Cargando…

Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the most common obstetric emergency. A well-established postpartum haemorrhage protocol in the labour ward is crucial for effective treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate if practical obstetric team training improves the patient outcome and clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baldvinsdóttir, Tinna, Blomberg, Marie, Lilliecreutz, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203806
_version_ 1783358335461883904
author Baldvinsdóttir, Tinna
Blomberg, Marie
Lilliecreutz, Caroline
author_facet Baldvinsdóttir, Tinna
Blomberg, Marie
Lilliecreutz, Caroline
author_sort Baldvinsdóttir, Tinna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the most common obstetric emergency. A well-established postpartum haemorrhage protocol in the labour ward is crucial for effective treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate if practical obstetric team training improves the patient outcome and clinical management of PPH. SETTING: The practical obstetric team training (PROBE) at Linköping University Hospital, Sweden, with approximate 3000 deliveries annually, was studied between the years of 2004–2011. Each team consisted of one or two midwives, one obstetrician or one junior doctor and one nurse assistant. Emergency obstetrics cases were trained in a simulation setting. PROBE was scheduled during work hours at an interval of 1.5 years. POPULATION: Pre-PROBE women (N = 419 were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2004–2007 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. Post-PROBE women (N = 483) were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2008–2011 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. The two groups were compared regarding blood loss parameters and management variables using retrospective data from medical records. RESULTS: No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, haemoglobin level, blood transfusions or the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage between the two groups. Post-PROBE women had more often secured venous access (p<0.001), monitoring of vital signs (p<0.001) and received fluid resuscitation (p<0.001) compared to pre-PROBE women. The use of uterine massage was also more common among the post-PROBE women compared with the pre-PROBE women (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PROBE improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage in the labour ward. These new findings may have clinical implications since they confirm that training was effective concerning the management of postpartum haemorrhage. However, there is still no clear evidence that simulation training improve patient outcome in women with PPH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61578552018-10-19 Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training Baldvinsdóttir, Tinna Blomberg, Marie Lilliecreutz, Caroline PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the most common obstetric emergency. A well-established postpartum haemorrhage protocol in the labour ward is crucial for effective treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate if practical obstetric team training improves the patient outcome and clinical management of PPH. SETTING: The practical obstetric team training (PROBE) at Linköping University Hospital, Sweden, with approximate 3000 deliveries annually, was studied between the years of 2004–2011. Each team consisted of one or two midwives, one obstetrician or one junior doctor and one nurse assistant. Emergency obstetrics cases were trained in a simulation setting. PROBE was scheduled during work hours at an interval of 1.5 years. POPULATION: Pre-PROBE women (N = 419 were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2004–2007 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. Post-PROBE women (N = 483) were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2008–2011 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. The two groups were compared regarding blood loss parameters and management variables using retrospective data from medical records. RESULTS: No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, haemoglobin level, blood transfusions or the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage between the two groups. Post-PROBE women had more often secured venous access (p<0.001), monitoring of vital signs (p<0.001) and received fluid resuscitation (p<0.001) compared to pre-PROBE women. The use of uterine massage was also more common among the post-PROBE women compared with the pre-PROBE women (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PROBE improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage in the labour ward. These new findings may have clinical implications since they confirm that training was effective concerning the management of postpartum haemorrhage. However, there is still no clear evidence that simulation training improve patient outcome in women with PPH. Public Library of Science 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6157855/ /pubmed/30256808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203806 Text en © 2018 Baldvinsdóttir et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baldvinsdóttir, Tinna
Blomberg, Marie
Lilliecreutz, Caroline
Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training
title Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training
title_full Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training
title_fullStr Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training
title_full_unstemmed Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training
title_short Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—An observational study of practical obstetric team training
title_sort improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage—an observational study of practical obstetric team training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203806
work_keys_str_mv AT baldvinsdottirtinna improvedclinicalmanagementbutnotpatientoutcomeinwomenwithpostpartumhaemorrhageanobservationalstudyofpracticalobstetricteamtraining
AT blombergmarie improvedclinicalmanagementbutnotpatientoutcomeinwomenwithpostpartumhaemorrhageanobservationalstudyofpracticalobstetricteamtraining
AT lilliecreutzcaroline improvedclinicalmanagementbutnotpatientoutcomeinwomenwithpostpartumhaemorrhageanobservationalstudyofpracticalobstetricteamtraining