Cargando…

A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection

The closed-loop application of electrical stimulation via chronically implanted electrodes is a novel approach to stop seizures in patients with focal-onset epilepsy. To this end, an energy efficient seizure detector that can be implemented in an implantable device is of crucial importance. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzouri, Farrokh, Heller, Simon, Dümpelmann, Matthias, Woias, Peter, Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00043
_version_ 1783358408507785216
author Manzouri, Farrokh
Heller, Simon
Dümpelmann, Matthias
Woias, Peter
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
author_facet Manzouri, Farrokh
Heller, Simon
Dümpelmann, Matthias
Woias, Peter
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
author_sort Manzouri, Farrokh
collection PubMed
description The closed-loop application of electrical stimulation via chronically implanted electrodes is a novel approach to stop seizures in patients with focal-onset epilepsy. To this end, an energy efficient seizure detector that can be implemented in an implantable device is of crucial importance. In this study, we first evaluated the performance of two machine learning algorithms (Random Forest classifier and support vector machine (SVM)) by using selected time and frequency domain features with a limited need of computational resources. Performance of the algorithms was further compared to a detection strategy implemented in an existing closed loop neurostimulation device for the treatment of epilepsy. The results show a superior performance of the Random Forest classifier compared to the SVM classifier and the reference approach. Next, we implemented the feature extraction and classification process of the Random Forest classifier on a microcontroller to evaluate the energy efficiency of this seizure detector. In conclusion, the feature set in combination with Random Forest classifier is an energy efficient hardware implementation that shows an improvement of detection sensitivity and specificity compared to the presently available closed-loop intervention in epilepsy while preserving a low detection delay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6158331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61583312018-10-05 A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection Manzouri, Farrokh Heller, Simon Dümpelmann, Matthias Woias, Peter Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience The closed-loop application of electrical stimulation via chronically implanted electrodes is a novel approach to stop seizures in patients with focal-onset epilepsy. To this end, an energy efficient seizure detector that can be implemented in an implantable device is of crucial importance. In this study, we first evaluated the performance of two machine learning algorithms (Random Forest classifier and support vector machine (SVM)) by using selected time and frequency domain features with a limited need of computational resources. Performance of the algorithms was further compared to a detection strategy implemented in an existing closed loop neurostimulation device for the treatment of epilepsy. The results show a superior performance of the Random Forest classifier compared to the SVM classifier and the reference approach. Next, we implemented the feature extraction and classification process of the Random Forest classifier on a microcontroller to evaluate the energy efficiency of this seizure detector. In conclusion, the feature set in combination with Random Forest classifier is an energy efficient hardware implementation that shows an improvement of detection sensitivity and specificity compared to the presently available closed-loop intervention in epilepsy while preserving a low detection delay. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6158331/ /pubmed/30294263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00043 Text en Copyright © 2018 Manzouri, Heller, Dümpelmann, Woias and Schulze-Bonhage. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Manzouri, Farrokh
Heller, Simon
Dümpelmann, Matthias
Woias, Peter
Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas
A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
title A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
title_full A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
title_fullStr A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
title_short A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
title_sort comparison of machine learning classifiers for energy-efficient implementation of seizure detection
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294263
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00043
work_keys_str_mv AT manzourifarrokh acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT hellersimon acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT dumpelmannmatthias acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT woiaspeter acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT schulzebonhageandreas acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT manzourifarrokh comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT hellersimon comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT dumpelmannmatthias comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT woiaspeter comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection
AT schulzebonhageandreas comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection