Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis

INTRODUCTION: Dental erosion is defined as the loss of tooth structure due to chemical process that does not involve bacteria. The management of such a condition calls for a comprehensive approach to identifying the cause and treating it. AIM: The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nandakumar, Mahalakshmi, Nasim, Iffat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294113
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_110_18
_version_ 1783359008567984128
author Nandakumar, Mahalakshmi
Nasim, Iffat
author_facet Nandakumar, Mahalakshmi
Nasim, Iffat
author_sort Nandakumar, Mahalakshmi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dental erosion is defined as the loss of tooth structure due to chemical process that does not involve bacteria. The management of such a condition calls for a comprehensive approach to identifying the cause and treating it. AIM: The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the role of grape seed extract (GSE) and cranberry extract (CE) in preventing dental erosion using optical emission spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prepared enamel specimens were subjected to the erosive challenge using HCl for 10 s, followed by immersion in experimental natural groups and control fluoride group for 30 s and artificial saliva for 60 min. This cycle was repeated three times. The amounts of calcium and phosphorous present in the acid solution after 1(st), 2(nd), and 3(rd) erosive challenges were determined for each group using induced coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. RESULTS: The cumulative calcium and phosphorous release after the 1(st), 2(nd), and 3(rd) erosive challenges were found to be the least in SnF2 group, followed by GSE group and then in CE group. CONCLUSION: The protective of GSE and CE was inferior to the gold standard control group of stannous fluoride role, against enamel erosion. GSE showed better remineralizing effect; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6161533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61615332018-10-05 Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis Nandakumar, Mahalakshmi Nasim, Iffat J Conserv Dent Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Dental erosion is defined as the loss of tooth structure due to chemical process that does not involve bacteria. The management of such a condition calls for a comprehensive approach to identifying the cause and treating it. AIM: The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the role of grape seed extract (GSE) and cranberry extract (CE) in preventing dental erosion using optical emission spectrometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prepared enamel specimens were subjected to the erosive challenge using HCl for 10 s, followed by immersion in experimental natural groups and control fluoride group for 30 s and artificial saliva for 60 min. This cycle was repeated three times. The amounts of calcium and phosphorous present in the acid solution after 1(st), 2(nd), and 3(rd) erosive challenges were determined for each group using induced coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. RESULTS: The cumulative calcium and phosphorous release after the 1(st), 2(nd), and 3(rd) erosive challenges were found to be the least in SnF2 group, followed by GSE group and then in CE group. CONCLUSION: The protective of GSE and CE was inferior to the gold standard control group of stannous fluoride role, against enamel erosion. GSE showed better remineralizing effect; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6161533/ /pubmed/30294113 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_110_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Nandakumar, Mahalakshmi
Nasim, Iffat
Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis
title Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis
title_full Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis
title_short Comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis
title_sort comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing enamel erosion: an optical emission spectrometric analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30294113
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_110_18
work_keys_str_mv AT nandakumarmahalakshmi comparativeevaluationofgrapeseedandcranberryextractsinpreventingenamelerosionanopticalemissionspectrometricanalysis
AT nasimiffat comparativeevaluationofgrapeseedandcranberryextractsinpreventingenamelerosionanopticalemissionspectrometricanalysis