Cargando…
How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified
Two broad features are jointly necessary for autonomous agency: organisational closure and the embodiment of an objective-function providing a ‘goal’: so far only organisms demonstrate both. Organisational closure has been studied (mostly in abstract), especially as cell autopoiesis and the cybernet...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29966241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology7030038 |
_version_ | 1783359481012289536 |
---|---|
author | Farnsworth, Keith Douglas |
author_facet | Farnsworth, Keith Douglas |
author_sort | Farnsworth, Keith Douglas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two broad features are jointly necessary for autonomous agency: organisational closure and the embodiment of an objective-function providing a ‘goal’: so far only organisms demonstrate both. Organisational closure has been studied (mostly in abstract), especially as cell autopoiesis and the cybernetic principles of autonomy, but the role of an internalised ‘goal’ and how it is instantiated by cell signalling and the functioning of nervous systems has received less attention. Here I add some biological ‘flesh’ to the cybernetic theory and trace the evolutionary development of step-changes in autonomy: (1) homeostasis of organisationally closed systems; (2) perception-action systems; (3) action selection systems; (4) cognitive systems; (5) memory supporting a self-model able to anticipate and evaluate actions and consequences. Each stage is characterised by the number of nested goal-directed control-loops embodied by the organism, summarised as will-nestedness [Formula: see text]. Organism tegument, receptor/transducer system, mechanisms of cellular and whole-organism re-programming and organisational integration, all contribute to causal independence. Conclusion: organisms are cybernetic phenomena whose identity is created by the information structure of the highest level of causal closure (maximum [Formula: see text]), which has increased through evolution, leading to increased causal independence, which might be quantifiable by ‘Integrated Information Theory’ measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6163937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61639372018-10-10 How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified Farnsworth, Keith Douglas Biology (Basel) Concept Paper Two broad features are jointly necessary for autonomous agency: organisational closure and the embodiment of an objective-function providing a ‘goal’: so far only organisms demonstrate both. Organisational closure has been studied (mostly in abstract), especially as cell autopoiesis and the cybernetic principles of autonomy, but the role of an internalised ‘goal’ and how it is instantiated by cell signalling and the functioning of nervous systems has received less attention. Here I add some biological ‘flesh’ to the cybernetic theory and trace the evolutionary development of step-changes in autonomy: (1) homeostasis of organisationally closed systems; (2) perception-action systems; (3) action selection systems; (4) cognitive systems; (5) memory supporting a self-model able to anticipate and evaluate actions and consequences. Each stage is characterised by the number of nested goal-directed control-loops embodied by the organism, summarised as will-nestedness [Formula: see text]. Organism tegument, receptor/transducer system, mechanisms of cellular and whole-organism re-programming and organisational integration, all contribute to causal independence. Conclusion: organisms are cybernetic phenomena whose identity is created by the information structure of the highest level of causal closure (maximum [Formula: see text]), which has increased through evolution, leading to increased causal independence, which might be quantifiable by ‘Integrated Information Theory’ measures. MDPI 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6163937/ /pubmed/29966241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology7030038 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Concept Paper Farnsworth, Keith Douglas How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified |
title | How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified |
title_full | How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified |
title_fullStr | How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified |
title_full_unstemmed | How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified |
title_short | How Organisms Gained Causal Independence and How It Might Be Quantified |
title_sort | how organisms gained causal independence and how it might be quantified |
topic | Concept Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29966241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology7030038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farnsworthkeithdouglas howorganismsgainedcausalindependenceandhowitmightbequantified |