Cargando…
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings
BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy was developed for treating wounds associated with unfavorable healing factors. The principles of the negative pressure wound therapy applied on clean and closed surgical incision originate the closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). We evaluated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001732 |
_version_ | 1783358348531335168 |
---|---|
author | Ferrando, Pietro M. Ala, Ada Bussone, Riccardo Bergamasco, Laura Actis Perinetti, Federica Malan, Fabrizio |
author_facet | Ferrando, Pietro M. Ala, Ada Bussone, Riccardo Bergamasco, Laura Actis Perinetti, Federica Malan, Fabrizio |
author_sort | Ferrando, Pietro M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy was developed for treating wounds associated with unfavorable healing factors. The principles of the negative pressure wound therapy applied on clean and closed surgical incision originate the closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). We evaluated the use of ciNPT in the setting of oncological breast surgery. METHODS: From January 1, 2015, to June 31, 2015, we prospectively selected 37 patients undergoing oncological breast surgery with a minimum of 4 risk factors. Seventeen patients (25 surgeries) voluntary tested ciNPT (ciNPT sample), whereas the remaining 20 (22 surgeries) chose conventional postsurgery dressing (Standard Care sample). Follow-up controls to evaluate postsurgical complications were performed on days 7, 14, 30, and 90. At 12 months, the quality of life, scar, and overall aesthetic outcomes were evaluated with specific questionnaires filled in by surgeon and patient. The Standard Care sample was investigated on risk factors associated with poor healing. RESULTS: The ciNPT sample showed a significant prevalence of high risk factors, especially extensive undermining and bilateral surgeries, and a predominance of women under 65 years; only 1/25 (4%) surgical procedures was followed by complications. In the Standard Care sample, 10 of 22 surgeries (45%) were followed by complications. The difference in complication rate between the 2 samples was significant. The BIS (Body Image Scale) scores suggested that most patients were satisfied with their body image regardless of the type of dressing. All other questionnaire scores clearly vouched for a significant superiority of the ciNPT. Previous surgery ≤ 30 days emerged as the surgery-related high risk factor most frequently associated with postsurgery complications. CONCLUSION: The results of our study support the use of ciNPT in oncological breast surgery: it showed to be a well-tolerated, adaptable, and reliable dressing capable of reducing postsurgical complications and improving scar outcomes in patients presenting with high risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6157932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61579322018-10-01 Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings Ferrando, Pietro M. Ala, Ada Bussone, Riccardo Bergamasco, Laura Actis Perinetti, Federica Malan, Fabrizio Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy was developed for treating wounds associated with unfavorable healing factors. The principles of the negative pressure wound therapy applied on clean and closed surgical incision originate the closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). We evaluated the use of ciNPT in the setting of oncological breast surgery. METHODS: From January 1, 2015, to June 31, 2015, we prospectively selected 37 patients undergoing oncological breast surgery with a minimum of 4 risk factors. Seventeen patients (25 surgeries) voluntary tested ciNPT (ciNPT sample), whereas the remaining 20 (22 surgeries) chose conventional postsurgery dressing (Standard Care sample). Follow-up controls to evaluate postsurgical complications were performed on days 7, 14, 30, and 90. At 12 months, the quality of life, scar, and overall aesthetic outcomes were evaluated with specific questionnaires filled in by surgeon and patient. The Standard Care sample was investigated on risk factors associated with poor healing. RESULTS: The ciNPT sample showed a significant prevalence of high risk factors, especially extensive undermining and bilateral surgeries, and a predominance of women under 65 years; only 1/25 (4%) surgical procedures was followed by complications. In the Standard Care sample, 10 of 22 surgeries (45%) were followed by complications. The difference in complication rate between the 2 samples was significant. The BIS (Body Image Scale) scores suggested that most patients were satisfied with their body image regardless of the type of dressing. All other questionnaire scores clearly vouched for a significant superiority of the ciNPT. Previous surgery ≤ 30 days emerged as the surgery-related high risk factor most frequently associated with postsurgery complications. CONCLUSION: The results of our study support the use of ciNPT in oncological breast surgery: it showed to be a well-tolerated, adaptable, and reliable dressing capable of reducing postsurgical complications and improving scar outcomes in patients presenting with high risk factors. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6157932/ /pubmed/30276035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001732 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ferrando, Pietro M. Ala, Ada Bussone, Riccardo Bergamasco, Laura Actis Perinetti, Federica Malan, Fabrizio Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings |
title | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings |
title_full | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings |
title_fullStr | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings |
title_full_unstemmed | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings |
title_short | Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings |
title_sort | closed incision negative pressure therapy in oncological breast surgery: comparison with standard care dressings |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6157932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrandopietrom closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings AT alaada closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings AT bussonericcardo closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings AT bergamascolaura closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings AT actisperinettifederica closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings AT malanfabrizio closedincisionnegativepressuretherapyinoncologicalbreastsurgerycomparisonwithstandardcaredressings |