Cargando…

Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load

OBJECTIVES: The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blecha, Sebastian, Brandstetter, Susanne, Dodoo-Schittko, Frank, Brandl, Magdalena, Graf, Bernhard M, Bein, Thomas, Apfelbacher, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30249633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166
_version_ 1783358282109288448
author Blecha, Sebastian
Brandstetter, Susanne
Dodoo-Schittko, Frank
Brandl, Magdalena
Graf, Bernhard M
Bein, Thomas
Apfelbacher, Christian
author_facet Blecha, Sebastian
Brandstetter, Susanne
Dodoo-Schittko, Frank
Brandl, Magdalena
Graf, Bernhard M
Bein, Thomas
Apfelbacher, Christian
author_sort Blecha, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating research personnels by assessing attitudes, experiences and workload associated with the conduct of the DACAPO study. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective anonymous online survey was sent via email account to 169 participants in 65 study centres. The questionnaire included six different domains: (1) training for performing the study; (2) obtaining informed consent; (3) data collection; (4) data entry using the online documentation system; (5) opinion towards the study and (6) personal data. Descriptive data analysis was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 78 participants took part (46%) in the survey, 75 questionnaires (44%) could be evaluated. 51% were senior medical specialists. 95% considered the time frame of the training as appropriate and the presentation was rated by 93% as good or very good. Time effort for obtaining consent, data collection and entry was considered by 41% as a burden. Support from the coordinating study centre was rated as good or very good by more than 90% of respondents. While the DACAPO study was seen as scientifically relevant by 81%, only 45% considered the study results valuable for improving patient care significantly. CONCLUSION: Collecting feedback on the acceptability of a large multicentre healthcare research study provided important insights. Recruitment and data acquisition was mainly performed by physicians and often regarded as additional time burden in clinical practice. Reducing the amount of data collection and simplifying data entry could facilitate the conduct of healthcare research studies and could improve motivation of researchers in intensive care medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02637011; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61575222018-09-28 Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load Blecha, Sebastian Brandstetter, Susanne Dodoo-Schittko, Frank Brandl, Magdalena Graf, Bernhard M Bein, Thomas Apfelbacher, Christian BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating research personnels by assessing attitudes, experiences and workload associated with the conduct of the DACAPO study. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective anonymous online survey was sent via email account to 169 participants in 65 study centres. The questionnaire included six different domains: (1) training for performing the study; (2) obtaining informed consent; (3) data collection; (4) data entry using the online documentation system; (5) opinion towards the study and (6) personal data. Descriptive data analysis was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 78 participants took part (46%) in the survey, 75 questionnaires (44%) could be evaluated. 51% were senior medical specialists. 95% considered the time frame of the training as appropriate and the presentation was rated by 93% as good or very good. Time effort for obtaining consent, data collection and entry was considered by 41% as a burden. Support from the coordinating study centre was rated as good or very good by more than 90% of respondents. While the DACAPO study was seen as scientifically relevant by 81%, only 45% considered the study results valuable for improving patient care significantly. CONCLUSION: Collecting feedback on the acceptability of a large multicentre healthcare research study provided important insights. Recruitment and data acquisition was mainly performed by physicians and often regarded as additional time burden in clinical practice. Reducing the amount of data collection and simplifying data entry could facilitate the conduct of healthcare research studies and could improve motivation of researchers in intensive care medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02637011; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6157522/ /pubmed/30249633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Blecha, Sebastian
Brandstetter, Susanne
Dodoo-Schittko, Frank
Brandl, Magdalena
Graf, Bernhard M
Bein, Thomas
Apfelbacher, Christian
Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
title Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
title_full Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
title_fullStr Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
title_short Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
title_sort acceptability of a german multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30249633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166
work_keys_str_mv AT blechasebastian acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload
AT brandstettersusanne acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload
AT dodooschittkofrank acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload
AT brandlmagdalena acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload
AT grafbernhardm acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload
AT beinthomas acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload
AT apfelbacherchristian acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload