Cargando…
Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors
A low-cost air quality station has been developed for real-time monitoring of main atmospheric pollutants. Sensors for CO, CO(2), NO(2), O(3), VOC, PM(2.5) and PM(10) were integrated on an Arduino Shield compatible board. As concerns PM(2.5) and PM(10) sensors, the station underwent a laboratory cal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18092843 |
_version_ | 1783359367955873792 |
---|---|
author | Cavaliere, Alice Carotenuto, Federico Di Gennaro, Filippo Gioli, Beniamino Gualtieri, Giovanni Martelli, Francesca Matese, Alessandro Toscano, Piero Vagnoli, Carolina Zaldei, Alessandro |
author_facet | Cavaliere, Alice Carotenuto, Federico Di Gennaro, Filippo Gioli, Beniamino Gualtieri, Giovanni Martelli, Francesca Matese, Alessandro Toscano, Piero Vagnoli, Carolina Zaldei, Alessandro |
author_sort | Cavaliere, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | A low-cost air quality station has been developed for real-time monitoring of main atmospheric pollutants. Sensors for CO, CO(2), NO(2), O(3), VOC, PM(2.5) and PM(10) were integrated on an Arduino Shield compatible board. As concerns PM(2.5) and PM(10) sensors, the station underwent a laboratory calibration and later a field validation. Laboratory calibration has been carried out at the headquarters of CNR-IBIMET in Florence (Italy) against a TSI DustTrak reference instrument. A MATLAB procedure, implementing advanced mathematical techniques to detect possible complex non-linear relationships between sensor signals and reference data, has been developed and implemented to accomplish the laboratory calibration. Field validation has been performed across a full “heating season” (1 November 2016 to 15 April 2017) by co-locating the station at a road site in Florence where an official fixed air quality station was in operation. Both calibration and validation processes returned fine scores, in most cases better than those achieved for similar systems in the literature. During field validation, in particular, for PM(2.5) and PM(10) mean biases of 0.036 and 0.598 µg/m(3), RMSE of 4.056 and 6.084 µg/m(3), and R(2) of 0.909 and 0.957 were achieved, respectively. Robustness of the developed station, seamless deployed through a five and a half month outdoor campaign without registering sensor failures or drifts, is a further key point. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6163466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61634662018-10-10 Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors Cavaliere, Alice Carotenuto, Federico Di Gennaro, Filippo Gioli, Beniamino Gualtieri, Giovanni Martelli, Francesca Matese, Alessandro Toscano, Piero Vagnoli, Carolina Zaldei, Alessandro Sensors (Basel) Article A low-cost air quality station has been developed for real-time monitoring of main atmospheric pollutants. Sensors for CO, CO(2), NO(2), O(3), VOC, PM(2.5) and PM(10) were integrated on an Arduino Shield compatible board. As concerns PM(2.5) and PM(10) sensors, the station underwent a laboratory calibration and later a field validation. Laboratory calibration has been carried out at the headquarters of CNR-IBIMET in Florence (Italy) against a TSI DustTrak reference instrument. A MATLAB procedure, implementing advanced mathematical techniques to detect possible complex non-linear relationships between sensor signals and reference data, has been developed and implemented to accomplish the laboratory calibration. Field validation has been performed across a full “heating season” (1 November 2016 to 15 April 2017) by co-locating the station at a road site in Florence where an official fixed air quality station was in operation. Both calibration and validation processes returned fine scores, in most cases better than those achieved for similar systems in the literature. During field validation, in particular, for PM(2.5) and PM(10) mean biases of 0.036 and 0.598 µg/m(3), RMSE of 4.056 and 6.084 µg/m(3), and R(2) of 0.909 and 0.957 were achieved, respectively. Robustness of the developed station, seamless deployed through a five and a half month outdoor campaign without registering sensor failures or drifts, is a further key point. MDPI 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6163466/ /pubmed/30154366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18092843 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cavaliere, Alice Carotenuto, Federico Di Gennaro, Filippo Gioli, Beniamino Gualtieri, Giovanni Martelli, Francesca Matese, Alessandro Toscano, Piero Vagnoli, Carolina Zaldei, Alessandro Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors |
title | Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors |
title_full | Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors |
title_fullStr | Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors |
title_short | Development of Low-Cost Air Quality Stations for Next Generation Monitoring Networks: Calibration and Validation of PM(2.5) and PM(10) Sensors |
title_sort | development of low-cost air quality stations for next generation monitoring networks: calibration and validation of pm(2.5) and pm(10) sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30154366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18092843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cavalierealice developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT carotenutofederico developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT digennarofilippo developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT giolibeniamino developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT gualtierigiovanni developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT martellifrancesca developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT matesealessandro developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT toscanopiero developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT vagnolicarolina developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors AT zaldeialessandro developmentoflowcostairqualitystationsfornextgenerationmonitoringnetworkscalibrationandvalidationofpm25andpm10sensors |