Cargando…

A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To establish a new evaluation method to quantify residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) volume and corneal endothelium adhesion properties for phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS: We compared the performance of four OVDs (Viscoat®, Healon5®, Healon® and DisCoVisc®) using porcine ey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mori, Hidetsugu, Yamada, Haruhiko, Toyama, Keiko, Takahashi, Kanji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30272034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00822
_version_ 1783358609801871360
author Mori, Hidetsugu
Yamada, Haruhiko
Toyama, Keiko
Takahashi, Kanji
author_facet Mori, Hidetsugu
Yamada, Haruhiko
Toyama, Keiko
Takahashi, Kanji
author_sort Mori, Hidetsugu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To establish a new evaluation method to quantify residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) volume and corneal endothelium adhesion properties for phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS: We compared the performance of four OVDs (Viscoat®, Healon5®, Healon® and DisCoVisc®) using porcine eyes. First, OVDs were mixed with fluorescent-conjugated dextrans to render them visible under the microscope. A corneal side port was opened, followed by a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, and a corneal tunnel incision was made. OVDs were injected, then the lens was removed using one-handed phacoemulsification. After this procedure, the anterior segment of the eye was isolated via an equatorial incision and the tissue was immediately frozen in shimmering liquid nitrogen. Sagittal slices (20 μm) were cut with a Cryostat from limbus to limbus. Every tenth slide was imaged using a fluorescent microscope with a CCD camera. We evaluated the percentage of the corneal endothelium covered by each OVD as the OVD adhesion to corneal endothelium ratio (OAE ratio) and the volume of residual OVD in the anterior chamber. RESULTS: Viscoat® showed significantly higher endothelium coverage compared with both Healon® and DisCoVisc®. A statistically larger volume of Healon5® remained in the anterior chamber compared with Healon® and DisCoVisc®. CONCLUSION: The new evaluation methods used here provide precise quantitative analysis of OAE ratio and residual OVD volume. These results show that Viscoat® and Healon5® have a high potential for coating the corneal endothelium during phacoemulsification and aspiration surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6159335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61593352018-09-28 A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery Mori, Hidetsugu Yamada, Haruhiko Toyama, Keiko Takahashi, Kanji Heliyon Article PURPOSE: To establish a new evaluation method to quantify residual ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) volume and corneal endothelium adhesion properties for phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS: We compared the performance of four OVDs (Viscoat®, Healon5®, Healon® and DisCoVisc®) using porcine eyes. First, OVDs were mixed with fluorescent-conjugated dextrans to render them visible under the microscope. A corneal side port was opened, followed by a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, and a corneal tunnel incision was made. OVDs were injected, then the lens was removed using one-handed phacoemulsification. After this procedure, the anterior segment of the eye was isolated via an equatorial incision and the tissue was immediately frozen in shimmering liquid nitrogen. Sagittal slices (20 μm) were cut with a Cryostat from limbus to limbus. Every tenth slide was imaged using a fluorescent microscope with a CCD camera. We evaluated the percentage of the corneal endothelium covered by each OVD as the OVD adhesion to corneal endothelium ratio (OAE ratio) and the volume of residual OVD in the anterior chamber. RESULTS: Viscoat® showed significantly higher endothelium coverage compared with both Healon® and DisCoVisc®. A statistically larger volume of Healon5® remained in the anterior chamber compared with Healon® and DisCoVisc®. CONCLUSION: The new evaluation methods used here provide precise quantitative analysis of OAE ratio and residual OVD volume. These results show that Viscoat® and Healon5® have a high potential for coating the corneal endothelium during phacoemulsification and aspiration surgery. Elsevier 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6159335/ /pubmed/30272034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00822 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mori, Hidetsugu
Yamada, Haruhiko
Toyama, Keiko
Takahashi, Kanji
A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
title A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
title_full A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
title_fullStr A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
title_short A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
title_sort new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30272034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00822
work_keys_str_mv AT morihidetsugu anewhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT yamadaharuhiko anewhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT toyamakeiko anewhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT takahashikanji anewhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT morihidetsugu newhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT yamadaharuhiko newhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT toyamakeiko newhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery
AT takahashikanji newhistologicalevaluationmethodtodetectresidualophthalmicviscosurgicaldevicesforcataractsurgery