Cargando…

Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: According to the 2011 Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice, the low pH of intravenous vancomycin requires that it be administered through a central line. However, a careful review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the experience at New York Hospital Queens (NYHQ) did no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caparas, Jona V., Hu, Jian-Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811603
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000220
_version_ 1783358663952433152
author Caparas, Jona V.
Hu, Jian-Ping
author_facet Caparas, Jona V.
Hu, Jian-Ping
author_sort Caparas, Jona V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: According to the 2011 Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice, the low pH of intravenous vancomycin requires that it be administered through a central line. However, a careful review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the experience at New York Hospital Queens (NYHQ) did not support the position of the Standards. PURPOSE: A prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine if intravenous vancomycin could be safely administered through a novel midline catheter (POWERWAND(®), Access Scientific, San Diego, CA). METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive short-term (<6 days) intravenous vancomycin were randomly assigned to receive treatment through either a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or the midline study device. Complications and the costs of insertion were recorded. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to total complications (17.9% with PICCs vs. 19.9% with the midline), phlebitis (0% vs. 0%) or thrombosis (0% vs. 0%). One suspected catheter-associated bloodstream infection did occur in the PICC group. Insertion costs were $90.00 less per insertion in the midline group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term intravenous vancomycin can be safely and cost-efficiently administered in the deep vessels of the upper arm using the midline study device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6159818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61598182018-10-11 Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial Caparas, Jona V. Hu, Jian-Ping J Vasc Access Original Article BACKGROUND: According to the 2011 Infusion Nursing Standards of Practice, the low pH of intravenous vancomycin requires that it be administered through a central line. However, a careful review of the literature and a retrospective analysis of the experience at New York Hospital Queens (NYHQ) did not support the position of the Standards. PURPOSE: A prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine if intravenous vancomycin could be safely administered through a novel midline catheter (POWERWAND(®), Access Scientific, San Diego, CA). METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive short-term (<6 days) intravenous vancomycin were randomly assigned to receive treatment through either a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or the midline study device. Complications and the costs of insertion were recorded. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to total complications (17.9% with PICCs vs. 19.9% with the midline), phlebitis (0% vs. 0%) or thrombosis (0% vs. 0%). One suspected catheter-associated bloodstream infection did occur in the PICC group. Insertion costs were $90.00 less per insertion in the midline group. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term intravenous vancomycin can be safely and cost-efficiently administered in the deep vessels of the upper arm using the midline study device. SAGE Publications 2014-08-04 2014-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6159818/ /pubmed/24811603 http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000220 Text en © 2014 SAGE Publications http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Caparas, Jona V.
Hu, Jian-Ping
Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
title Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
title_full Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
title_short Safe Administration of Vancomycin through a Novel Midline Catheter: A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial
title_sort safe administration of vancomycin through a novel midline catheter: a randomized, prospective clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6159818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24811603
http://dx.doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000220
work_keys_str_mv AT caparasjonav safeadministrationofvancomycinthroughanovelmidlinecatheterarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT hujianping safeadministrationofvancomycinthroughanovelmidlinecatheterarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial