Cargando…

The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

PURPOSE: To identify the most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 male and 13 female; age: 50 ± 13 years) with a known primary tumor and eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quaia, Emilio, Gennari, Antonio Giulio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_12_17
_version_ 1783358607962669056
author Quaia, Emilio
Gennari, Antonio Giulio
author_facet Quaia, Emilio
Gennari, Antonio Giulio
author_sort Quaia, Emilio
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To identify the most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 male and 13 female; age: 50 ± 13 years) with a known primary tumor and evidence of liver metastases on unenhanced ultrasound (US) underwent CEUS. CEUS consisted of continuous liver parenchyma scanning during arterial (15–35 s after microbubble injection), portal venous (40–120 s), and late phase (from 120 s up to microbubble disappearance). Subjective conspicuity index (ranging from 1 to 5) and objective conspicuity index (I(lesion)–I(liver)/I(liver), I = signal intensity) were calculated on reference frames selected on arterial phase and every 20 s on portal venous and late phase. RESULTS: A total number of 40 liver metastases were identified after microbubble injection. The highest liver metastasis conspicuity was observed on early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) both on visual (mean subjective conspicuity index ± standard deviation [SD] = 4.36 ± 0.75, reader 1; 4.25 ± 0.65, reader 2) and quantitative analysis (mean objective conspicuity index ± SD = −0.99 ± 0.001). CONCLUSION: The early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) provides the best liver metastases' conspicuity after microbubble contrast agent injection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6159328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61593282018-10-03 The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quaia, Emilio Gennari, Antonio Giulio J Med Ultrasound Original Article PURPOSE: To identify the most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients (12 male and 13 female; age: 50 ± 13 years) with a known primary tumor and evidence of liver metastases on unenhanced ultrasound (US) underwent CEUS. CEUS consisted of continuous liver parenchyma scanning during arterial (15–35 s after microbubble injection), portal venous (40–120 s), and late phase (from 120 s up to microbubble disappearance). Subjective conspicuity index (ranging from 1 to 5) and objective conspicuity index (I(lesion)–I(liver)/I(liver), I = signal intensity) were calculated on reference frames selected on arterial phase and every 20 s on portal venous and late phase. RESULTS: A total number of 40 liver metastases were identified after microbubble injection. The highest liver metastasis conspicuity was observed on early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) both on visual (mean subjective conspicuity index ± standard deviation [SD] = 4.36 ± 0.75, reader 1; 4.25 ± 0.65, reader 2) and quantitative analysis (mean objective conspicuity index ± SD = −0.99 ± 0.001). CONCLUSION: The early portal venous phase (40–60 s after microbubble injection) provides the best liver metastases' conspicuity after microbubble contrast agent injection. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6159328/ /pubmed/30283198 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_12_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Medical Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Quaia, Emilio
Gennari, Antonio Giulio
The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
title The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
title_full The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
title_fullStr The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
title_short The Most Appropriate Time Delay after Microbubble Contrast Agent Intravenous Injection to Maximize Liver Metastasis Conspicuity on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
title_sort most appropriate time delay after microbubble contrast agent intravenous injection to maximize liver metastasis conspicuity on contrast-enhanced ultrasound
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283198
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_12_17
work_keys_str_mv AT quaiaemilio themostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
AT gennariantoniogiulio themostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
AT quaiaemilio mostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound
AT gennariantoniogiulio mostappropriatetimedelayaftermicrobubblecontrastagentintravenousinjectiontomaximizelivermetastasisconspicuityoncontrastenhancedultrasound