Cargando…
Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls
Epigenetic modifications contribute to the determination of cell fate and differentiation. The molecular mechanisms underlying histone variants and post-translational modifications (PTMs) have been studied in the contexts of development, differentiation, and disease. Antibody-based assays have class...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6030029 |
_version_ | 1783358917800099840 |
---|---|
author | El Kennani, Sara Crespo, Marion Govin, Jérôme Pflieger, Delphine |
author_facet | El Kennani, Sara Crespo, Marion Govin, Jérôme Pflieger, Delphine |
author_sort | El Kennani, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epigenetic modifications contribute to the determination of cell fate and differentiation. The molecular mechanisms underlying histone variants and post-translational modifications (PTMs) have been studied in the contexts of development, differentiation, and disease. Antibody-based assays have classically been used to target PTMs, but these approaches fail to reveal combinatorial patterns of modifications. In addition, some histone variants are so similar to canonical histones that antibodies have difficulty distinguishing between these isoforms. Mass spectrometry (MS) has progressively developed as a powerful technology for the study of histone variants and their PTMs. Indeed, MS analyses highlighted exquisitely complex combinations of PTMs, suggesting “crosstalk” between them, and also revealed that PTM patterns are often variant-specific. Even though the sensitivity and acquisition speed of MS instruments have considerably increased alongside the development of computational tools for the study of multiple PTMs, it remains challenging to correctly describe the landscape of histone PTMs, and in particular to confidently assign modifications to specific amino acids. Here, we provide an inventory of MS-based strategies and of the pitfalls inherent to histone PTM and variant characterization, while stressing the complex interplay between PTMs and histone sequence variations. We will particularly illustrate the roles played by MS-based analyses in identifying and quantifying histone variants and modifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6161106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61611062018-10-01 Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls El Kennani, Sara Crespo, Marion Govin, Jérôme Pflieger, Delphine Proteomes Review Epigenetic modifications contribute to the determination of cell fate and differentiation. The molecular mechanisms underlying histone variants and post-translational modifications (PTMs) have been studied in the contexts of development, differentiation, and disease. Antibody-based assays have classically been used to target PTMs, but these approaches fail to reveal combinatorial patterns of modifications. In addition, some histone variants are so similar to canonical histones that antibodies have difficulty distinguishing between these isoforms. Mass spectrometry (MS) has progressively developed as a powerful technology for the study of histone variants and their PTMs. Indeed, MS analyses highlighted exquisitely complex combinations of PTMs, suggesting “crosstalk” between them, and also revealed that PTM patterns are often variant-specific. Even though the sensitivity and acquisition speed of MS instruments have considerably increased alongside the development of computational tools for the study of multiple PTMs, it remains challenging to correctly describe the landscape of histone PTMs, and in particular to confidently assign modifications to specific amino acids. Here, we provide an inventory of MS-based strategies and of the pitfalls inherent to histone PTM and variant characterization, while stressing the complex interplay between PTMs and histone sequence variations. We will particularly illustrate the roles played by MS-based analyses in identifying and quantifying histone variants and modifications. MDPI 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6161106/ /pubmed/29933573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6030029 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review El Kennani, Sara Crespo, Marion Govin, Jérôme Pflieger, Delphine Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls |
title | Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls |
title_full | Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls |
title_fullStr | Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls |
title_full_unstemmed | Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls |
title_short | Proteomic Analysis of Histone Variants and Their PTMs: Strategies and Pitfalls |
title_sort | proteomic analysis of histone variants and their ptms: strategies and pitfalls |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29933573 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proteomes6030029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elkennanisara proteomicanalysisofhistonevariantsandtheirptmsstrategiesandpitfalls AT crespomarion proteomicanalysisofhistonevariantsandtheirptmsstrategiesandpitfalls AT govinjerome proteomicanalysisofhistonevariantsandtheirptmsstrategiesandpitfalls AT pfliegerdelphine proteomicanalysisofhistonevariantsandtheirptmsstrategiesandpitfalls |