Cargando…
Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study
BACKGROUND: A reanalysis of the ALBIOS trial suggested that patients with septic shock - defined by vasopressor-dependent hypotension in the presence of severe sepsis (Shock-2) - had a survival benefit when treated with albumin. The new septic shock definition (Shock-3) added the criterion of a lact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2169-8 |
_version_ | 1783358966448783360 |
---|---|
author | Vasques, Francesco Duscio, Eleonora Romitti, Federica Pasticci, Iacopo Caironi, Pietro Meessen, Jennifer Latini, Roberto Cressoni, Massimo Camporota, Luigi Pesenti, Antonio Fumagalli, Roberto Quintel, Michael Gattinoni, Luciano |
author_facet | Vasques, Francesco Duscio, Eleonora Romitti, Federica Pasticci, Iacopo Caironi, Pietro Meessen, Jennifer Latini, Roberto Cressoni, Massimo Camporota, Luigi Pesenti, Antonio Fumagalli, Roberto Quintel, Michael Gattinoni, Luciano |
author_sort | Vasques, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A reanalysis of the ALBIOS trial suggested that patients with septic shock - defined by vasopressor-dependent hypotension in the presence of severe sepsis (Shock-2) - had a survival benefit when treated with albumin. The new septic shock definition (Shock-3) added the criterion of a lactate threshold of 2 mmol/L. We investigated how the populations defined according to Shock-2 and Shock-3 differed and whether the albumin benefit would be confirmed. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the ALBIOS study, a randomized controlled study conducted between 2008 and 2012 in 100 intensive care units in Italy comparing the administration of 20% albumin and crystalloids versus crystalloids alone in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. We analyzed data from 1741 patients from ALBIOS with serum lactate measurement available at baseline. We compared group size, physiological variables and 90-day mortality between patients defined by Shock-2 and Shock-3 and between the albumin and crystalloid treatment groups. RESULTS: We compared the Shock-2 and the Shock-3 definitions and the albumin and crystalloid treatment groups in terms of group size and physiological, laboratory and outcome variables. The Shock-3 definition reduced the population with shock by 34%. The Shock-3 group had higher lactate (p < 0.001), greater resuscitation-fluid requirement (p = 0.014), higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (p < 0.001) and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores (p = 0.022), lower platelet count (p = 0.002) and higher 90-day mortality (46.7% vs 51.9%; p = 0.031). Albumin decreased mortality in Shock-2 patients compared to crystalloids (43.5% vs 49.9%; 12.6% relative risk reduction; p = 0.04). In patients defined by Shock-3 a similar benefit was observed for albumin with a 11.3% relative risk reduction (48.7% vs 54.9%; 11.3% relative risk reduction; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The Sepsis-3 definition reduced the size of the population with shock and showed a similar effect size in the benefits of albumin. The Shock-3 criteria will markedly slow patients’ recruitment rates, in view of testing albumin in septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00707122. Registered on 30 June 2008. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6161337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61613372018-10-01 Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study Vasques, Francesco Duscio, Eleonora Romitti, Federica Pasticci, Iacopo Caironi, Pietro Meessen, Jennifer Latini, Roberto Cressoni, Massimo Camporota, Luigi Pesenti, Antonio Fumagalli, Roberto Quintel, Michael Gattinoni, Luciano Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: A reanalysis of the ALBIOS trial suggested that patients with septic shock - defined by vasopressor-dependent hypotension in the presence of severe sepsis (Shock-2) - had a survival benefit when treated with albumin. The new septic shock definition (Shock-3) added the criterion of a lactate threshold of 2 mmol/L. We investigated how the populations defined according to Shock-2 and Shock-3 differed and whether the albumin benefit would be confirmed. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the ALBIOS study, a randomized controlled study conducted between 2008 and 2012 in 100 intensive care units in Italy comparing the administration of 20% albumin and crystalloids versus crystalloids alone in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. We analyzed data from 1741 patients from ALBIOS with serum lactate measurement available at baseline. We compared group size, physiological variables and 90-day mortality between patients defined by Shock-2 and Shock-3 and between the albumin and crystalloid treatment groups. RESULTS: We compared the Shock-2 and the Shock-3 definitions and the albumin and crystalloid treatment groups in terms of group size and physiological, laboratory and outcome variables. The Shock-3 definition reduced the population with shock by 34%. The Shock-3 group had higher lactate (p < 0.001), greater resuscitation-fluid requirement (p = 0.014), higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (p < 0.001) and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores (p = 0.022), lower platelet count (p = 0.002) and higher 90-day mortality (46.7% vs 51.9%; p = 0.031). Albumin decreased mortality in Shock-2 patients compared to crystalloids (43.5% vs 49.9%; 12.6% relative risk reduction; p = 0.04). In patients defined by Shock-3 a similar benefit was observed for albumin with a 11.3% relative risk reduction (48.7% vs 54.9%; 11.3% relative risk reduction; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The Sepsis-3 definition reduced the size of the population with shock and showed a similar effect size in the benefits of albumin. The Shock-3 criteria will markedly slow patients’ recruitment rates, in view of testing albumin in septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00707122. Registered on 30 June 2008. BioMed Central 2018-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6161337/ /pubmed/30261898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2169-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Vasques, Francesco Duscio, Eleonora Romitti, Federica Pasticci, Iacopo Caironi, Pietro Meessen, Jennifer Latini, Roberto Cressoni, Massimo Camporota, Luigi Pesenti, Antonio Fumagalli, Roberto Quintel, Michael Gattinoni, Luciano Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study |
title | Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study |
title_full | Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study |
title_fullStr | Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study |
title_short | Septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the ALBIOS study |
title_sort | septic shock-3 vs 2: an analysis of the albios study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2169-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vasquesfrancesco septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT duscioeleonora septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT romittifederica septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT pasticciiacopo septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT caironipietro septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT meessenjennifer septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT latiniroberto septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT cressonimassimo septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT camporotaluigi septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT pesentiantonio septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT fumagalliroberto septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT quintelmichael septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy AT gattinoniluciano septicshock3vs2ananalysisofthealbiosstudy |