Cargando…

Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study

INTRODUCTION: Following a period of interruption of Gavi’s funds for health system strengthening (HSS) in Cameroon and Chad, the two countries reprogramed their HSS grants. To implement the reprogrammed HSS, Chad committed to better management of the funds. Cameroon chose to channel the HSS funds th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Bcheraoui, Charbel, Miangotar, Yodé, Daoud, Farah, Squire, Ellen, Mimche, Honoré
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203647
_version_ 1783358334757240832
author El Bcheraoui, Charbel
Miangotar, Yodé
Daoud, Farah
Squire, Ellen
Mimche, Honoré
author_facet El Bcheraoui, Charbel
Miangotar, Yodé
Daoud, Farah
Squire, Ellen
Mimche, Honoré
author_sort El Bcheraoui, Charbel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Following a period of interruption of Gavi’s funds for health system strengthening (HSS) in Cameroon and Chad, the two countries reprogramed their HSS grants. To implement the reprogrammed HSS, Chad committed to better management of the funds. Cameroon chose to channel the HSS funds through one of the health partners. This process is new to Gavi’s HSS grants, and little is known about its effectiveness or characteristics. We investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this process to inform the global health community about the added value of this solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated Gavi’s HSS programs in Cameroon and Chad through a mixed methodology. To explore the pros and cons of channeling the funds through a health partner, we triangulated data from document review, key informant interviews (KIIs), field visits, and financial analysis of HSS expenditures in both countries. RESULTS: Data triangulated from multiple sources showed that channeling HSS funds thorugh a health partner in Cameroon allowed compliance with budget, the development of a stronger accounting system at the Ministry of Health (MOH), and a rigid monitoring system. However, this mechanism delayed implementation by six months, accounted for 15% of the total cost, and created a tension around roles between MOH and the health partner. Achievement of program’s output indicators was average. In Chad, expenditures complied with budget as well. However, implementation was delayed longer causing a second reprogramming of the funds. While the program had fewer output indicators in Chad, these were minimally achieved. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study of channeling Gavi HSS funds through a health partner. This new process contributed to a higher level of implementation, stronger monitoring, and strengthened accountability in Cameroon. Recipient countries of Gavi HSS grants who lack the financial management capacity can benefit from a similar process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61578522018-10-19 Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study El Bcheraoui, Charbel Miangotar, Yodé Daoud, Farah Squire, Ellen Mimche, Honoré PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Following a period of interruption of Gavi’s funds for health system strengthening (HSS) in Cameroon and Chad, the two countries reprogramed their HSS grants. To implement the reprogrammed HSS, Chad committed to better management of the funds. Cameroon chose to channel the HSS funds through one of the health partners. This process is new to Gavi’s HSS grants, and little is known about its effectiveness or characteristics. We investigated the advantages and disadvantages of this process to inform the global health community about the added value of this solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated Gavi’s HSS programs in Cameroon and Chad through a mixed methodology. To explore the pros and cons of channeling the funds through a health partner, we triangulated data from document review, key informant interviews (KIIs), field visits, and financial analysis of HSS expenditures in both countries. RESULTS: Data triangulated from multiple sources showed that channeling HSS funds thorugh a health partner in Cameroon allowed compliance with budget, the development of a stronger accounting system at the Ministry of Health (MOH), and a rigid monitoring system. However, this mechanism delayed implementation by six months, accounted for 15% of the total cost, and created a tension around roles between MOH and the health partner. Achievement of program’s output indicators was average. In Chad, expenditures complied with budget as well. However, implementation was delayed longer causing a second reprogramming of the funds. While the program had fewer output indicators in Chad, these were minimally achieved. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study of channeling Gavi HSS funds through a health partner. This new process contributed to a higher level of implementation, stronger monitoring, and strengthened accountability in Cameroon. Recipient countries of Gavi HSS grants who lack the financial management capacity can benefit from a similar process. Public Library of Science 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6157852/ /pubmed/30256809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203647 Text en © 2018 El Bcheraoui et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
El Bcheraoui, Charbel
Miangotar, Yodé
Daoud, Farah
Squire, Ellen
Mimche, Honoré
Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
title Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
title_full Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
title_fullStr Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
title_full_unstemmed Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
title_short Advantages and disadvantages of channeling Gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
title_sort advantages and disadvantages of channeling gavi’s health system strengthening funds through health partners, a case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203647
work_keys_str_mv AT elbcheraouicharbel advantagesanddisadvantagesofchannelinggavishealthsystemstrengtheningfundsthroughhealthpartnersacasestudy
AT miangotaryode advantagesanddisadvantagesofchannelinggavishealthsystemstrengtheningfundsthroughhealthpartnersacasestudy
AT daoudfarah advantagesanddisadvantagesofchannelinggavishealthsystemstrengtheningfundsthroughhealthpartnersacasestudy
AT squireellen advantagesanddisadvantagesofchannelinggavishealthsystemstrengtheningfundsthroughhealthpartnersacasestudy
AT mimchehonore advantagesanddisadvantagesofchannelinggavishealthsystemstrengtheningfundsthroughhealthpartnersacasestudy