Cargando…

Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns

Different anesthetic agents induce burst suppression in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at very deep levels of general anesthesia. EEG burst suppression has been identified to be a risk factor for postoperative delirium (POD). EEG based automated detection algorithms are used to detect burst suppress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleischmann, Antonia, Pilge, Stefanie, Kiel, Tobias, Kratzer, Stephan, Schneider, Gerhard, Kreuzer, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00368
_version_ 1783358792685060096
author Fleischmann, Antonia
Pilge, Stefanie
Kiel, Tobias
Kratzer, Stephan
Schneider, Gerhard
Kreuzer, Matthias
author_facet Fleischmann, Antonia
Pilge, Stefanie
Kiel, Tobias
Kratzer, Stephan
Schneider, Gerhard
Kreuzer, Matthias
author_sort Fleischmann, Antonia
collection PubMed
description Different anesthetic agents induce burst suppression in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at very deep levels of general anesthesia. EEG burst suppression has been identified to be a risk factor for postoperative delirium (POD). EEG based automated detection algorithms are used to detect burst suppression patterns during general anesthesia and a burst suppression ratio (BSR) is calculated. Unfortunately, applied algorithms do not give information as precisely as suggested, often resulting in an underestimation of the patients’ burst suppression level. Additional knowledge of substance-specific burst suppression patterns could be of great importance to improve the ability of EEG based monitors to detect burst suppression. In a re-analysis of EEG recordings obtained from a previous study, we analyzed EEG data of 45 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The patients were anesthetized with sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol (n = 15, for each group). After skin incision, the used agent was titrated to a level when burst suppression occurred. In a visual analysis of the EEG, blinded to the used anesthetic agent, we included the first distinct burst in our analysis. To avoid bias through changing EEG dynamics throughout the burst, we only focused on the first 2 s of the burst. These episodes were analyzed using the power spectral density (PSD) and normalized PSD, the absolute burst amplitude and absolute burst slope, as well as permutation entropy (PeEn). Our results show significant substance-specific differences in the architecture of the burst. Volatile-induced bursts showed higher burst amplitudes and higher burst power. Propofol-induced bursts had significantly higher relative power in the EEG alpha-range. Further, isoflurane-induced bursts had the steepest burst slopes. We can present the first systematic comparison of substance-specific burst characteristics during anesthesia. Previous observations, mostly derived from animal studies, pointing out the substance-specific differences in bursting behavior, concur with our findings. Our findings of substance-specific EEG characteristics can provide information to help improve automated burst suppression detection in monitoring devices. More specific detection of burst suppression may be helpful to reduce excessive EEG effects of anesthesia and therefore the incidence of adverse outcomes such as POD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6160564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61605642018-10-08 Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns Fleischmann, Antonia Pilge, Stefanie Kiel, Tobias Kratzer, Stephan Schneider, Gerhard Kreuzer, Matthias Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Different anesthetic agents induce burst suppression in the electroencephalogram (EEG) at very deep levels of general anesthesia. EEG burst suppression has been identified to be a risk factor for postoperative delirium (POD). EEG based automated detection algorithms are used to detect burst suppression patterns during general anesthesia and a burst suppression ratio (BSR) is calculated. Unfortunately, applied algorithms do not give information as precisely as suggested, often resulting in an underestimation of the patients’ burst suppression level. Additional knowledge of substance-specific burst suppression patterns could be of great importance to improve the ability of EEG based monitors to detect burst suppression. In a re-analysis of EEG recordings obtained from a previous study, we analyzed EEG data of 45 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The patients were anesthetized with sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol (n = 15, for each group). After skin incision, the used agent was titrated to a level when burst suppression occurred. In a visual analysis of the EEG, blinded to the used anesthetic agent, we included the first distinct burst in our analysis. To avoid bias through changing EEG dynamics throughout the burst, we only focused on the first 2 s of the burst. These episodes were analyzed using the power spectral density (PSD) and normalized PSD, the absolute burst amplitude and absolute burst slope, as well as permutation entropy (PeEn). Our results show significant substance-specific differences in the architecture of the burst. Volatile-induced bursts showed higher burst amplitudes and higher burst power. Propofol-induced bursts had significantly higher relative power in the EEG alpha-range. Further, isoflurane-induced bursts had the steepest burst slopes. We can present the first systematic comparison of substance-specific burst characteristics during anesthesia. Previous observations, mostly derived from animal studies, pointing out the substance-specific differences in bursting behavior, concur with our findings. Our findings of substance-specific EEG characteristics can provide information to help improve automated burst suppression detection in monitoring devices. More specific detection of burst suppression may be helpful to reduce excessive EEG effects of anesthesia and therefore the incidence of adverse outcomes such as POD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6160564/ /pubmed/30297992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00368 Text en Copyright © 2018 Fleischmann, Pilge, Kiel, Kratzer, Schneider and Kreuzer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fleischmann, Antonia
Pilge, Stefanie
Kiel, Tobias
Kratzer, Stephan
Schneider, Gerhard
Kreuzer, Matthias
Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns
title Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns
title_full Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns
title_fullStr Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns
title_short Substance-Specific Differences in Human Electroencephalographic Burst Suppression Patterns
title_sort substance-specific differences in human electroencephalographic burst suppression patterns
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30297992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00368
work_keys_str_mv AT fleischmannantonia substancespecificdifferencesinhumanelectroencephalographicburstsuppressionpatterns
AT pilgestefanie substancespecificdifferencesinhumanelectroencephalographicburstsuppressionpatterns
AT kieltobias substancespecificdifferencesinhumanelectroencephalographicburstsuppressionpatterns
AT kratzerstephan substancespecificdifferencesinhumanelectroencephalographicburstsuppressionpatterns
AT schneidergerhard substancespecificdifferencesinhumanelectroencephalographicburstsuppressionpatterns
AT kreuzermatthias substancespecificdifferencesinhumanelectroencephalographicburstsuppressionpatterns