Cargando…

Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth

BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric transfusion mean that more women are entering subsequent pregnancies with a history of blood transfusion. This study investigates subsequent pregnancy outcomes of women with a prior obstetric red cell transfusion, compared to women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Jillian A., Nippita, Tanya, Randall, Deborah A., Irving, David O., Ford, Jane B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30265674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203195
_version_ 1783359064287215616
author Patterson, Jillian A.
Nippita, Tanya
Randall, Deborah A.
Irving, David O.
Ford, Jane B.
author_facet Patterson, Jillian A.
Nippita, Tanya
Randall, Deborah A.
Irving, David O.
Ford, Jane B.
author_sort Patterson, Jillian A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric transfusion mean that more women are entering subsequent pregnancies with a history of blood transfusion. This study investigates subsequent pregnancy outcomes of women with a prior obstetric red cell transfusion, compared to women without a transfusion. METHODS: All women with a first pregnancy resulting in a liveborn singleton infant of at least 20 weeks gestation delivering in hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, between 2003 and 2012 were included in the study, with followup for second births until June 2015. Linked hospital and births data were used to identify women with a transfusion and/or postpartum haemorrhage in their first birth, time to second pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes (including transfusion, postpartum haemorrhage and severe morbidity) in their subsequent birth. RESULTS: There were 358,384 singleton births to primiparous women, with 1.4% receiving an obstetric blood transfusion. Sixty-three percent of women had at least one subsequent birth. The relative risk (RR) of requiring a transfusion in a second birth was 4.9 (95% CI 4.1,6.1) for women with a previous transfusion compared with women without. The risk (RR) of severe morbidity in a second birth was 4.1 times higher (95% CI 2.2,7.4) for those receiving a transfusion without haemorrhage in their first birth compared with women with neither haemorrhage nor transfusion. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider a woman’s history of transfusion and/or haemorrhage as part of her obstetric history to ensure management in a manner that minimises risk in subsequent pregnancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6161869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61618692018-10-19 Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth Patterson, Jillian A. Nippita, Tanya Randall, Deborah A. Irving, David O. Ford, Jane B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric transfusion mean that more women are entering subsequent pregnancies with a history of blood transfusion. This study investigates subsequent pregnancy outcomes of women with a prior obstetric red cell transfusion, compared to women without a transfusion. METHODS: All women with a first pregnancy resulting in a liveborn singleton infant of at least 20 weeks gestation delivering in hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, between 2003 and 2012 were included in the study, with followup for second births until June 2015. Linked hospital and births data were used to identify women with a transfusion and/or postpartum haemorrhage in their first birth, time to second pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes (including transfusion, postpartum haemorrhage and severe morbidity) in their subsequent birth. RESULTS: There were 358,384 singleton births to primiparous women, with 1.4% receiving an obstetric blood transfusion. Sixty-three percent of women had at least one subsequent birth. The relative risk (RR) of requiring a transfusion in a second birth was 4.9 (95% CI 4.1,6.1) for women with a previous transfusion compared with women without. The risk (RR) of severe morbidity in a second birth was 4.1 times higher (95% CI 2.2,7.4) for those receiving a transfusion without haemorrhage in their first birth compared with women with neither haemorrhage nor transfusion. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider a woman’s history of transfusion and/or haemorrhage as part of her obstetric history to ensure management in a manner that minimises risk in subsequent pregnancies. Public Library of Science 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6161869/ /pubmed/30265674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203195 Text en © 2018 Patterson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patterson, Jillian A.
Nippita, Tanya
Randall, Deborah A.
Irving, David O.
Ford, Jane B.
Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
title Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
title_full Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
title_fullStr Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
title_short Outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
title_sort outcomes of subsequent pregnancy following obstetric transfusion in a first birth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6161869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30265674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203195
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonjilliana outcomesofsubsequentpregnancyfollowingobstetrictransfusioninafirstbirth
AT nippitatanya outcomesofsubsequentpregnancyfollowingobstetrictransfusioninafirstbirth
AT randalldeboraha outcomesofsubsequentpregnancyfollowingobstetrictransfusioninafirstbirth
AT irvingdavido outcomesofsubsequentpregnancyfollowingobstetrictransfusioninafirstbirth
AT fordjaneb outcomesofsubsequentpregnancyfollowingobstetrictransfusioninafirstbirth
AT outcomesofsubsequentpregnancyfollowingobstetrictransfusioninafirstbirth