Cargando…

Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature

The accidental ingestion of a foreign body (FB) is a relatively common condition. In the present study, we report a peculiar case of rectal perforation, the first to our knowledge, caused by the inadvertent ingestion of a blister pill pack. The aim of this report is to illustrate the difficulties of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fleres, Francesco, Ieni, Antonio, Saladino, Edoardo, Speciale, Giuseppe, Aspromonte, Michele, Cannaò, Antonio, Macrì, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283801
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i10.384
_version_ 1783359287669555200
author Fleres, Francesco
Ieni, Antonio
Saladino, Edoardo
Speciale, Giuseppe
Aspromonte, Michele
Cannaò, Antonio
Macrì, Antonio
author_facet Fleres, Francesco
Ieni, Antonio
Saladino, Edoardo
Speciale, Giuseppe
Aspromonte, Michele
Cannaò, Antonio
Macrì, Antonio
author_sort Fleres, Francesco
collection PubMed
description The accidental ingestion of a foreign body (FB) is a relatively common condition. In the present study, we report a peculiar case of rectal perforation, the first to our knowledge, caused by the inadvertent ingestion of a blister pill pack. The aim of this report is to illustrate the difficulties of the case from a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint as well as its unusual presentation. A 75-year-old woman, mentally impaired, arrived at our emergency department in critical condition. The computed tomography scan revealed a substantial abdominopelvic peritoneal effusion and free perigastric air. The patient was therefore submitted to an urgent exploratory laparotomy; a 2-cm long, full-thickness lesion was identified in the anterior distal part of the intraperitoneal rectum. Hence, we performed a Hartmann’s procedure. Because of her critical condition, the patient was eventually transferred to the Intensive Care Unit, where she died after 10 d, showing no surgical complication. The ingestion of FBs is usually treated with observation or endoscopic removal. Less than 1% of FBs are likely to cause an intestinal perforation. The intestinal perforation resulting from the unintentional ingestion of an FB is often a difficult challenge when it comes to treatment, due to its late diagnosis and the patients’ deteriorated clinical condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61631322018-10-03 Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature Fleres, Francesco Ieni, Antonio Saladino, Edoardo Speciale, Giuseppe Aspromonte, Michele Cannaò, Antonio Macrì, Antonio World J Clin Cases Case Report The accidental ingestion of a foreign body (FB) is a relatively common condition. In the present study, we report a peculiar case of rectal perforation, the first to our knowledge, caused by the inadvertent ingestion of a blister pill pack. The aim of this report is to illustrate the difficulties of the case from a diagnostic and therapeutic viewpoint as well as its unusual presentation. A 75-year-old woman, mentally impaired, arrived at our emergency department in critical condition. The computed tomography scan revealed a substantial abdominopelvic peritoneal effusion and free perigastric air. The patient was therefore submitted to an urgent exploratory laparotomy; a 2-cm long, full-thickness lesion was identified in the anterior distal part of the intraperitoneal rectum. Hence, we performed a Hartmann’s procedure. Because of her critical condition, the patient was eventually transferred to the Intensive Care Unit, where she died after 10 d, showing no surgical complication. The ingestion of FBs is usually treated with observation or endoscopic removal. Less than 1% of FBs are likely to cause an intestinal perforation. The intestinal perforation resulting from the unintentional ingestion of an FB is often a difficult challenge when it comes to treatment, due to its late diagnosis and the patients’ deteriorated clinical condition. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-09-26 2018-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6163132/ /pubmed/30283801 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i10.384 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Case Report
Fleres, Francesco
Ieni, Antonio
Saladino, Edoardo
Speciale, Giuseppe
Aspromonte, Michele
Cannaò, Antonio
Macrì, Antonio
Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature
title Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature
title_full Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature
title_fullStr Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature
title_full_unstemmed Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature
title_short Rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: A case report and review of literature
title_sort rectal perforation by inadvertent ingestion of a blister pack: a case report and review of literature
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30283801
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i10.384
work_keys_str_mv AT fleresfrancesco rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT ieniantonio rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT saladinoedoardo rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT specialegiuseppe rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT aspromontemichele rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT cannaoantonio rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature
AT macriantonio rectalperforationbyinadvertentingestionofablisterpackacasereportandreviewofliterature