Cargando…
A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection
The closed-loop application of electrical stimulation via chronically implanted electrodes is a novel approach to stop seizures in patients with focal-onset epilepsy. To this end, an energy efficient seizure detector that can be implemented in an implantable device is of crucial importance. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00043 |
_version_ | 1783358408507785216 |
---|---|
author | Manzouri, Farrokh Heller, Simon Dümpelmann, Matthias Woias, Peter Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas |
author_facet | Manzouri, Farrokh Heller, Simon Dümpelmann, Matthias Woias, Peter Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas |
author_sort | Manzouri, Farrokh |
collection | PubMed |
description | The closed-loop application of electrical stimulation via chronically implanted electrodes is a novel approach to stop seizures in patients with focal-onset epilepsy. To this end, an energy efficient seizure detector that can be implemented in an implantable device is of crucial importance. In this study, we first evaluated the performance of two machine learning algorithms (Random Forest classifier and support vector machine (SVM)) by using selected time and frequency domain features with a limited need of computational resources. Performance of the algorithms was further compared to a detection strategy implemented in an existing closed loop neurostimulation device for the treatment of epilepsy. The results show a superior performance of the Random Forest classifier compared to the SVM classifier and the reference approach. Next, we implemented the feature extraction and classification process of the Random Forest classifier on a microcontroller to evaluate the energy efficiency of this seizure detector. In conclusion, the feature set in combination with Random Forest classifier is an energy efficient hardware implementation that shows an improvement of detection sensitivity and specificity compared to the presently available closed-loop intervention in epilepsy while preserving a low detection delay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6158331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61583312018-10-05 A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection Manzouri, Farrokh Heller, Simon Dümpelmann, Matthias Woias, Peter Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience The closed-loop application of electrical stimulation via chronically implanted electrodes is a novel approach to stop seizures in patients with focal-onset epilepsy. To this end, an energy efficient seizure detector that can be implemented in an implantable device is of crucial importance. In this study, we first evaluated the performance of two machine learning algorithms (Random Forest classifier and support vector machine (SVM)) by using selected time and frequency domain features with a limited need of computational resources. Performance of the algorithms was further compared to a detection strategy implemented in an existing closed loop neurostimulation device for the treatment of epilepsy. The results show a superior performance of the Random Forest classifier compared to the SVM classifier and the reference approach. Next, we implemented the feature extraction and classification process of the Random Forest classifier on a microcontroller to evaluate the energy efficiency of this seizure detector. In conclusion, the feature set in combination with Random Forest classifier is an energy efficient hardware implementation that shows an improvement of detection sensitivity and specificity compared to the presently available closed-loop intervention in epilepsy while preserving a low detection delay. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6158331/ /pubmed/30294263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00043 Text en Copyright © 2018 Manzouri, Heller, Dümpelmann, Woias and Schulze-Bonhage. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Manzouri, Farrokh Heller, Simon Dümpelmann, Matthias Woias, Peter Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection |
title | A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection |
title_full | A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection |
title_short | A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Energy-Efficient Implementation of Seizure Detection |
title_sort | comparison of machine learning classifiers for energy-efficient implementation of seizure detection |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294263 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2018.00043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manzourifarrokh acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT hellersimon acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT dumpelmannmatthias acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT woiaspeter acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT schulzebonhageandreas acomparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT manzourifarrokh comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT hellersimon comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT dumpelmannmatthias comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT woiaspeter comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection AT schulzebonhageandreas comparisonofmachinelearningclassifiersforenergyefficientimplementationofseizuredetection |