Cargando…
Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
Systematic reviews of clinical trials aim to include all relevant studies conducted on a particular topic and to provide an unbiased summary of their results, producing the best evidence about the benefits and harms of medical treatments. Relevant studies, however, may not provide the results for al...
Autores principales: | Kirkham, Jamie J, Altman, Douglas G, Chan, An-Wen, Gamble, Carrol, Dwan, Kerry M, Williamson, Paula R |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30266736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3802 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Selective reporting in clinical trials - an examination of discrepancy rates in pre-specified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to the BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2008)