Cargando…

Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory infections may promote bacterial super-infection decreasing the host immune response efficiency. However, using a mice model we recently demonstrated that preventive treatment with the bacterial extract OM-85 reduces the susceptibility to a secondary Streptococcus (S.)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Giovanni A., Bessler, Wolfgang, Ballarini, Stefania, Pasquali, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30257691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0569-7
_version_ 1783358516032962560
author Rossi, Giovanni A.
Bessler, Wolfgang
Ballarini, Stefania
Pasquali, Christian
author_facet Rossi, Giovanni A.
Bessler, Wolfgang
Ballarini, Stefania
Pasquali, Christian
author_sort Rossi, Giovanni A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory infections may promote bacterial super-infection decreasing the host immune response efficiency. However, using a mice model we recently demonstrated that preventive treatment with the bacterial extract OM-85 reduces the susceptibility to a secondary Streptococcus (S.) pneumoniae infection after influenza virus (I.V.) challenge. METHODS: To better characterize the efficacy of OM-85 against S. pneumoniae super-infection, a post-hoc analysis was conducted, comparing efficacy (survival) and morbidity signs (clinical score, body temperature and weight loss) in the OM-85 and the control (BLANC) groups of mice after: a) I.V. infection; b) primary S. pneumoniae infection and c) post-I.V. S. pneumoniae super-infection. RESULTS: After a sublethal I.V. dose, all mice stayed alive at day 5 and no differences in morbidity signs were detected between the OM-85 and the BLANC groups. However, OM-85 pretreatment led to a significantly reduction of the viral load in the lung on day 5 post viral infection and, on day 10, reduced neutrophilic inflammation while increasing influenza-specific CD8 + T-cell proportion in the airways. Conversely to viral infection, exposure to S. pneumoniae induced a dramatic reduction of survival, with no mice surviving on day 3 post infection in the BLANC group, whereas a partial protective effect was observed in OM-85 pre-treated mice (20% of mice surviving at day 3, and 10% at day 4 and 5). The morbidity data substantiated the survival results. Interestingly, in the “super-infection” study, when mice were exposed to a sublethal I.V. dose followed by a secondary S. pneumoniae infection, all mice died by day 4 in the BLANC group. In contrast, in the OM-85 treated group, the survival rate was 70% at day 4 and still 50% at day 5, with positive effects on the clinical scores and on the body temperature already detectable at days 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of OM-85 pre-treatment against S. pneumoniae super-infection reflects a strong and immediate immune reaction from the host, an event that can be explained in part by a “non-specific” activation of the immune system, a positive “immune effect” of the general OM-85- induced immune response against I.V.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6158919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61589192018-10-01 Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice Rossi, Giovanni A. Bessler, Wolfgang Ballarini, Stefania Pasquali, Christian Ital J Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory infections may promote bacterial super-infection decreasing the host immune response efficiency. However, using a mice model we recently demonstrated that preventive treatment with the bacterial extract OM-85 reduces the susceptibility to a secondary Streptococcus (S.) pneumoniae infection after influenza virus (I.V.) challenge. METHODS: To better characterize the efficacy of OM-85 against S. pneumoniae super-infection, a post-hoc analysis was conducted, comparing efficacy (survival) and morbidity signs (clinical score, body temperature and weight loss) in the OM-85 and the control (BLANC) groups of mice after: a) I.V. infection; b) primary S. pneumoniae infection and c) post-I.V. S. pneumoniae super-infection. RESULTS: After a sublethal I.V. dose, all mice stayed alive at day 5 and no differences in morbidity signs were detected between the OM-85 and the BLANC groups. However, OM-85 pretreatment led to a significantly reduction of the viral load in the lung on day 5 post viral infection and, on day 10, reduced neutrophilic inflammation while increasing influenza-specific CD8 + T-cell proportion in the airways. Conversely to viral infection, exposure to S. pneumoniae induced a dramatic reduction of survival, with no mice surviving on day 3 post infection in the BLANC group, whereas a partial protective effect was observed in OM-85 pre-treated mice (20% of mice surviving at day 3, and 10% at day 4 and 5). The morbidity data substantiated the survival results. Interestingly, in the “super-infection” study, when mice were exposed to a sublethal I.V. dose followed by a secondary S. pneumoniae infection, all mice died by day 4 in the BLANC group. In contrast, in the OM-85 treated group, the survival rate was 70% at day 4 and still 50% at day 5, with positive effects on the clinical scores and on the body temperature already detectable at days 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of OM-85 pre-treatment against S. pneumoniae super-infection reflects a strong and immediate immune reaction from the host, an event that can be explained in part by a “non-specific” activation of the immune system, a positive “immune effect” of the general OM-85- induced immune response against I.V. BioMed Central 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6158919/ /pubmed/30257691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0569-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Rossi, Giovanni A.
Bessler, Wolfgang
Ballarini, Stefania
Pasquali, Christian
Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
title Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
title_full Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
title_fullStr Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
title_full_unstemmed Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
title_short Evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by OM-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
title_sort evidence that a primary anti-viral stimulation of the immune response by om-85 reduces susceptibility to a secondary respiratory bacterial infection in mice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6158919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30257691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-018-0569-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rossigiovannia evidencethataprimaryantiviralstimulationoftheimmuneresponsebyom85reducessusceptibilitytoasecondaryrespiratorybacterialinfectioninmice
AT besslerwolfgang evidencethataprimaryantiviralstimulationoftheimmuneresponsebyom85reducessusceptibilitytoasecondaryrespiratorybacterialinfectioninmice
AT ballarinistefania evidencethataprimaryantiviralstimulationoftheimmuneresponsebyom85reducessusceptibilitytoasecondaryrespiratorybacterialinfectioninmice
AT pasqualichristian evidencethataprimaryantiviralstimulationoftheimmuneresponsebyom85reducessusceptibilitytoasecondaryrespiratorybacterialinfectioninmice