Cargando…

Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review

Background: In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberto, Ranavolo, Draicchio, Francesco, Varrecchia, Tiwana, Silvetti, Alessio, Iavicoli, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092001
_version_ 1783359349643542528
author Alberto, Ranavolo
Draicchio, Francesco
Varrecchia, Tiwana
Silvetti, Alessio
Iavicoli, Sergio
author_facet Alberto, Ranavolo
Draicchio, Francesco
Varrecchia, Tiwana
Silvetti, Alessio
Iavicoli, Sergio
author_sort Alberto, Ranavolo
collection PubMed
description Background: In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quantitative instrumental-based biomechanical risk assessments in prevention of WMSDs. Methods: Articles written until 7 May 2018 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science using specific keywords. Results: Instrumental approaches based on inertial measurement units and sEMG sensors have been used for direct evaluations to classify lifting tasks into low and high risk categories. Wearable sensors have also been used for direct instrumental evaluations in handling of low loads at high frequency activities by using the local myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue estimation. In the field of the rating of standard methods, on-body wireless sensors network-based approaches for real-time ergonomic assessment in industrial manufacturing have been proposed. Conclusions: Few studies foresee the use of wearable technologies for biomechanical risk assessment although the requirement to obtain increasingly quantitative evaluations, the recent miniaturization process and the need to follow a constantly evolving manual handling scenario is prompting their use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61633902018-10-12 Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review Alberto, Ranavolo Draicchio, Francesco Varrecchia, Tiwana Silvetti, Alessio Iavicoli, Sergio Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: In order to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) several methods have been developed, accepted by the international literature and used in the workplace. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe recent implementations of wearable sensors for quantitative instrumental-based biomechanical risk assessments in prevention of WMSDs. Methods: Articles written until 7 May 2018 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science using specific keywords. Results: Instrumental approaches based on inertial measurement units and sEMG sensors have been used for direct evaluations to classify lifting tasks into low and high risk categories. Wearable sensors have also been used for direct instrumental evaluations in handling of low loads at high frequency activities by using the local myoelectric manifestation of muscle fatigue estimation. In the field of the rating of standard methods, on-body wireless sensors network-based approaches for real-time ergonomic assessment in industrial manufacturing have been proposed. Conclusions: Few studies foresee the use of wearable technologies for biomechanical risk assessment although the requirement to obtain increasingly quantitative evaluations, the recent miniaturization process and the need to follow a constantly evolving manual handling scenario is prompting their use. MDPI 2018-09-13 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6163390/ /pubmed/30217079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092001 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Alberto, Ranavolo
Draicchio, Francesco
Varrecchia, Tiwana
Silvetti, Alessio
Iavicoli, Sergio
Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
title Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
title_full Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
title_short Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges—A Systematic Review
title_sort wearable monitoring devices for biomechanical risk assessment at work: current status and future challenges—a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30217079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092001
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoranavolo wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview
AT draicchiofrancesco wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview
AT varrecchiatiwana wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview
AT silvettialessio wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview
AT iavicolisergio wearablemonitoringdevicesforbiomechanicalriskassessmentatworkcurrentstatusandfuturechallengesasystematicreview