Cargando…

The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students

Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulz, Matthias C., Rittmann, Lena, Range, Ursula, Lauer, Günter, Haim, Dominik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043
_version_ 1783359221117485056
author Schulz, Matthias C.
Rittmann, Lena
Range, Ursula
Lauer, Günter
Haim, Dominik
author_facet Schulz, Matthias C.
Rittmann, Lena
Range, Ursula
Lauer, Günter
Haim, Dominik
author_sort Schulz, Matthias C.
collection PubMed
description Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnostiX(TM), orientation templates, including sleeves for the pilot-drill in regions 41 and 45, were manufactured by thermoforming. Sixty-one fifth year dental students inserted one implant using the orientation template and another implant free-hand in an artificial mandible. Information regarding age, sex, handedness, education, and the time required for implant insertion were recorded. Subsequently, the mandibles were scanned using cone-beam-computed tomography and the accuracy of the implant position was assessed, while statistical analysis followed. The free-hand implant insertion resulted in a distal deviation of −1.34 ± 5.15° and a mesial mismatch of 0.06 ± 0.79 mm at the artificial bone level compared to the sleeves. When using the orientation templates, the deviation decreased to −0.67 ± 3.48° and a distal mismatch of −0.22 ± 0.62 mm was achieved. The difference was statistically significant for the mismatch (p < 0.049). Regarding the limitations of our study, it could be said that the accuracy level achieved by dental undergraduates using implant placement with orientation templates is comparable to that in other studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6162789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61627892018-10-09 The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students Schulz, Matthias C. Rittmann, Lena Range, Ursula Lauer, Günter Haim, Dominik Dent J (Basel) Article Implant dentistry is a growing field in the education of undergraduate dental students. The present laboratory study evaluates factors which may potentially influence the accuracy of free-hand implant insertion and the use of an orientation template. After three-dimensional planning using coDiagnostiX(TM), orientation templates, including sleeves for the pilot-drill in regions 41 and 45, were manufactured by thermoforming. Sixty-one fifth year dental students inserted one implant using the orientation template and another implant free-hand in an artificial mandible. Information regarding age, sex, handedness, education, and the time required for implant insertion were recorded. Subsequently, the mandibles were scanned using cone-beam-computed tomography and the accuracy of the implant position was assessed, while statistical analysis followed. The free-hand implant insertion resulted in a distal deviation of −1.34 ± 5.15° and a mesial mismatch of 0.06 ± 0.79 mm at the artificial bone level compared to the sleeves. When using the orientation templates, the deviation decreased to −0.67 ± 3.48° and a distal mismatch of −0.22 ± 0.62 mm was achieved. The difference was statistically significant for the mismatch (p < 0.049). Regarding the limitations of our study, it could be said that the accuracy level achieved by dental undergraduates using implant placement with orientation templates is comparable to that in other studies. MDPI 2018-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6162789/ /pubmed/30200450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schulz, Matthias C.
Rittmann, Lena
Range, Ursula
Lauer, Günter
Haim, Dominik
The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
title The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
title_full The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
title_fullStr The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
title_short The Use of Orientation Templates and Free-Hand Implant Insertion in Artificial Mandibles—An Experimental Laboratory Examination in Fifth-Year Dental Students
title_sort use of orientation templates and free-hand implant insertion in artificial mandibles—an experimental laboratory examination in fifth-year dental students
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj6030043
work_keys_str_mv AT schulzmatthiasc theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT rittmannlena theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT rangeursula theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT lauergunter theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT haimdominik theuseoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT schulzmatthiasc useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT rittmannlena useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT rangeursula useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT lauergunter useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents
AT haimdominik useoforientationtemplatesandfreehandimplantinsertioninartificialmandiblesanexperimentallaboratoryexaminationinfifthyeardentalstudents