Cargando…
The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans
Even though human fear-conditioning involves affective learning as well as expectancy learning, most studies assess only one of the two distinct processes. Commonly used read-outs of associative fear learning are the fear-potentiated startle reflex (FPS), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings. FP...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30267018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32646-1 |
_version_ | 1783359115432558592 |
---|---|
author | de Haan, Michelle I. C. van Well, Sonja Visser, Renée M. Scholte, H. Steven van Wingen, Guido A. Kindt, Merel |
author_facet | de Haan, Michelle I. C. van Well, Sonja Visser, Renée M. Scholte, H. Steven van Wingen, Guido A. Kindt, Merel |
author_sort | de Haan, Michelle I. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Even though human fear-conditioning involves affective learning as well as expectancy learning, most studies assess only one of the two distinct processes. Commonly used read-outs of associative fear learning are the fear-potentiated startle reflex (FPS), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings. FPS is thought to reflect the affective aspect of fear learning, while pupil dilation reflects a general arousal response. However, in order to measure FPS, aversively loud acoustic probes are presented during conditioning, which might in itself exert an effect on fear learning. Here we tested the effect of startle probes on fear learning by comparing brain activation (fMRI), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings with and without acoustic startle probes within subjects. Regardless of startle probes, fear conditioning resulted in enhanced dACC, insula and ventral striatum activation. Interaction analyses showed that startle probes diminished differential pupil dilation between CS+ and CS− due to increased pupil responses to CS−. A trend significant interaction effect was observed for US-expectancy and amygdala activation. Startle probes affect differential fear learning by impeding safety learning, as measured with pupil dilation, a read-out of the cognitive component of fear learning. However, we observed no significant effect of acoustic startle probes on other measures of fear learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6162305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61623052018-10-02 The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans de Haan, Michelle I. C. van Well, Sonja Visser, Renée M. Scholte, H. Steven van Wingen, Guido A. Kindt, Merel Sci Rep Article Even though human fear-conditioning involves affective learning as well as expectancy learning, most studies assess only one of the two distinct processes. Commonly used read-outs of associative fear learning are the fear-potentiated startle reflex (FPS), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings. FPS is thought to reflect the affective aspect of fear learning, while pupil dilation reflects a general arousal response. However, in order to measure FPS, aversively loud acoustic probes are presented during conditioning, which might in itself exert an effect on fear learning. Here we tested the effect of startle probes on fear learning by comparing brain activation (fMRI), pupil dilation and US-expectancy ratings with and without acoustic startle probes within subjects. Regardless of startle probes, fear conditioning resulted in enhanced dACC, insula and ventral striatum activation. Interaction analyses showed that startle probes diminished differential pupil dilation between CS+ and CS− due to increased pupil responses to CS−. A trend significant interaction effect was observed for US-expectancy and amygdala activation. Startle probes affect differential fear learning by impeding safety learning, as measured with pupil dilation, a read-out of the cognitive component of fear learning. However, we observed no significant effect of acoustic startle probes on other measures of fear learning. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6162305/ /pubmed/30267018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32646-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article de Haan, Michelle I. C. van Well, Sonja Visser, Renée M. Scholte, H. Steven van Wingen, Guido A. Kindt, Merel The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
title | The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
title_full | The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
title_fullStr | The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
title_short | The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
title_sort | influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30267018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32646-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehaanmichelleic theinfluenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT vanwellsonja theinfluenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT visserreneem theinfluenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT scholtehsteven theinfluenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT vanwingenguidoa theinfluenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT kindtmerel theinfluenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT dehaanmichelleic influenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT vanwellsonja influenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT visserreneem influenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT scholtehsteven influenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT vanwingenguidoa influenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans AT kindtmerel influenceofacousticstartleprobesonfearlearninginhumans |