Cargando…
Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities
AIM: The present study utilizes perceptual hysteresis effects to compare the ambiguity of Mona Lisa’s emotional face expression (high-level ambiguity) and of geometric cube stimuli (low-level ambiguity). METHODS: In two experiments we presented series of nine Mona Lisa variants and nine cube variant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202398 |
_version_ | 1783358333098393600 |
---|---|
author | Liaci, Emanuela Fischer, Andreas Atmanspacher, Harald Heinrichs, Markus Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Kornmeier, Jürgen |
author_facet | Liaci, Emanuela Fischer, Andreas Atmanspacher, Harald Heinrichs, Markus Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Kornmeier, Jürgen |
author_sort | Liaci, Emanuela |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The present study utilizes perceptual hysteresis effects to compare the ambiguity of Mona Lisa’s emotional face expression (high-level ambiguity) and of geometric cube stimuli (low-level ambiguity). METHODS: In two experiments we presented series of nine Mona Lisa variants and nine cube variants. Stimulus ambiguity was manipulated by changing Mona Lisa’s mouth curvature (Exp. 1) and the cubes’ back-layer luminance (Exp. 2). Each experiment consisted of three conditions, two with opposite stimulus presentation sequences with increasing and decreasing degrees of ambiguity, respectively, and a third condition with a random presentation sequence. Participants indicated happy or sad face percepts (Exp. 1) and alternative 3D cube percepts (Exp. 2) by key presses. We studied the influences of a priori perceptual biases (long-term memory) and presentation order (short-term memory) on perception. RESULTS: Perception followed sigmoidal functions of the stimulus ambiguity morphing parameters. The morphing parameter for the functions’ inflection points depended strongly on stimulus presentation order with similar effect sizes but different signs for the two stimulus types (positive hysteresis / priming for the cubes; negative hysteresis / adaptation for Mona Lisa). In the random conditions, the inflection points were located in the middle between those from the two directional conditions for the Mona Lisa stimuli. For the cube stimuli, they were superimposed on one sigmoidal function for the ordered condition. DISCUSSION: The hysteresis effects reflect the influence of short-term memory during the perceptual disambiguation of ambiguous sensory information. The effects for the two stimulus types are of similar size, explaining up to 34% of the perceptual variance introduced by the paradigm. We explain the qualitative difference between positive and negative hysteresis with adaptation for Mona Lisa and with priming for the cubes. In addition, the hysteresis paradigm allows a quantitative determination of the impact of adaptation and priming during the resolution of perceptual ambiguities. The asymmetric shifts of inflection points in the case of the cube stimuli is likely due to an a priori perceptual bias, reflecting an influence of long-term memory. Whether corresponding influences also exist for the Mona Lisa variants is so far unclear. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6157843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61578432018-10-19 Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities Liaci, Emanuela Fischer, Andreas Atmanspacher, Harald Heinrichs, Markus Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Kornmeier, Jürgen PLoS One Research Article AIM: The present study utilizes perceptual hysteresis effects to compare the ambiguity of Mona Lisa’s emotional face expression (high-level ambiguity) and of geometric cube stimuli (low-level ambiguity). METHODS: In two experiments we presented series of nine Mona Lisa variants and nine cube variants. Stimulus ambiguity was manipulated by changing Mona Lisa’s mouth curvature (Exp. 1) and the cubes’ back-layer luminance (Exp. 2). Each experiment consisted of three conditions, two with opposite stimulus presentation sequences with increasing and decreasing degrees of ambiguity, respectively, and a third condition with a random presentation sequence. Participants indicated happy or sad face percepts (Exp. 1) and alternative 3D cube percepts (Exp. 2) by key presses. We studied the influences of a priori perceptual biases (long-term memory) and presentation order (short-term memory) on perception. RESULTS: Perception followed sigmoidal functions of the stimulus ambiguity morphing parameters. The morphing parameter for the functions’ inflection points depended strongly on stimulus presentation order with similar effect sizes but different signs for the two stimulus types (positive hysteresis / priming for the cubes; negative hysteresis / adaptation for Mona Lisa). In the random conditions, the inflection points were located in the middle between those from the two directional conditions for the Mona Lisa stimuli. For the cube stimuli, they were superimposed on one sigmoidal function for the ordered condition. DISCUSSION: The hysteresis effects reflect the influence of short-term memory during the perceptual disambiguation of ambiguous sensory information. The effects for the two stimulus types are of similar size, explaining up to 34% of the perceptual variance introduced by the paradigm. We explain the qualitative difference between positive and negative hysteresis with adaptation for Mona Lisa and with priming for the cubes. In addition, the hysteresis paradigm allows a quantitative determination of the impact of adaptation and priming during the resolution of perceptual ambiguities. The asymmetric shifts of inflection points in the case of the cube stimuli is likely due to an a priori perceptual bias, reflecting an influence of long-term memory. Whether corresponding influences also exist for the Mona Lisa variants is so far unclear. Public Library of Science 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6157843/ /pubmed/30256789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202398 Text en © 2018 Liaci et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liaci, Emanuela Fischer, Andreas Atmanspacher, Harald Heinrichs, Markus Tebartz van Elst, Ludger Kornmeier, Jürgen Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
title | Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
title_full | Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
title_fullStr | Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
title_short | Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
title_sort | positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liaciemanuela positiveandnegativehysteresiseffectsfortheperceptionofgeometricandemotionalambiguities AT fischerandreas positiveandnegativehysteresiseffectsfortheperceptionofgeometricandemotionalambiguities AT atmanspacherharald positiveandnegativehysteresiseffectsfortheperceptionofgeometricandemotionalambiguities AT heinrichsmarkus positiveandnegativehysteresiseffectsfortheperceptionofgeometricandemotionalambiguities AT tebartzvanelstludger positiveandnegativehysteresiseffectsfortheperceptionofgeometricandemotionalambiguities AT kornmeierjurgen positiveandnegativehysteresiseffectsfortheperceptionofgeometricandemotionalambiguities |