Cargando…

The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain

Vaccination is one of the most effective tools for limiting the impact of equine influenza (EI). The humoral immunity established following a primary vaccination course can decrease significantly between the second (V2) and third immunisations (V3), leaving some horses insufficiently protected for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paillot, Romain, Garrett, Dion, Lopez-Alvarez, Maria R., Birand, Ihlan, Montesso, Fernando, Horspool, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30004410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6030038
_version_ 1783358920141570048
author Paillot, Romain
Garrett, Dion
Lopez-Alvarez, Maria R.
Birand, Ihlan
Montesso, Fernando
Horspool, Linda
author_facet Paillot, Romain
Garrett, Dion
Lopez-Alvarez, Maria R.
Birand, Ihlan
Montesso, Fernando
Horspool, Linda
author_sort Paillot, Romain
collection PubMed
description Vaccination is one of the most effective tools for limiting the impact of equine influenza (EI). The humoral immunity established following a primary vaccination course can decrease significantly between the second (V2) and third immunisations (V3), leaving some horses insufficiently protected for several weeks. This so-called “immunity gap” poses a challenge to all EI vaccines. During this period, the EI infection of vaccinated animals may be followed by marked clinical signs and virus shedding. However, several EI vaccines have been shown to stimulate equine influenza virus (EIV)-specific cell-mediated immunity, which is likely to play a role in protection against EIV infection and/or mitigate the clinical and virological signs of EI. Reducing the interval between V2 and V3 has been shown to be counterproductive to longer-term immunity. Further research is needed to define and address the “immunity gap” in horses. This study aimed to measure the level of protection induced by a whole inactivated, ISCOMatrix adjuvanted, EI and tetanus vaccine (Equilis Prequenza-Te) when challenged during the immunity gap (i.e., immediately before the recommended boost immunisation, more than 5 months after V2) using infection with a recent heterologous Florida Clade 2 (FC2) equine influenza virus (EIV) strain. This vaccine was tested in a Welsh mountain pony model. A group of seven ponies was vaccinated twice, 4 weeks apart. The protective antibody response was measured and ponies were challenged, along with 5 unvaccinated control ponies, by experimental infection with the FC2 A/eq/Northamptonshire/1/13 EIV strain, 158 days (around 5.2 months) after V2 and their clinical signs and virus shedding were monitored. EI serology was measured by single radial haemolysis (SRH) and haemagglutination inhibition (HI). Clinical signs and virus shedding (measured by qRT-PCR and hen’s egg titration) were compared with controls. All vaccinates had detectable, low SRH antibody titres and most had detectable, low HI titres. Significant clinical and virological protection was observed in vaccinates (p < 0.05), supporting the good performance of this vaccine against a recent EIV strain. In this study, the impact of the immunity gap in ponies was limited after primary vaccination with this whole inactivated, ISCOMatrix adjuvanted EI and tetanus vaccine (Equilis Prequenza-Te) when infected several months after V2 with a recent FC2 strain, which is representative of EIV circulating in the EU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6161116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61611162018-10-01 The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain Paillot, Romain Garrett, Dion Lopez-Alvarez, Maria R. Birand, Ihlan Montesso, Fernando Horspool, Linda Vaccines (Basel) Article Vaccination is one of the most effective tools for limiting the impact of equine influenza (EI). The humoral immunity established following a primary vaccination course can decrease significantly between the second (V2) and third immunisations (V3), leaving some horses insufficiently protected for several weeks. This so-called “immunity gap” poses a challenge to all EI vaccines. During this period, the EI infection of vaccinated animals may be followed by marked clinical signs and virus shedding. However, several EI vaccines have been shown to stimulate equine influenza virus (EIV)-specific cell-mediated immunity, which is likely to play a role in protection against EIV infection and/or mitigate the clinical and virological signs of EI. Reducing the interval between V2 and V3 has been shown to be counterproductive to longer-term immunity. Further research is needed to define and address the “immunity gap” in horses. This study aimed to measure the level of protection induced by a whole inactivated, ISCOMatrix adjuvanted, EI and tetanus vaccine (Equilis Prequenza-Te) when challenged during the immunity gap (i.e., immediately before the recommended boost immunisation, more than 5 months after V2) using infection with a recent heterologous Florida Clade 2 (FC2) equine influenza virus (EIV) strain. This vaccine was tested in a Welsh mountain pony model. A group of seven ponies was vaccinated twice, 4 weeks apart. The protective antibody response was measured and ponies were challenged, along with 5 unvaccinated control ponies, by experimental infection with the FC2 A/eq/Northamptonshire/1/13 EIV strain, 158 days (around 5.2 months) after V2 and their clinical signs and virus shedding were monitored. EI serology was measured by single radial haemolysis (SRH) and haemagglutination inhibition (HI). Clinical signs and virus shedding (measured by qRT-PCR and hen’s egg titration) were compared with controls. All vaccinates had detectable, low SRH antibody titres and most had detectable, low HI titres. Significant clinical and virological protection was observed in vaccinates (p < 0.05), supporting the good performance of this vaccine against a recent EIV strain. In this study, the impact of the immunity gap in ponies was limited after primary vaccination with this whole inactivated, ISCOMatrix adjuvanted EI and tetanus vaccine (Equilis Prequenza-Te) when infected several months after V2 with a recent FC2 strain, which is representative of EIV circulating in the EU. MDPI 2018-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6161116/ /pubmed/30004410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6030038 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paillot, Romain
Garrett, Dion
Lopez-Alvarez, Maria R.
Birand, Ihlan
Montesso, Fernando
Horspool, Linda
The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain
title The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain
title_full The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain
title_fullStr The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain
title_full_unstemmed The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain
title_short The Immunity Gap Challenge: Protection against a Recent Florida Clade 2 Equine Influenza Strain
title_sort immunity gap challenge: protection against a recent florida clade 2 equine influenza strain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30004410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines6030038
work_keys_str_mv AT paillotromain theimmunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT garrettdion theimmunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT lopezalvarezmariar theimmunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT birandihlan theimmunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT montessofernando theimmunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT horspoollinda theimmunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT paillotromain immunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT garrettdion immunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT lopezalvarezmariar immunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT birandihlan immunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT montessofernando immunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain
AT horspoollinda immunitygapchallengeprotectionagainstarecentfloridaclade2equineinfluenzastrain