Cargando…

Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road

Bipedal locomotion may occur over imperfect surfaces with bumps or other features that disrupt steady gait. An unexpected bump in the road is generally expected to slow down most types of locomotion. On wheels, speed may be regained quite readily with “cruise control” performed in continuous time. B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darici, Osman, Temeltas, Hakan, Kuo, Arthur D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204205
_version_ 1783358340373413888
author Darici, Osman
Temeltas, Hakan
Kuo, Arthur D.
author_facet Darici, Osman
Temeltas, Hakan
Kuo, Arthur D.
author_sort Darici, Osman
collection PubMed
description Bipedal locomotion may occur over imperfect surfaces with bumps or other features that disrupt steady gait. An unexpected bump in the road is generally expected to slow down most types of locomotion. On wheels, speed may be regained quite readily with “cruise control” performed in continuous time. But legged locomotion is less straightforward, because the stance leg may be under-actuated, and the continuous-time dynamics are periodically disrupted by discrete ground contact events. Those events may also afford good control opportunities, albeit subject to the delay between discrete opportunities. The regulation of walking speed should ideally use these opportunities to compensate for lost time, and with good economy if possible. However, the appropriate control strategy is unknown. Here we present how to restore speed and make up for time lost going over a bump in the road, through discrete, once-per-step control. We use a simple dynamic walking model to determine the optimal sequence of control actions—pushing off from the leg at the end of each stance phase—for fast response or best economy. A two-step, deadbeat sequence is the fastest possible response, and reasonably economical. Slower responses over more steps are more economical overall, but a bigger difference is that they demand considerably less peak power. A simple, reactive control strategy can thus compensate for an unexpected bump, with explicit trade-offs in time and work. Control of legged locomotion is not as straightforward as with wheels, but discrete control actions also allow for effective and economical reactions to imperfect terrain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61578762018-10-19 Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road Darici, Osman Temeltas, Hakan Kuo, Arthur D. PLoS One Research Article Bipedal locomotion may occur over imperfect surfaces with bumps or other features that disrupt steady gait. An unexpected bump in the road is generally expected to slow down most types of locomotion. On wheels, speed may be regained quite readily with “cruise control” performed in continuous time. But legged locomotion is less straightforward, because the stance leg may be under-actuated, and the continuous-time dynamics are periodically disrupted by discrete ground contact events. Those events may also afford good control opportunities, albeit subject to the delay between discrete opportunities. The regulation of walking speed should ideally use these opportunities to compensate for lost time, and with good economy if possible. However, the appropriate control strategy is unknown. Here we present how to restore speed and make up for time lost going over a bump in the road, through discrete, once-per-step control. We use a simple dynamic walking model to determine the optimal sequence of control actions—pushing off from the leg at the end of each stance phase—for fast response or best economy. A two-step, deadbeat sequence is the fastest possible response, and reasonably economical. Slower responses over more steps are more economical overall, but a bigger difference is that they demand considerably less peak power. A simple, reactive control strategy can thus compensate for an unexpected bump, with explicit trade-offs in time and work. Control of legged locomotion is not as straightforward as with wheels, but discrete control actions also allow for effective and economical reactions to imperfect terrain. Public Library of Science 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6157876/ /pubmed/30256825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204205 Text en © 2018 Darici et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Darici, Osman
Temeltas, Hakan
Kuo, Arthur D.
Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
title Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
title_full Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
title_fullStr Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
title_full_unstemmed Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
title_short Optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
title_sort optimal regulation of bipedal walking speed despite an unexpected bump in the road
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30256825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204205
work_keys_str_mv AT dariciosman optimalregulationofbipedalwalkingspeeddespiteanunexpectedbumpintheroad
AT temeltashakan optimalregulationofbipedalwalkingspeeddespiteanunexpectedbumpintheroad
AT kuoarthurd optimalregulationofbipedalwalkingspeeddespiteanunexpectedbumpintheroad