Cargando…

Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hokke, Stacey, Hackworth, Naomi J., Quin, Nina, Bennetts, Shannon K., Win, Hnin Yee, Nicholson, Jan M., Zion, Lawrie, Lucke, Jayne, Keyzer, Patrick, Crawford, Sharinne B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572
_version_ 1783358698780884992
author Hokke, Stacey
Hackworth, Naomi J.
Quin, Nina
Bennetts, Shannon K.
Win, Hnin Yee
Nicholson, Jan M.
Zion, Lawrie
Lucke, Jayne
Keyzer, Patrick
Crawford, Sharinne B.
author_facet Hokke, Stacey
Hackworth, Naomi J.
Quin, Nina
Bennetts, Shannon K.
Win, Hnin Yee
Nicholson, Jan M.
Zion, Lawrie
Lucke, Jayne
Keyzer, Patrick
Crawford, Sharinne B.
author_sort Hokke, Stacey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate evidence on the ethical issues reported when recruiting, retaining and tracing families and children in research online, and to identify ethical guidelines for internet research. METHODS: Academic literature was searched using electronic academic databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL and Informit) and handsearching reference lists for articles published in English between January 2006 and February 2016. Grey literature was searched using Google to identify relevant ethical guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-five academic articles were included after screening 3,537 titles and abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Most articles reported using the internet to recruit participants (88%) with few reporting online retention (12%) or tracing (10%). Forty percent commented on ethical issues; the majority did not discuss ethics beyond general consent or approval procedures. Some ethical concerns were specific to engaging minors online, including parental consent, age verification and children’s vulnerability. Other concerns applied when engaging any research participant online, including privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and disparities in internet access. Five professional guidelines and 10 university guidelines on internet research ethics were identified. Few academic articles (5%) reported using these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging families and children in research online introduces unique challenges requiring careful consideration. While researchers regarded themselves as responsible for ensuring research is conducted ethically, lack of use of available guidelines and limited academic literature suggests internet research is occurring without suitable guidance. We recommend broad dissemination of ethical guidelines and encourage researchers to report the methodological and ethical issues of using the internet to engage families and children in research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6160098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61600982018-10-19 Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review Hokke, Stacey Hackworth, Naomi J. Quin, Nina Bennetts, Shannon K. Win, Hnin Yee Nicholson, Jan M. Zion, Lawrie Lucke, Jayne Keyzer, Patrick Crawford, Sharinne B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate evidence on the ethical issues reported when recruiting, retaining and tracing families and children in research online, and to identify ethical guidelines for internet research. METHODS: Academic literature was searched using electronic academic databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL and Informit) and handsearching reference lists for articles published in English between January 2006 and February 2016. Grey literature was searched using Google to identify relevant ethical guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-five academic articles were included after screening 3,537 titles and abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Most articles reported using the internet to recruit participants (88%) with few reporting online retention (12%) or tracing (10%). Forty percent commented on ethical issues; the majority did not discuss ethics beyond general consent or approval procedures. Some ethical concerns were specific to engaging minors online, including parental consent, age verification and children’s vulnerability. Other concerns applied when engaging any research participant online, including privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and disparities in internet access. Five professional guidelines and 10 university guidelines on internet research ethics were identified. Few academic articles (5%) reported using these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging families and children in research online introduces unique challenges requiring careful consideration. While researchers regarded themselves as responsible for ensuring research is conducted ethically, lack of use of available guidelines and limited academic literature suggests internet research is occurring without suitable guidance. We recommend broad dissemination of ethical guidelines and encourage researchers to report the methodological and ethical issues of using the internet to engage families and children in research. Public Library of Science 2018-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6160098/ /pubmed/30261041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572 Text en © 2018 Hokke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hokke, Stacey
Hackworth, Naomi J.
Quin, Nina
Bennetts, Shannon K.
Win, Hnin Yee
Nicholson, Jan M.
Zion, Lawrie
Lucke, Jayne
Keyzer, Patrick
Crawford, Sharinne B.
Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
title Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
title_full Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
title_fullStr Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
title_short Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
title_sort ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572
work_keys_str_mv AT hokkestacey ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT hackworthnaomij ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT quinnina ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT bennettsshannonk ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT winhninyee ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT nicholsonjanm ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT zionlawrie ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT luckejayne ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT keyzerpatrick ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview
AT crawfordsharinneb ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview