Cargando…
Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
Background: In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092001 |
_version_ | 1783359349643542528 |
---|---|
author | Alberto, Ranavolo Draicchio, Francesco Varrecchia, Tiwana Silvetti, Alessio Iavicoli, Sergio |
author_facet | Alberto, Ranavolo Draicchio, Francesco Varrecchia, Tiwana Silvetti, Alessio Iavicoli, Sergio |
author_sort | Alberto, Ranavolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quantitative instrumental-based biomechanical risk assessments in prevention of WMSDs. Methods: Articles written until 7 May 2018 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science using specific keywords. Results: Instrumental approaches based on inertial measurement units and sEMG sensors have been used for direct evaluations to classify lifting tasks into low and high risk categories. Wearable sensors have also been used for direct instrumental evaluations in handling of low loads at high frequency activities by using the local myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue estimation. In the field of the rating of standard methods, on-body wireless sensors network-based approaches for real-time ergonomic assessment in industrial manufacturing have been proposed. Conclusions: Few studies foresee the use of wearable technologies for biomechanical risk assessment although the requirement to obtain increasingly quantitative evaluations, the recent miniaturization process and the need to follow a constantly evolving manual handling scenario is prompting their use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6163390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61633902018-10-12 Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review Alberto, Ranavolo Draicchio, Francesco Varrecchia, Tiwana Silvetti, Alessio Iavicoli, Sergio Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quantitative instrumental-based biomechanical risk assessments in prevention of WMSDs. Methods: Articles written until 7 May 2018 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science using specific keywords. Results: Instrumental approaches based on inertial measurement units and sEMG sensors have been used for direct evaluations to classify lifting tasks into low and high risk categories. Wearable sensors have also been used for direct instrumental evaluations in handling of low loads at high frequency activities by using the local myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue estimation. In the field of the rating of standard methods, on-body wireless sensors network-based approaches for real-time ergonomic assessment in industrial manufacturing have been proposed. Conclusions: Few studies foresee the use of wearable technologies for biomechanical risk assessment although the requirement to obtain increasingly quantitative evaluations, the recent miniaturization process and the need to follow a constantly evolving manual handling scenario is prompting their use. MDPI 2018-09-13 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6163390/ /pubmed/30217079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092001 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Alberto, Ranavolo Draicchio, Francesco Varrecchia, Tiwana Silvetti, Alessio Iavicoli, Sergio Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review |
title | Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review |
title_full | Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review |
title_short | Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | wearable monitoring devices for biomechanical risk assessment at work: current status and future challenges—a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albertoranavolo wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview AT draicchiofrancesco wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview AT varrecchiatiwana wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview AT silvettialessio wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview AT iavicolisergio wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview |