Cargando…
The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnost...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043 |
_version_ | 1783359221117485056 |
---|---|
author | Schulz, Matthias C. Rittmann, Lena Range, Ursula Lauer, Günter Haim, Dominik |
author_facet | Schulz, Matthias C. Rittmann, Lena Range, Ursula Lauer, Günter Haim, Dominik |
author_sort | Schulz, Matthias C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnostiX(TM), orientation templates, including sleeves for the pilot-drill in regions 41 and 45, were manufactured by thermoforming. Sixty-one fifth year dental students inserted one implant using the orientation template and another implant free-hand in an artificial mandible. Information regarding age, sex, handedness, education, and the time required for implant insertion were recorded. Subsequently, the mandibles were scanned using cone-beam-computed tomography and the accuracy of the implant position was assessed, while statistical analysis followed. The free-hand implant insertion resulted in a distal deviation of −1.34 ± 5.15° and a mesial mismatch of 0.06 ± 0.79 mm at the artificial bone level compared to the sleeves. When using the orientation templates, the deviation decreased to −0.67 ± 3.48° and a distal mismatch of −0.22 ± 0.62 mm was achieved. The difference was statistically significant for the mismatch (p < 0.049). Regarding the limitations of our study, it could be said that the accuracy level achieved by dental undergraduates using implant placement with orientation templates is comparable to that in other studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6162789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61627892018-10-09 The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students Schulz, Matthias C. Rittmann, Lena Range, Ursula Lauer, Günter Haim, Dominik Dent J (Basel) Article Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnostiX(TM), orientation templates, including sleeves for the pilot-drill in regions 41 and 45, were manufactured by thermoforming. Sixty-one fifth year dental students inserted one implant using the orientation template and another implant free-hand in an artificial mandible. Information regarding age, sex, handedness, education, and the time required for implant insertion were recorded. Subsequently, the mandibles were scanned using cone-beam-computed tomography and the accuracy of the implant position was assessed, while statistical analysis followed. The free-hand implant insertion resulted in a distal deviation of −1.34 ± 5.15° and a mesial mismatch of 0.06 ± 0.79 mm at the artificial bone level compared to the sleeves. When using the orientation templates, the deviation decreased to −0.67 ± 3.48° and a distal mismatch of −0.22 ± 0.62 mm was achieved. The difference was statistically significant for the mismatch (p < 0.049). Regarding the limitations of our study, it could be said that the accuracy level achieved by dental undergraduates using implant placement with orientation templates is comparable to that in other studies. MDPI 2018-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6162789/ /pubmed/30200450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schulz, Matthias C. Rittmann, Lena Range, Ursula Lauer, Günter Haim, Dominik The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students |
title | The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students |
title_full | The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students |
title_fullStr | The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students |
title_short | The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students |
title_sort | use of orientation templates and free-hand implant insertion in artificial mandibles—an experimental laboratory examination in fifth-year dental students |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulzmatthiasc theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT rittmannlena theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT rangeursula theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT lauergunter theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT haimdominik theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT schulzmatthiasc useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT rittmannlena useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT rangeursula useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT lauergunter useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents AT haimdominik useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents |