Cargando…

How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified

Two broad features are jointly necessary for autonomous agency: organisational closure and the embodiment of an objective-function providing a ‘goal’: so far only organisms demonstrate both. Organisational closure has been studied (mostly in abstract), especially as cell autopoiesis and the cybernet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Farnsworth, Keith Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29966241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology7030038
_version_ 1783359481012289536
author Farnsworth, Keith Douglas
author_facet Farnsworth, Keith Douglas
author_sort Farnsworth, Keith Douglas
collection PubMed
description Two broad features are jointly necessary for autonomous agency: organisational closure and the embodiment of an objective-function providing a ‘goal’: so far only organisms demonstrate both. Organisational closure has been studied (mostly in abstract), especially as cell autopoiesis and the cybernetic principles of autonomy, but the role of an internalised ‘goal’ and how it is instantiated by cell signalling and the functioning of nervous systems has received less attention. Here I add some biological ‘flesh’ to the cybernetic theory and trace the evolutionary development of step-changes in autonomy: (1) homeostasis of organisationally closed systems; (2) perception-action systems; (3) action selection systems; (4) cognitive systems; (5) memory supporting a self-model able to anticipate and evaluate actions and consequences. Each stage is characterised by the number of nested goal-directed control-loops embodied by the organism, summarised as will-nestedness [Formula: see text]. Organism tegument, receptor/transducer system, mechanisms of cellular and whole-organism re-programming and organisational integration, all contribute to causal independence. Conclusion: organisms are cybernetic phenomena whose identity is created by the information structure of the highest level of causal closure (maximum [Formula: see text]), which has increased through evolution, leading to increased causal independence, which might be quantifiable by ‘Integrated Information Theory’ measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61639372018-10-10 How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified Farnsworth, Keith Douglas Biology (Basel) Concept Paper Two broad features are jointly necessary for autonomous agency: organisational closure and the embodiment of an objective-function providing a ‘goal’: so far only organisms demonstrate both. Organisational closure has been studied (mostly in abstract), especially as cell autopoiesis and the cybernetic principles of autonomy, but the role of an internalised ‘goal’ and how it is instantiated by cell signalling and the functioning of nervous systems has received less attention. Here I add some biological ‘flesh’ to the cybernetic theory and trace the evolutionary development of step-changes in autonomy: (1) homeostasis of organisationally closed systems; (2) perception-action systems; (3) action selection systems; (4) cognitive systems; (5) memory supporting a self-model able to anticipate and evaluate actions and consequences. Each stage is characterised by the number of nested goal-directed control-loops embodied by the organism, summarised as will-nestedness [Formula: see text]. Organism tegument, receptor/transducer system, mechanisms of cellular and whole-organism re-programming and organisational integration, all contribute to causal independence. Conclusion: organisms are cybernetic phenomena whose identity is created by the information structure of the highest level of causal closure (maximum [Formula: see text]), which has increased through evolution, leading to increased causal independence, which might be quantifiable by ‘Integrated Information Theory’ measures. MDPI 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6163937/ /pubmed/29966241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology7030038 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Concept Paper
Farnsworth, Keith Douglas
How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
title How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
title_full How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
title_fullStr How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
title_full_unstemmed How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
title_short How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
title_sort how organisms gained causal independence and how it might be quantified
topic Concept Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29966241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology7030038
work_keys_str_mv AT farnsworthkeithdouglas howorganismsgainedcausalindependenceandhowitmightbequantified