Cargando…

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy was developed for treating wounds associated with unfavorable healing factors. The principles of the negative pressure wound therapy applied on clean and closed surgical incision originate the closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). We evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrando, Pietro M., Ala, Ada, Bussone, Riccardo, Bergamasco, Laura, Actis Perinetti, Federica, Malan, Fabrizio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001732
_version_ 1783358348531335168
author Ferrando, Pietro M.
Ala, Ada
Bussone, Riccardo
Bergamasco, Laura
Actis Perinetti, Federica
Malan, Fabrizio
author_facet Ferrando, Pietro M.
Ala, Ada
Bussone, Riccardo
Bergamasco, Laura
Actis Perinetti, Federica
Malan, Fabrizio
author_sort Ferrando, Pietro M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy was developed for treating wounds associated with unfavorable healing factors. The principles of the negative pressure wound therapy applied on clean and closed surgical incision originate the closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). We evaluated the use of ciNPT in the setting of oncological breast surgery. METHODS: From January 1, 2015, to June 31, 2015, we prospectively selected 37 patients undergoing oncological breast surgery with a minimum of 4 risk factors. Seventeen patients (25 surgeries) voluntary tested ciNPT (ciNPT sample), whereas the remaining 20 (22 surgeries) chose conventional postsurgery dressing (Standard Care sample). Follow-up controls to evaluate postsurgical complications were performed on days 7, 14, 30, and 90. At 12 months, the quality of life, scar, and overall aesthetic outcomes were evaluated with specific questionnaires filled in by surgeon and patient. The Standard Care sample was investigated on risk factors associated with poor healing. RESULTS: The ciNPT sample showed a significant prevalence of high risk factors, especially extensive undermining and bilateral surgeries, and a predominance of women under 65 years; only 1/25 (4%) surgical procedures was followed by complications. In the Standard Care sample, 10 of 22 surgeries (45%) were followed by complications. The difference in complication rate between the 2 samples was significant. The BIS (Body Image Scale) scores suggested that most patients were satisfied with their body image regardless of the type of dressing. All other questionnaire scores clearly vouched for a significant superiority of the ciNPT. Previous surgery ≤ 30 days emerged as the surgery-related high risk factor most frequently associated with postsurgery complications. CONCLUSION: The results of our study support the use of ciNPT in oncological breast surgery: it showed to be a well-tolerated, adaptable, and reliable dressing capable of reducing postsurgical complications and improving scar outcomes in patients presenting with high risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6157932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61579322018-10-01 Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings Ferrando, Pietro M. Ala, Ada Bussone, Riccardo Bergamasco, Laura Actis Perinetti, Federica Malan, Fabrizio Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy was developed for treating wounds associated with unfavorable healing factors. The principles of the negative pressure wound therapy applied on clean and closed surgical incision originate the closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). We evaluated the use of ciNPT in the setting of oncological breast surgery. METHODS: From January 1, 2015, to June 31, 2015, we prospectively selected 37 patients undergoing oncological breast surgery with a minimum of 4 risk factors. Seventeen patients (25 surgeries) voluntary tested ciNPT (ciNPT sample), whereas the remaining 20 (22 surgeries) chose conventional postsurgery dressing (Standard Care sample). Follow-up controls to evaluate postsurgical complications were performed on days 7, 14, 30, and 90. At 12 months, the quality of life, scar, and overall aesthetic outcomes were evaluated with specific questionnaires filled in by surgeon and patient. The Standard Care sample was investigated on risk factors associated with poor healing. RESULTS: The ciNPT sample showed a significant prevalence of high risk factors, especially extensive undermining and bilateral surgeries, and a predominance of women under 65 years; only 1/25 (4%) surgical procedures was followed by complications. In the Standard Care sample, 10 of 22 surgeries (45%) were followed by complications. The difference in complication rate between the 2 samples was significant. The BIS (Body Image Scale) scores suggested that most patients were satisfied with their body image regardless of the type of dressing. All other questionnaire scores clearly vouched for a significant superiority of the ciNPT. Previous surgery ≤ 30 days emerged as the surgery-related high risk factor most frequently associated with postsurgery complications. CONCLUSION: The results of our study support the use of ciNPT in oncological breast surgery: it showed to be a well-tolerated, adaptable, and reliable dressing capable of reducing postsurgical complications and improving scar outcomes in patients presenting with high risk factors. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6157932/ /pubmed/30276035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001732 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ferrando, Pietro M.
Ala, Ada
Bussone, Riccardo
Bergamasco, Laura
Actis Perinetti, Federica
Malan, Fabrizio
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
title Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
title_full Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
title_fullStr Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
title_full_unstemmed Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
title_short Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
title_sort closed incision negative pressure therapy in oncological breast surgery: comparison with standard care dressings
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001732
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrandopietrom closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings
AT alaada closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings
AT bussonericcardo closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings
AT bergamascolaura closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings
AT actisperinettifederica closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings
AT malanfabrizio closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings