Cargando…

The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact

Over recent years, there has been growing interest in Healthy Universities, evidenced by an increased number of national networks and the participation of 375 participants from over 30 countries in the 2015 International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges, which also saw the la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dooris, Mark, Farrier, Alan, Doherty, Sharon, Holt, Maxine, Monk, Robert, Powell, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw099
_version_ 1783358869474377728
author Dooris, Mark
Farrier, Alan
Doherty, Sharon
Holt, Maxine
Monk, Robert
Powell, Susan
author_facet Dooris, Mark
Farrier, Alan
Doherty, Sharon
Holt, Maxine
Monk, Robert
Powell, Susan
author_sort Dooris, Mark
collection PubMed
description Over recent years, there has been growing interest in Healthy Universities, evidenced by an increased number of national networks and the participation of 375 participants from over 30 countries in the 2015 International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges, which also saw the launch of the Okanagan Charter. This paper reports on research exploring the use and impact of the UK Healthy Universities Network’s self review tool, specifically examining whether this has supported universities to understand and embed a whole system approach. The research study comprised two stages, the first using an online questionnaire and the second using focus groups. The findings revealed a wide range of perspectives under five overarching themes: motivations; process; outcomes/benefits; challenges/suggested improvements; and future use. In summary, the self review tool was extremely valuable and, when engaged with fully, offered significant benefits to universities seeking to improve the health and wellbeing of their communities. These benefits were felt by institutions at different stages in the journey and spanned outcome and process dimensions: not only did the tool offer an engaging and user-friendly means of undertaking internal benchmarking, generating an easy-to-understand report summarizing strengths and weaknesses; it also proved useful in building understanding of the whole system Healthy Universities approach and served as a catalyst to effective cross-university and cross-sectoral partnership working. Additionally, areas for potential enhancement were identified, offering opportunities to increase the tool’s utility further whilst engaging actively in the development of a global movement for Healthy Universities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6160901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61609012018-10-02 The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact Dooris, Mark Farrier, Alan Doherty, Sharon Holt, Maxine Monk, Robert Powell, Susan Health Promot Int Original Articles Over recent years, there has been growing interest in Healthy Universities, evidenced by an increased number of national networks and the participation of 375 participants from over 30 countries in the 2015 International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges, which also saw the launch of the Okanagan Charter. This paper reports on research exploring the use and impact of the UK Healthy Universities Network’s self review tool, specifically examining whether this has supported universities to understand and embed a whole system approach. The research study comprised two stages, the first using an online questionnaire and the second using focus groups. The findings revealed a wide range of perspectives under five overarching themes: motivations; process; outcomes/benefits; challenges/suggested improvements; and future use. In summary, the self review tool was extremely valuable and, when engaged with fully, offered significant benefits to universities seeking to improve the health and wellbeing of their communities. These benefits were felt by institutions at different stages in the journey and spanned outcome and process dimensions: not only did the tool offer an engaging and user-friendly means of undertaking internal benchmarking, generating an easy-to-understand report summarizing strengths and weaknesses; it also proved useful in building understanding of the whole system Healthy Universities approach and served as a catalyst to effective cross-university and cross-sectoral partnership working. Additionally, areas for potential enhancement were identified, offering opportunities to increase the tool’s utility further whilst engaging actively in the development of a global movement for Healthy Universities. Oxford University Press 2018-06 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6160901/ /pubmed/28011661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw099 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dooris, Mark
Farrier, Alan
Doherty, Sharon
Holt, Maxine
Monk, Robert
Powell, Susan
The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
title The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
title_full The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
title_fullStr The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
title_full_unstemmed The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
title_short The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
title_sort uk healthy universities self-review tool: whole system impact
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw099
work_keys_str_mv AT doorismark theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT farrieralan theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT dohertysharon theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT holtmaxine theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT monkrobert theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT powellsusan theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT doorismark ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT farrieralan ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT dohertysharon ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT holtmaxine ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT monkrobert ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact
AT powellsusan ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact