Cargando…

Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review

Application of conventional polymeric membranes in CO(2) separation processes are limited by the existing trade-off between permeability and selectivity represented by the renowned upper bound. Addition of porous nanofillers in polymeric membranes is a promising approach to transcend the upper bound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadi, Mahdi, Janakiram, Saravanan, Dai, Zhongde, Ansaloni, Luca, Deng, Liyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030050
_version_ 1783358945153253376
author Ahmadi, Mahdi
Janakiram, Saravanan
Dai, Zhongde
Ansaloni, Luca
Deng, Liyuan
author_facet Ahmadi, Mahdi
Janakiram, Saravanan
Dai, Zhongde
Ansaloni, Luca
Deng, Liyuan
author_sort Ahmadi, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description Application of conventional polymeric membranes in CO(2) separation processes are limited by the existing trade-off between permeability and selectivity represented by the renowned upper bound. Addition of porous nanofillers in polymeric membranes is a promising approach to transcend the upper bound, owing to their superior separation capabilities. Porous nanofillers entice increased attention over nonporous counterparts due to their inherent CO(2) uptake capacities and secondary transport pathways when added to polymer matrices. Infinite possibilities of tuning the porous architecture of these nanofillers also facilitate simultaneous enhancement of permeability, selectivity and stability features of the membrane conveniently heading in the direction towards industrial realization. This review focuses on presenting a complete synopsis of inherent capacities of several porous nanofillers, like metal organic frameworks (MOFs), Zeolites, and porous organic frameworks (POFs) and the effects on their addition to polymeric membranes. Gas permeation performances of select hybrids with these three-dimensional (3D) fillers and porous nanosheets have been summarized and discussed with respect to each type. Consequently, the benefits and shortcomings of each class of materials have been outlined and future research directions concerning the hybrids with 3D fillers have been suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6161244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61612442018-09-28 Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review Ahmadi, Mahdi Janakiram, Saravanan Dai, Zhongde Ansaloni, Luca Deng, Liyuan Membranes (Basel) Review Application of conventional polymeric membranes in CO(2) separation processes are limited by the existing trade-off between permeability and selectivity represented by the renowned upper bound. Addition of porous nanofillers in polymeric membranes is a promising approach to transcend the upper bound, owing to their superior separation capabilities. Porous nanofillers entice increased attention over nonporous counterparts due to their inherent CO(2) uptake capacities and secondary transport pathways when added to polymer matrices. Infinite possibilities of tuning the porous architecture of these nanofillers also facilitate simultaneous enhancement of permeability, selectivity and stability features of the membrane conveniently heading in the direction towards industrial realization. This review focuses on presenting a complete synopsis of inherent capacities of several porous nanofillers, like metal organic frameworks (MOFs), Zeolites, and porous organic frameworks (POFs) and the effects on their addition to polymeric membranes. Gas permeation performances of select hybrids with these three-dimensional (3D) fillers and porous nanosheets have been summarized and discussed with respect to each type. Consequently, the benefits and shortcomings of each class of materials have been outlined and future research directions concerning the hybrids with 3D fillers have been suggested. MDPI 2018-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6161244/ /pubmed/30060592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030050 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ahmadi, Mahdi
Janakiram, Saravanan
Dai, Zhongde
Ansaloni, Luca
Deng, Liyuan
Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review
title Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review
title_full Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review
title_fullStr Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review
title_short Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Porous Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Fillers for CO(2) Separation: A Review
title_sort performance of mixed matrix membranes containing porous two-dimensional (2d) and three-dimensional (3d) fillers for co(2) separation: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060592
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes8030050
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadimahdi performanceofmixedmatrixmembranescontainingporoustwodimensional2dandthreedimensional3dfillersforco2separationareview
AT janakiramsaravanan performanceofmixedmatrixmembranescontainingporoustwodimensional2dandthreedimensional3dfillersforco2separationareview
AT daizhongde performanceofmixedmatrixmembranescontainingporoustwodimensional2dandthreedimensional3dfillersforco2separationareview
AT ansaloniluca performanceofmixedmatrixmembranescontainingporoustwodimensional2dandthreedimensional3dfillersforco2separationareview
AT dengliyuan performanceofmixedmatrixmembranescontainingporoustwodimensional2dandthreedimensional3dfillersforco2separationareview