Cargando…

Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified

Countermovement jump (CMJ) force-time testing is commonly used to monitor seasonal alterations in athletes’ CMJ strategy (to infer alterations in neuromuscular function). The flight time to contraction time (FT:CT) ratio and reactive strength index modified (RSI(mod)) are considered to be two primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMahon, John J., Lake, Jason P., Comfort, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6030081
_version_ 1783359129583091712
author McMahon, John J.
Lake, Jason P.
Comfort, Paul
author_facet McMahon, John J.
Lake, Jason P.
Comfort, Paul
author_sort McMahon, John J.
collection PubMed
description Countermovement jump (CMJ) force-time testing is commonly used to monitor seasonal alterations in athletes’ CMJ strategy (to infer alterations in neuromuscular function). The flight time to contraction time (FT:CT) ratio and reactive strength index modified (RSI(mod)) are considered to be two primary CMJ variables of interest. Due to similar calculations, it is likely that the FT:CT ratio and RSI(mod) share similar reliability and an almost perfect relationship. Consequently, there may be no requirement to include both variables in CMJ monitoring reports. This study aimed to investigate this by recruiting twenty-five males to perform three CMJs on a force platform across two sessions that were separated by one week. The FT:CT ratio and two calculations of RSI(mod) (based on the jump height from either flight time or take-off velocity) were then calculated using robust methods. The between-day reliability was good-excellent for all of the variables (95% confidence interval range of the coefficient of variation = 2.02–9.22%) with no significant between-day differences noted (p ≥ 0.231). There was an almost perfect positive relationship between the FT:CT ratio and RSI(mod) regardless of the calculation method (r = 0.944–0.947, p < 0.001). As the FT:CT ratio and RSI(mod) yield similar absolute reliability and share 90% of common variance, there is little reason to include both variables in CMJ monitoring reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6162366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61623662018-10-09 Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified McMahon, John J. Lake, Jason P. Comfort, Paul Sports (Basel) Article Countermovement jump (CMJ) force-time testing is commonly used to monitor seasonal alterations in athletes’ CMJ strategy (to infer alterations in neuromuscular function). The flight time to contraction time (FT:CT) ratio and reactive strength index modified (RSI(mod)) are considered to be two primary CMJ variables of interest. Due to similar calculations, it is likely that the FT:CT ratio and RSI(mod) share similar reliability and an almost perfect relationship. Consequently, there may be no requirement to include both variables in CMJ monitoring reports. This study aimed to investigate this by recruiting twenty-five males to perform three CMJs on a force platform across two sessions that were separated by one week. The FT:CT ratio and two calculations of RSI(mod) (based on the jump height from either flight time or take-off velocity) were then calculated using robust methods. The between-day reliability was good-excellent for all of the variables (95% confidence interval range of the coefficient of variation = 2.02–9.22%) with no significant between-day differences noted (p ≥ 0.231). There was an almost perfect positive relationship between the FT:CT ratio and RSI(mod) regardless of the calculation method (r = 0.944–0.947, p < 0.001). As the FT:CT ratio and RSI(mod) yield similar absolute reliability and share 90% of common variance, there is little reason to include both variables in CMJ monitoring reports. MDPI 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6162366/ /pubmed/30111715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6030081 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McMahon, John J.
Lake, Jason P.
Comfort, Paul
Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified
title Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified
title_full Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified
title_fullStr Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified
title_short Reliability of and Relationship between Flight Time to Contraction Time Ratio and Reactive Strength Index Modified
title_sort reliability of and relationship between flight time to contraction time ratio and reactive strength index modified
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6030081
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmahonjohnj reliabilityofandrelationshipbetweenflighttimetocontractiontimeratioandreactivestrengthindexmodified
AT lakejasonp reliabilityofandrelationshipbetweenflighttimetocontractiontimeratioandreactivestrengthindexmodified
AT comfortpaul reliabilityofandrelationshipbetweenflighttimetocontractiontimeratioandreactivestrengthindexmodified