Cargando…
Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572 |
_version_ | 1783358698780884992 |
---|---|
author | Hokke, Stacey Hackworth, Naomi J. Quin, Nina Bennetts, Shannon K. Win, Hnin Yee Nicholson, Jan M. Zion, Lawrie Lucke, Jayne Keyzer, Patrick Crawford, Sharinne B. |
author_facet | Hokke, Stacey Hackworth, Naomi J. Quin, Nina Bennetts, Shannon K. Win, Hnin Yee Nicholson, Jan M. Zion, Lawrie Lucke, Jayne Keyzer, Patrick Crawford, Sharinne B. |
author_sort | Hokke, Stacey |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate evidence on the ethical issues reported when recruiting, retaining and tracing families and children in research online, and to identify ethical guidelines for internet research. METHODS: Academic literature was searched using electronic academic databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL and Informit) and handsearching reference lists for articles published in English between January 2006 and February 2016. Grey literature was searched using Google to identify relevant ethical guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-five academic articles were included after screening 3,537 titles and abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Most articles reported using the internet to recruit participants (88%) with few reporting online retention (12%) or tracing (10%). Forty percent commented on ethical issues; the majority did not discuss ethics beyond general consent or approval procedures. Some ethical concerns were specific to engaging minors online, including parental consent, age verification and children’s vulnerability. Other concerns applied when engaging any research participant online, including privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and disparities in internet access. Five professional guidelines and 10 university guidelines on internet research ethics were identified. Few academic articles (5%) reported using these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging families and children in research online introduces unique challenges requiring careful consideration. While researchers regarded themselves as responsible for ensuring research is conducted ethically, lack of use of available guidelines and limited academic literature suggests internet research is occurring without suitable guidance. We recommend broad dissemination of ethical guidelines and encourage researchers to report the methodological and ethical issues of using the internet to engage families and children in research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6160098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61600982018-10-19 Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review Hokke, Stacey Hackworth, Naomi J. Quin, Nina Bennetts, Shannon K. Win, Hnin Yee Nicholson, Jan M. Zion, Lawrie Lucke, Jayne Keyzer, Patrick Crawford, Sharinne B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The internet is an increasingly popular tool in family and child research that is argued to pose new ethical challenges, yet few studies have systematically assessed the ethical issues of engaging parents and children in research online. This scoping review aims to identify and integrate evidence on the ethical issues reported when recruiting, retaining and tracing families and children in research online, and to identify ethical guidelines for internet research. METHODS: Academic literature was searched using electronic academic databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL and Informit) and handsearching reference lists for articles published in English between January 2006 and February 2016. Grey literature was searched using Google to identify relevant ethical guidelines. RESULTS: Sixty-five academic articles were included after screening 3,537 titles and abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Most articles reported using the internet to recruit participants (88%) with few reporting online retention (12%) or tracing (10%). Forty percent commented on ethical issues; the majority did not discuss ethics beyond general consent or approval procedures. Some ethical concerns were specific to engaging minors online, including parental consent, age verification and children’s vulnerability. Other concerns applied when engaging any research participant online, including privacy and confidentiality, informed consent and disparities in internet access. Five professional guidelines and 10 university guidelines on internet research ethics were identified. Few academic articles (5%) reported using these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging families and children in research online introduces unique challenges requiring careful consideration. While researchers regarded themselves as responsible for ensuring research is conducted ethically, lack of use of available guidelines and limited academic literature suggests internet research is occurring without suitable guidance. We recommend broad dissemination of ethical guidelines and encourage researchers to report the methodological and ethical issues of using the internet to engage families and children in research. Public Library of Science 2018-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6160098/ /pubmed/30261041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572 Text en © 2018 Hokke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hokke, Stacey Hackworth, Naomi J. Quin, Nina Bennetts, Shannon K. Win, Hnin Yee Nicholson, Jan M. Zion, Lawrie Lucke, Jayne Keyzer, Patrick Crawford, Sharinne B. Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review |
title | Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review |
title_full | Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review |
title_short | Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review |
title_sort | ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hokkestacey ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT hackworthnaomij ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT quinnina ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT bennettsshannonk ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT winhninyee ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT nicholsonjanm ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT zionlawrie ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT luckejayne ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT keyzerpatrick ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview AT crawfordsharinneb ethicalissuesinusingtheinternettoengageparticipantsinfamilyandchildresearchascopingreview |