Cargando…

Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)

The use of noninsulin antihyperglycaemic drugs in the hospital setting has not yet been fully described. This observational study compared the efficacy and safety of the standard basal-bolus insulin regimen versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) plus basal insulin in medicine depart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M., Gómez-Doblas, Juan J., Millán-Gómez, Mercedes, López-Carmona, María D., Guijarro-Merino, Ricardo, Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando, de Teresa-Galván, Eduardo, Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel, Bernal-López, M. Rosa, Gómez-Huelgas, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090271
_version_ 1783359227696250880
author Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M.
Gómez-Doblas, Juan J.
Millán-Gómez, Mercedes
López-Carmona, María D.
Guijarro-Merino, Ricardo
Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando
de Teresa-Galván, Eduardo
Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel
Bernal-López, M. Rosa
Gómez-Huelgas, Ricardo
author_facet Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M.
Gómez-Doblas, Juan J.
Millán-Gómez, Mercedes
López-Carmona, María D.
Guijarro-Merino, Ricardo
Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando
de Teresa-Galván, Eduardo
Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel
Bernal-López, M. Rosa
Gómez-Huelgas, Ricardo
author_sort Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M.
collection PubMed
description The use of noninsulin antihyperglycaemic drugs in the hospital setting has not yet been fully described. This observational study compared the efficacy and safety of the standard basal-bolus insulin regimen versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) plus basal insulin in medicine department inpatients in real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively enrolled non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia and no injectable treatments at home who were treated with a hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen (basal-bolus insulin, or linagliptin-basal insulin) between January 2016 and December 2017. Propensity score was used to match patients in both treatment groups and a comparative analysis was conducted to test the significance of differences between groups. After matched-pair analysis, 227 patients were included per group. No differences were shown between basal-bolus versus linagliptin-basal regimens for the mean daily blood glucose concentration after admission (standardized difference = 0.011), number of blood glucose readings between 100–140 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.017) and >200 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.021), or treatment failures (standardized difference = 0.011). Patients on basal-bolus insulin received higher total insulin doses and a higher daily number of injections (standardized differences = 0.298 and 0.301, respectively). Basal and supplemental rapid-acting insulin doses were similar (standardized differences = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). There were no differences in hospital stay length (standardized difference = 0.003), hypoglycaemic events (standardized difference = 0.018), or hospital complications (standardized difference = 0.010) between groups. This study shows that in real-world clinical practice, the linagliptin-basal insulin regimen was as effective and safe as the standard basal-bolus regimen in non-critical patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia treated at home without injectable therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6162816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61628162018-10-02 Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study) Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M. Gómez-Doblas, Juan J. Millán-Gómez, Mercedes López-Carmona, María D. Guijarro-Merino, Ricardo Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando de Teresa-Galván, Eduardo Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel Bernal-López, M. Rosa Gómez-Huelgas, Ricardo J Clin Med Article The use of noninsulin antihyperglycaemic drugs in the hospital setting has not yet been fully described. This observational study compared the efficacy and safety of the standard basal-bolus insulin regimen versus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (linagliptin) plus basal insulin in medicine department inpatients in real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively enrolled non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia and no injectable treatments at home who were treated with a hospital antihyperglycaemic regimen (basal-bolus insulin, or linagliptin-basal insulin) between January 2016 and December 2017. Propensity score was used to match patients in both treatment groups and a comparative analysis was conducted to test the significance of differences between groups. After matched-pair analysis, 227 patients were included per group. No differences were shown between basal-bolus versus linagliptin-basal regimens for the mean daily blood glucose concentration after admission (standardized difference = 0.011), number of blood glucose readings between 100–140 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.017) and >200 mg/dL (standardized difference = 0.021), or treatment failures (standardized difference = 0.011). Patients on basal-bolus insulin received higher total insulin doses and a higher daily number of injections (standardized differences = 0.298 and 0.301, respectively). Basal and supplemental rapid-acting insulin doses were similar (standardized differences = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). There were no differences in hospital stay length (standardized difference = 0.003), hypoglycaemic events (standardized difference = 0.018), or hospital complications (standardized difference = 0.010) between groups. This study shows that in real-world clinical practice, the linagliptin-basal insulin regimen was as effective and safe as the standard basal-bolus regimen in non-critical patients with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia treated at home without injectable therapies. MDPI 2018-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6162816/ /pubmed/30208631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090271 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pérez-Belmonte, Luis M.
Gómez-Doblas, Juan J.
Millán-Gómez, Mercedes
López-Carmona, María D.
Guijarro-Merino, Ricardo
Carrasco-Chinchilla, Fernando
de Teresa-Galván, Eduardo
Jiménez-Navarro, Manuel
Bernal-López, M. Rosa
Gómez-Huelgas, Ricardo
Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)
title Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)
title_full Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)
title_fullStr Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)
title_full_unstemmed Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)
title_short Use of Linagliptin for the Management of Medicine Department Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Clinical Practice (Lina-Real-World Study)
title_sort use of linagliptin for the management of medicine department inpatients with type 2 diabetes in real-world clinical practice (lina-real-world study)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30208631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090271
work_keys_str_mv AT perezbelmonteluism useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT gomezdoblasjuanj useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT millangomezmercedes useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT lopezcarmonamariad useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT guijarromerinoricardo useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT carrascochinchillafernando useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT deteresagalvaneduardo useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT jimeneznavarromanuel useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT bernallopezmrosa useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy
AT gomezhuelgasricardo useoflinagliptinforthemanagementofmedicinedepartmentinpatientswithtype2diabetesinrealworldclinicalpracticelinarealworldstudy