Cargando…
Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up
BACKGROUND: The restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) often poses a challenge to the clinician. Various restorative materials are available in the market for the restoration of the same. Each material has various advantages and shortcomings. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_18 |
_version_ | 1783359004142993408 |
---|---|
author | Hussainy, Syed Nazia Nasim, Iffat Thomas, Toby Ranjan, Manish |
author_facet | Hussainy, Syed Nazia Nasim, Iffat Thomas, Toby Ranjan, Manish |
author_sort | Hussainy, Syed Nazia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) often poses a challenge to the clinician. Various restorative materials are available in the market for the restoration of the same. Each material has various advantages and shortcomings. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare and to evaluate the clinical performance of capsulated resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), flowable composite, and polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR) in NCCLs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 101 restorations were placed among healthy controls in this clinical trial. A total of 101 restorations were divided into three groups with n = minimum 32 per group (Group 1: 33 restorations, Group 2: 34 restorations, and Group 3: 34 restorations). The restorative materials used were capsulated RMGIC, flowable composite and PMCR. After the placement, the restorations were evaluated for the United States Public Health Services criteria for six parameters, namely retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, color stability, surface roughness, and sensitivity. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistics was performed using SPSS 21.0 version. Chi-square test was done to compare the proportions between groups. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportion change between time points. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference seen among the three groups for retention, color stability, surface roughness, and hypersensitivity. RMGIC had shown superior characteristics in marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration compared to flowable composite and PMCR, and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, all the three restorative materials are clinically acceptable for the restoration of NCCLs. RMGIC is superior regarding marginal adaptation and esthetics for restoring NCCLs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6161514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61615142018-10-05 Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up Hussainy, Syed Nazia Nasim, Iffat Thomas, Toby Ranjan, Manish J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) often poses a challenge to the clinician. Various restorative materials are available in the market for the restoration of the same. Each material has various advantages and shortcomings. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare and to evaluate the clinical performance of capsulated resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), flowable composite, and polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR) in NCCLs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 101 restorations were placed among healthy controls in this clinical trial. A total of 101 restorations were divided into three groups with n = minimum 32 per group (Group 1: 33 restorations, Group 2: 34 restorations, and Group 3: 34 restorations). The restorative materials used were capsulated RMGIC, flowable composite and PMCR. After the placement, the restorations were evaluated for the United States Public Health Services criteria for six parameters, namely retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, color stability, surface roughness, and sensitivity. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistics was performed using SPSS 21.0 version. Chi-square test was done to compare the proportions between groups. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportion change between time points. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference seen among the three groups for retention, color stability, surface roughness, and hypersensitivity. RMGIC had shown superior characteristics in marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration compared to flowable composite and PMCR, and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, all the three restorative materials are clinically acceptable for the restoration of NCCLs. RMGIC is superior regarding marginal adaptation and esthetics for restoring NCCLs. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6161514/ /pubmed/30294112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hussainy, Syed Nazia Nasim, Iffat Thomas, Toby Ranjan, Manish Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up |
title | Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up |
title_full | Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up |
title_fullStr | Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up |
title_short | Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up |
title_sort | clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: one-year follow-up |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hussainysyednazia clinicalperformanceofresinmodifiedglassionomercementflowablecompositeandpolyacidmodifiedresincompositeinnoncariouscervicallesionsoneyearfollowup AT nasimiffat clinicalperformanceofresinmodifiedglassionomercementflowablecompositeandpolyacidmodifiedresincompositeinnoncariouscervicallesionsoneyearfollowup AT thomastoby clinicalperformanceofresinmodifiedglassionomercementflowablecompositeandpolyacidmodifiedresincompositeinnoncariouscervicallesionsoneyearfollowup AT ranjanmanish clinicalperformanceofresinmodifiedglassionomercementflowablecompositeandpolyacidmodifiedresincompositeinnoncariouscervicallesionsoneyearfollowup |