Cargando…

Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading

Contextual constraint is a key factor affecting a word’s fixation duration and its likelihood of being fixated during reading. Previous research has generally demonstrated additive effects of predictability and frequency in fixation times. Studies examining the role of parafoveal preview have shown...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sereno, Sara C, Hand, Christopher J, Shahid, Aisha, Yao, Bo, O’Donnell, Patrick J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28481189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1327981
_version_ 1783358653661708288
author Sereno, Sara C
Hand, Christopher J
Shahid, Aisha
Yao, Bo
O’Donnell, Patrick J
author_facet Sereno, Sara C
Hand, Christopher J
Shahid, Aisha
Yao, Bo
O’Donnell, Patrick J
author_sort Sereno, Sara C
collection PubMed
description Contextual constraint is a key factor affecting a word’s fixation duration and its likelihood of being fixated during reading. Previous research has generally demonstrated additive effects of predictability and frequency in fixation times. Studies examining the role of parafoveal preview have shown that greater preview benefit is obtained from more predictable and higher frequency words versus less predictable and lower frequency words. In two experiments, we investigated effects of target word predictability, frequency and parafoveal preview. A 3 (Predictability: low, medium, high) × 2 (Frequency: low, high) design was used with Preview (valid, invalid) manipulated between experiments. With valid previews, we found main effects of Predictability and Frequency in both fixation time and fixation probability measures, including an interaction in early fixation measures. With invalid preview, we again found main effects of Predictability and Frequency in fixation times, but no evidence of an interaction. Fixation probability showed a weak Predictability effect and Predictability–Frequency interaction. Predictability interacted with Preview in early fixation time and fixation probability measures. Our findings suggest that high levels of contextual constraint exert an early influence during lexical processing in reading. Results are discussed in terms of models of language processing and eye movement control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6159772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61597722018-10-11 Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading Sereno, Sara C Hand, Christopher J Shahid, Aisha Yao, Bo O’Donnell, Patrick J Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Articles Contextual constraint is a key factor affecting a word’s fixation duration and its likelihood of being fixated during reading. Previous research has generally demonstrated additive effects of predictability and frequency in fixation times. Studies examining the role of parafoveal preview have shown that greater preview benefit is obtained from more predictable and higher frequency words versus less predictable and lower frequency words. In two experiments, we investigated effects of target word predictability, frequency and parafoveal preview. A 3 (Predictability: low, medium, high) × 2 (Frequency: low, high) design was used with Preview (valid, invalid) manipulated between experiments. With valid previews, we found main effects of Predictability and Frequency in both fixation time and fixation probability measures, including an interaction in early fixation measures. With invalid preview, we again found main effects of Predictability and Frequency in fixation times, but no evidence of an interaction. Fixation probability showed a weak Predictability effect and Predictability–Frequency interaction. Predictability interacted with Preview in early fixation time and fixation probability measures. Our findings suggest that high levels of contextual constraint exert an early influence during lexical processing in reading. Results are discussed in terms of models of language processing and eye movement control. SAGE Publications 2018-01-01 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6159772/ /pubmed/28481189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1327981 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Sereno, Sara C
Hand, Christopher J
Shahid, Aisha
Yao, Bo
O’Donnell, Patrick J
Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
title Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
title_full Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
title_fullStr Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
title_full_unstemmed Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
title_short Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
title_sort testing the limits of contextual constraint: interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28481189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1327981
work_keys_str_mv AT serenosarac testingthelimitsofcontextualconstraintinteractionswithwordfrequencyandparafovealpreviewduringfluentreading
AT handchristopherj testingthelimitsofcontextualconstraintinteractionswithwordfrequencyandparafovealpreviewduringfluentreading
AT shahidaisha testingthelimitsofcontextualconstraintinteractionswithwordfrequencyandparafovealpreviewduringfluentreading
AT yaobo testingthelimitsofcontextualconstraintinteractionswithwordfrequencyandparafovealpreviewduringfluentreading
AT odonnellpatrickj testingthelimitsofcontextualconstraintinteractionswithwordfrequencyandparafovealpreviewduringfluentreading