Cargando…
Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: According to the 2011 Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice, the low pH of intravenous vancomycin requires that it be administered through a central line. However, a careful review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the experience at New York Hospital Queens (NYHQ) did no...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811603 http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000220 |
_version_ | 1783358663952433152 |
---|---|
author | Caparas, Jona V. Hu, Jian-Ping |
author_facet | Caparas, Jona V. Hu, Jian-Ping |
author_sort | Caparas, Jona V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: According to the 2011 Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice, the low pH of intravenous vancomycin requires that it be administered through a central line. However, a careful review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the experience at New York Hospital Queens (NYHQ) did not support the position of the Standards. PURPOSE: A prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine if intravenous vancomycin could be safely administered through a novel midline catheter (POWERWAND(®), Access Scientific, San Diego, CA). METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive short-term (<6 days) intravenous vancomycin were randomly assigned to receive treatment through either a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or the midline study device. Complications and the costs of insertion were recorded. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to total complications (17.9% with PICCs vs. 19.9% with the midline), phlebitis (0% vs. 0%) or thrombosis (0% vs. 0%). One suspected catheter-associated bloodstream infection did occur in the PICC group. Insertion costs were $90.00 less per insertion in the midline group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term intravenous vancomycin can be safely and cost-efficiently administered in the deep vessels of the upper arm using the midline study device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6159818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61598182018-10-11 Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial Caparas, Jona V. Hu, Jian-Ping J Vasc Access Original Article BACKGROUND: According to the 2011 Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice, the low pH of intravenous vancomycin requires that it be administered through a central line. However, a careful review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the experience at New York Hospital Queens (NYHQ) did not support the position of the Standards. PURPOSE: A prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine if intravenous vancomycin could be safely administered through a novel midline catheter (POWERWAND(®), Access Scientific, San Diego, CA). METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive short-term (<6 days) intravenous vancomycin were randomly assigned to receive treatment through either a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or the midline study device. Complications and the costs of insertion were recorded. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to total complications (17.9% with PICCs vs. 19.9% with the midline), phlebitis (0% vs. 0%) or thrombosis (0% vs. 0%). One suspected catheter-associated bloodstream infection did occur in the PICC group. Insertion costs were $90.00 less per insertion in the midline group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term intravenous vancomycin can be safely and cost-efficiently administered in the deep vessels of the upper arm using the midline study device. SAGE Publications 2014-08-04 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6159818/ /pubmed/24811603 http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000220 Text en © 2014 SAGE Publications http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Caparas, Jona V. Hu, Jian-Ping Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial |
title | Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial |
title_full | Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial |
title_short | Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial |
title_sort | safe administration of vancomycin through a novel midline catheter: a randomized, prospective clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811603 http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caparasjonav safeadministrationofvancomycinthroughanovelmidlinecatheterarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT hujianping safeadministrationofvancomycinthroughanovelmidlinecatheterarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial |