Cargando…

Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department

PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of death and disability in the United States. Many patients with TBI are initially treated in the emergency department (ED), but there is no evidence-based method of detecting or grading TBI in patients who have normal structural neuroimag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kruse, Adam J, Nugent, Andrew S, Peterson, Andrew R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30288131
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S165995
_version_ 1783359273699377152
author Kruse, Adam J
Nugent, Andrew S
Peterson, Andrew R
author_facet Kruse, Adam J
Nugent, Andrew S
Peterson, Andrew R
author_sort Kruse, Adam J
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of death and disability in the United States. Many patients with TBI are initially treated in the emergency department (ED), but there is no evidence-based method of detecting or grading TBI in patients who have normal structural neuroimaging. This study aims to evaluate the validity of two common sideline concussion tests. The Concussion Symptom Severity Score (CSSS) and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) tests are well-validated sideline tests for concussion, but have not been validated in the setting of non-sport-related concussion, in settings other than the sideline or athletic training room or in moderate or severe TBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-eight subjects who had sustained a TBI within the previous 72 hours and 53 healthy control subjects were enrolled. CSSS and mBESS were administered. Clinical outcomes were followed up prospectively. RESULTS: The CSSS was collected in 147 TBI subjects but only 51 TBI subjects were able to complete the mBESS. The CSSS was collected for all 53 control subjects, and the mBESS was completed for 51 control subjects. The mean CSSS for TBI and control subjects was 32.25 and 2.70, respectively (P < 0.001). The average mBESS for TBI and control subjects was 7.43 and 7.20, respectively (P = 0.82). CSSS greater than 5.17 was 93.43% sensitive and 69.84% specific for TBI. CONCLUSION: The mBESS is poorly tolerated and, among those who can complete the test, not sensitive to TBI in the ED. The CSSS is both sensitive to TBI and well tolerated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61630132018-10-04 Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department Kruse, Adam J Nugent, Andrew S Peterson, Andrew R Open Access Emerg Med Original Research PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of death and disability in the United States. Many patients with TBI are initially treated in the emergency department (ED), but there is no evidence-based method of detecting or grading TBI in patients who have normal structural neuroimaging. This study aims to evaluate the validity of two common sideline concussion tests. The Concussion Symptom Severity Score (CSSS) and modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) tests are well-validated sideline tests for concussion, but have not been validated in the setting of non-sport-related concussion, in settings other than the sideline or athletic training room or in moderate or severe TBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-eight subjects who had sustained a TBI within the previous 72 hours and 53 healthy control subjects were enrolled. CSSS and mBESS were administered. Clinical outcomes were followed up prospectively. RESULTS: The CSSS was collected in 147 TBI subjects but only 51 TBI subjects were able to complete the mBESS. The CSSS was collected for all 53 control subjects, and the mBESS was completed for 51 control subjects. The mean CSSS for TBI and control subjects was 32.25 and 2.70, respectively (P < 0.001). The average mBESS for TBI and control subjects was 7.43 and 7.20, respectively (P = 0.82). CSSS greater than 5.17 was 93.43% sensitive and 69.84% specific for TBI. CONCLUSION: The mBESS is poorly tolerated and, among those who can complete the test, not sensitive to TBI in the ED. The CSSS is both sensitive to TBI and well tolerated. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6163013/ /pubmed/30288131 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S165995 Text en © 2018 Kruse et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kruse, Adam J
Nugent, Andrew S
Peterson, Andrew R
Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
title Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
title_full Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
title_fullStr Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
title_short Using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
title_sort using sideline concussion tests in the emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30288131
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S165995
work_keys_str_mv AT kruseadamj usingsidelineconcussiontestsintheemergencydepartment
AT nugentandrews usingsidelineconcussiontestsintheemergencydepartment
AT petersonandrewr usingsidelineconcussiontestsintheemergencydepartment