Cargando…

Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis

The case involves a 69-year-old female with severe, longstanding bronchiectasis secondary to childhood pertussis infection. She presented to the hospital and was thought clinically to have a pulmonary embolus. A CT pulmonary angiogram was performed, which was technically satisfactory. This revealed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Main, Cheryl, Abbas, Ausami, Shambrook, James S, Peebles, Charles, Harden, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20160021
_version_ 1783358598419578880
author Main, Cheryl
Abbas, Ausami
Shambrook, James S
Peebles, Charles
Harden, Stephen
author_facet Main, Cheryl
Abbas, Ausami
Shambrook, James S
Peebles, Charles
Harden, Stephen
author_sort Main, Cheryl
collection PubMed
description The case involves a 69-year-old female with severe, longstanding bronchiectasis secondary to childhood pertussis infection. She presented to the hospital and was thought clinically to have a pulmonary embolus. A CT pulmonary angiogram was performed, which was technically satisfactory. This revealed multiple, bilateral filling defects that were fairly convincing for pulmonary emboli. Further review of the CT scan not only revealed the extent of her bronchiectasis but also a number of enlarged bronchial arteries supplying the diseased lung. The pulmonary arterial filling defects arose suspiciously close to the bronchial arteries and the possibility of bronchial to pulmonary artery anastomoses was considered. Could the admixture of highly contrast-opacified pulmonary arterial blood with partially opacified systemic arterial blood cause the apparent filling defects? After further consideration, a second electrocardiography-gated CT angiogram was performed—this time in the systemic arterial phase but planned with two regions of interest sited over the main pulmonary artery and the aorta with the aim of triggering the scan with maximum contrast in the bronchial arteries, and as much contrast washout as possible in the pulmonary arteries. This study revealed a reversal of the CT pulmonary angiogram appearances with contrast now seen in the bronchial arteries and opacifying the sites of the previous filling defects in the pulmonary arteries. Thus, the filling defects were actually false positives caused by an admixture of highly opacified and part-opacified blood via bronchial artery anastomoses. In the context of a false-positive finding of pulmonary embolus on a background of severe bronchiectasis, unnecessary anticoagulation could have increased the risk of complications such as haemoptysis. This case report illustrates the importance of knowledge of potential false-positive findings in CT pulmonary angiography and describes a novel approach based on cardiac CT techniques to prove this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6159287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The British Institute of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61592872018-10-25 Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis Main, Cheryl Abbas, Ausami Shambrook, James S Peebles, Charles Harden, Stephen BJR Case Rep Case Report The case involves a 69-year-old female with severe, longstanding bronchiectasis secondary to childhood pertussis infection. She presented to the hospital and was thought clinically to have a pulmonary embolus. A CT pulmonary angiogram was performed, which was technically satisfactory. This revealed multiple, bilateral filling defects that were fairly convincing for pulmonary emboli. Further review of the CT scan not only revealed the extent of her bronchiectasis but also a number of enlarged bronchial arteries supplying the diseased lung. The pulmonary arterial filling defects arose suspiciously close to the bronchial arteries and the possibility of bronchial to pulmonary artery anastomoses was considered. Could the admixture of highly contrast-opacified pulmonary arterial blood with partially opacified systemic arterial blood cause the apparent filling defects? After further consideration, a second electrocardiography-gated CT angiogram was performed—this time in the systemic arterial phase but planned with two regions of interest sited over the main pulmonary artery and the aorta with the aim of triggering the scan with maximum contrast in the bronchial arteries, and as much contrast washout as possible in the pulmonary arteries. This study revealed a reversal of the CT pulmonary angiogram appearances with contrast now seen in the bronchial arteries and opacifying the sites of the previous filling defects in the pulmonary arteries. Thus, the filling defects were actually false positives caused by an admixture of highly opacified and part-opacified blood via bronchial artery anastomoses. In the context of a false-positive finding of pulmonary embolus on a background of severe bronchiectasis, unnecessary anticoagulation could have increased the risk of complications such as haemoptysis. This case report illustrates the importance of knowledge of potential false-positive findings in CT pulmonary angiography and describes a novel approach based on cardiac CT techniques to prove this. The British Institute of Radiology 2016-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6159287/ /pubmed/30363258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20160021 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Main, Cheryl
Abbas, Ausami
Shambrook, James S
Peebles, Charles
Harden, Stephen
Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis
title Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis
title_full Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis
title_fullStr Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis
title_short Clot or not? An unusual case of false positive CTPA and an approach to diagnosis
title_sort clot or not? an unusual case of false positive ctpa and an approach to diagnosis
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30363258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjrcr.20160021
work_keys_str_mv AT maincheryl clotornotanunusualcaseoffalsepositivectpaandanapproachtodiagnosis
AT abbasausami clotornotanunusualcaseoffalsepositivectpaandanapproachtodiagnosis
AT shambrookjamess clotornotanunusualcaseoffalsepositivectpaandanapproachtodiagnosis
AT peeblescharles clotornotanunusualcaseoffalsepositivectpaandanapproachtodiagnosis
AT hardenstephen clotornotanunusualcaseoffalsepositivectpaandanapproachtodiagnosis