Cargando…
Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load
OBJECTIVES: The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30249633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166 |
_version_ | 1783358282109288448 |
---|---|
author | Blecha, Sebastian Brandstetter, Susanne Dodoo-Schittko, Frank Brandl, Magdalena Graf, Bernhard M Bein, Thomas Apfelbacher, Christian |
author_facet | Blecha, Sebastian Brandstetter, Susanne Dodoo-Schittko, Frank Brandl, Magdalena Graf, Bernhard M Bein, Thomas Apfelbacher, Christian |
author_sort | Blecha, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating research personnels by assessing attitudes, experiences and workload associated with the conduct of the DACAPO study. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective anonymous online survey was sent via email account to 169 participants in 65 study centres. The questionnaire included six different domains: (1) training for performing the study; (2) obtaining informed consent; (3) data collection; (4) data entry using the online documentation system; (5) opinion towards the study and (6) personal data. Descriptive data analysis was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 78 participants took part (46%) in the survey, 75 questionnaires (44%) could be evaluated. 51% were senior medical specialists. 95% considered the time frame of the training as appropriate and the presentation was rated by 93% as good or very good. Time effort for obtaining consent, data collection and entry was considered by 41% as a burden. Support from the coordinating study centre was rated as good or very good by more than 90% of respondents. While the DACAPO study was seen as scientifically relevant by 81%, only 45% considered the study results valuable for improving patient care significantly. CONCLUSION: Collecting feedback on the acceptability of a large multicentre healthcare research study provided important insights. Recruitment and data acquisition was mainly performed by physicians and often regarded as additional time burden in clinical practice. Reducing the amount of data collection and simplifying data entry could facilitate the conduct of healthcare research studies and could improve motivation of researchers in intensive care medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02637011; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6157522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61575222018-09-28 Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load Blecha, Sebastian Brandstetter, Susanne Dodoo-Schittko, Frank Brandl, Magdalena Graf, Bernhard M Bein, Thomas Apfelbacher, Christian BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating research personnels by assessing attitudes, experiences and workload associated with the conduct of the DACAPO study. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective anonymous online survey was sent via email account to 169 participants in 65 study centres. The questionnaire included six different domains: (1) training for performing the study; (2) obtaining informed consent; (3) data collection; (4) data entry using the online documentation system; (5) opinion towards the study and (6) personal data. Descriptive data analysis was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 78 participants took part (46%) in the survey, 75 questionnaires (44%) could be evaluated. 51% were senior medical specialists. 95% considered the time frame of the training as appropriate and the presentation was rated by 93% as good or very good. Time effort for obtaining consent, data collection and entry was considered by 41% as a burden. Support from the coordinating study centre was rated as good or very good by more than 90% of respondents. While the DACAPO study was seen as scientifically relevant by 81%, only 45% considered the study results valuable for improving patient care significantly. CONCLUSION: Collecting feedback on the acceptability of a large multicentre healthcare research study provided important insights. Recruitment and data acquisition was mainly performed by physicians and often regarded as additional time burden in clinical practice. Reducing the amount of data collection and simplifying data entry could facilitate the conduct of healthcare research studies and could improve motivation of researchers in intensive care medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02637011; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6157522/ /pubmed/30249633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Blecha, Sebastian Brandstetter, Susanne Dodoo-Schittko, Frank Brandl, Magdalena Graf, Bernhard M Bein, Thomas Apfelbacher, Christian Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
title | Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
title_full | Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
title_fullStr | Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
title_full_unstemmed | Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
title_short | Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
title_sort | acceptability of a german multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30249633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blechasebastian acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload AT brandstettersusanne acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload AT dodooschittkofrank acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload AT brandlmagdalena acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload AT grafbernhardm acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload AT beinthomas acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload AT apfelbacherchristian acceptabilityofagermanmulticentrehealthcareresearchstudyasurveyofresearchpersonnelsattitudesexperiencesandworkload |