Cargando…
The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact
Over recent years, there has been growing interest in Healthy Universities, evidenced by an increased number of national networks and the participation of 375 participants from over 30 countries in the 2015 International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges, which also saw the la...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw099 |
_version_ | 1783358869474377728 |
---|---|
author | Dooris, Mark Farrier, Alan Doherty, Sharon Holt, Maxine Monk, Robert Powell, Susan |
author_facet | Dooris, Mark Farrier, Alan Doherty, Sharon Holt, Maxine Monk, Robert Powell, Susan |
author_sort | Dooris, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over recent years, there has been growing interest in Healthy Universities, evidenced by an increased number of national networks and the participation of 375 participants from over 30 countries in the 2015 International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges, which also saw the launch of the Okanagan Charter. This paper reports on research exploring the use and impact of the UK Healthy Universities Network’s self review tool, specifically examining whether this has supported universities to understand and embed a whole system approach. The research study comprised two stages, the first using an online questionnaire and the second using focus groups. The findings revealed a wide range of perspectives under five overarching themes: motivations; process; outcomes/benefits; challenges/suggested improvements; and future use. In summary, the self review tool was extremely valuable and, when engaged with fully, offered significant benefits to universities seeking to improve the health and wellbeing of their communities. These benefits were felt by institutions at different stages in the journey and spanned outcome and process dimensions: not only did the tool offer an engaging and user-friendly means of undertaking internal benchmarking, generating an easy-to-understand report summarizing strengths and weaknesses; it also proved useful in building understanding of the whole system Healthy Universities approach and served as a catalyst to effective cross-university and cross-sectoral partnership working. Additionally, areas for potential enhancement were identified, offering opportunities to increase the tool’s utility further whilst engaging actively in the development of a global movement for Healthy Universities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6160901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61609012018-10-02 The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact Dooris, Mark Farrier, Alan Doherty, Sharon Holt, Maxine Monk, Robert Powell, Susan Health Promot Int Original Articles Over recent years, there has been growing interest in Healthy Universities, evidenced by an increased number of national networks and the participation of 375 participants from over 30 countries in the 2015 International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges, which also saw the launch of the Okanagan Charter. This paper reports on research exploring the use and impact of the UK Healthy Universities Network’s self review tool, specifically examining whether this has supported universities to understand and embed a whole system approach. The research study comprised two stages, the first using an online questionnaire and the second using focus groups. The findings revealed a wide range of perspectives under five overarching themes: motivations; process; outcomes/benefits; challenges/suggested improvements; and future use. In summary, the self review tool was extremely valuable and, when engaged with fully, offered significant benefits to universities seeking to improve the health and wellbeing of their communities. These benefits were felt by institutions at different stages in the journey and spanned outcome and process dimensions: not only did the tool offer an engaging and user-friendly means of undertaking internal benchmarking, generating an easy-to-understand report summarizing strengths and weaknesses; it also proved useful in building understanding of the whole system Healthy Universities approach and served as a catalyst to effective cross-university and cross-sectoral partnership working. Additionally, areas for potential enhancement were identified, offering opportunities to increase the tool’s utility further whilst engaging actively in the development of a global movement for Healthy Universities. Oxford University Press 2018-06 2016-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6160901/ /pubmed/28011661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw099 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Dooris, Mark Farrier, Alan Doherty, Sharon Holt, Maxine Monk, Robert Powell, Susan The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact |
title | The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact |
title_full | The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact |
title_fullStr | The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact |
title_full_unstemmed | The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact |
title_short | The UK Healthy Universities Self-Review Tool: Whole System Impact |
title_sort | uk healthy universities self-review tool: whole system impact |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6160901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28011661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doorismark theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT farrieralan theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT dohertysharon theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT holtmaxine theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT monkrobert theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT powellsusan theukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT doorismark ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT farrieralan ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT dohertysharon ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT holtmaxine ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT monkrobert ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact AT powellsusan ukhealthyuniversitiesselfreviewtoolwholesystemimpact |