Cargando…

Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption

In this study, highly-interconnected porous titanium implants were produced by powder sintering with different porous diameters and open interconnectivity. The actual foams were produced using high cost technologies: Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), and spark plasma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica, Rappe, Katrin S., Molmeneu, Meritxell, Mas-Moruno, Carles, Guillem-Marti, Jordi, Punset, Miquel, Caparros, Cristina, Calero, Jose, Franch, Jordi, Fernandez-Fairen, Mariano, Gil, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092574
_version_ 1783359340395102208
author Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica
Rappe, Katrin S.
Molmeneu, Meritxell
Mas-Moruno, Carles
Guillem-Marti, Jordi
Punset, Miquel
Caparros, Cristina
Calero, Jose
Franch, Jordi
Fernandez-Fairen, Mariano
Gil, Javier
author_facet Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica
Rappe, Katrin S.
Molmeneu, Meritxell
Mas-Moruno, Carles
Guillem-Marti, Jordi
Punset, Miquel
Caparros, Cristina
Calero, Jose
Franch, Jordi
Fernandez-Fairen, Mariano
Gil, Javier
author_sort Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica
collection PubMed
description In this study, highly-interconnected porous titanium implants were produced by powder sintering with different porous diameters and open interconnectivity. The actual foams were produced using high cost technologies: Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), and spark plasma sintering, and the porosity and/or interconnection was not optimized. The aim was to generate a bioactive surface on foams using two different strategies, based on inorganic thermo-chemical treatment and organic coating by peptide adsorption, to enhance osseointegration. Porosity was produced using NaCl as a space holder and polyethyleneglicol as a binder phase. Static and fatigue tests were performed in order to determine mechanical behaviors. Surface bioactivation was performed using a thermo-chemical treatment or by chemical adsorption with peptides. Osteoblast-like cells were cultured and cytotoxicity was measured. Bioactivated scaffolds and a control were implanted in the tibiae of rabbits. Histomorphometric evaluation was performed at 4 weeks after implantation. Interconnected porosity was 53% with an average diameter of 210 µm and an elastic modulus of around 1 GPa with good mechanical properties. The samples presented cell survival values close to 100% of viability. Newly formed bone was observed inside macropores, through interconnected porosity, and on the implant surface. Successful bone colonization of inner structure (40%) suggested good osteoconductive capability of the implant. Bioactivated foams showed better results than non-treated ones, suggesting both bioactivation strategies induce osteointegration capability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61633522018-10-10 Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica Rappe, Katrin S. Molmeneu, Meritxell Mas-Moruno, Carles Guillem-Marti, Jordi Punset, Miquel Caparros, Cristina Calero, Jose Franch, Jordi Fernandez-Fairen, Mariano Gil, Javier Int J Mol Sci Article In this study, highly-interconnected porous titanium implants were produced by powder sintering with different porous diameters and open interconnectivity. The actual foams were produced using high cost technologies: Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), and spark plasma sintering, and the porosity and/or interconnection was not optimized. The aim was to generate a bioactive surface on foams using two different strategies, based on inorganic thermo-chemical treatment and organic coating by peptide adsorption, to enhance osseointegration. Porosity was produced using NaCl as a space holder and polyethyleneglicol as a binder phase. Static and fatigue tests were performed in order to determine mechanical behaviors. Surface bioactivation was performed using a thermo-chemical treatment or by chemical adsorption with peptides. Osteoblast-like cells were cultured and cytotoxicity was measured. Bioactivated scaffolds and a control were implanted in the tibiae of rabbits. Histomorphometric evaluation was performed at 4 weeks after implantation. Interconnected porosity was 53% with an average diameter of 210 µm and an elastic modulus of around 1 GPa with good mechanical properties. The samples presented cell survival values close to 100% of viability. Newly formed bone was observed inside macropores, through interconnected porosity, and on the implant surface. Successful bone colonization of inner structure (40%) suggested good osteoconductive capability of the implant. Bioactivated foams showed better results than non-treated ones, suggesting both bioactivation strategies induce osteointegration capability. MDPI 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6163352/ /pubmed/30200178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092574 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica
Rappe, Katrin S.
Molmeneu, Meritxell
Mas-Moruno, Carles
Guillem-Marti, Jordi
Punset, Miquel
Caparros, Cristina
Calero, Jose
Franch, Jordi
Fernandez-Fairen, Mariano
Gil, Javier
Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption
title Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption
title_full Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption
title_fullStr Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption
title_full_unstemmed Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption
title_short Two Different Strategies to Enhance Osseointegration in Porous Titanium: Inorganic Thermo-Chemical Treatment Versus Organic Coating by Peptide Adsorption
title_sort two different strategies to enhance osseointegration in porous titanium: inorganic thermo-chemical treatment versus organic coating by peptide adsorption
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092574
work_keys_str_mv AT ortizhernandezmonica twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT rappekatrins twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT molmeneumeritxell twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT masmorunocarles twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT guillemmartijordi twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT punsetmiquel twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT caparroscristina twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT calerojose twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT franchjordi twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT fernandezfairenmariano twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption
AT giljavier twodifferentstrategiestoenhanceosseointegrationinporoustitaniuminorganicthermochemicaltreatmentversusorganiccoatingbypeptideadsorption