian stimulation. The primary outcome was CPR. Secondary outcomes included serum and follicular fluid (FF) melatonin concentrations, oocyte/embryo quantity/quality, and live birth rate (LBR). Analysis was performed using the intention-to-treat principle. Results: There was no difference in CPR or LBR between any of the four groups (p = 0.5). When all the doses of melatonin were compared as a group with placebo, the CPR was 21.7% for the former and 15.0% for the latter [OR 1.57 (95% CI 0.59, 4.14), p = 0.4]. There were also no differences between the groups in total oocyte number, number of MII oocytes, number of fertilized oocytes, or the number or quality of embryos between the groups. This is despite mean FF melatonin concentration in the highest dose group (8 mg BD) being nine-fold higher compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in CPR or oocyte and embryo parameters despite finding a nine-fold increase in FF melatonin concentration. However, this study was not sufficiently powered to assess differences in CPR and therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution. Because this was a small RCT, a beneficial effect of melatonin on IVF pregnancy rates cannot be excluded and merits confirmation in further, larger clinical trials. ANZCTR (http://www.anzctr.org.au/ Project ID: ACTRN12613001317785). Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6157331/ /pubmed/30283403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00545 Text en Copyright © 2018 Fernando, Wallace, Vollenhoven, Lolatgis, Hope, Wong, Lawrence, Lawrence, Russell, Leong, Thomas and Rombauts. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Fernando, Shavi Wallace, Euan Morrison Vollenhoven, Beverley Lolatgis, Nicholas Hope, Nicole Wong, Melissa Lawrence, Mark Lawrence, Anthony Russell, Chris Leong, Kenneth Thomas, Philip Rombauts, Luk Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
title | Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full | Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_short | Melatonin in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_sort | melatonin in assisted reproductive technology: a pilot double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283403 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandoshavi melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT wallaceeuanmorrison melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT vollenhovenbeverley melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT lolatgisnicholas melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT hopenicole melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT wongmelissa melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT lawrencemark melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT lawrenceanthony melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT russellchris melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT leongkenneth melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT thomasphilip melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial AT rombautsluk melatonininassistedreproductivetechnologyapilotdoubleblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrial |