Cargando…

Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold

The aim of this study was to manufacture and evaluate the effect of a biphasic calcium silicophosphate (CSP) scaffold ceramic, coated with a natural demineralized bone matrix (DBM), to evaluate the efficiency of this novel ceramic material in bone regeneration. The DBM-coated CSP ceramic was made by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parrilla-Almansa, Andrés, García-Carrillo, Nuria, Ros-Tárraga, Patricia, Martínez, Carlos M., Martínez-Martínez, Francisco, Meseguer-Olmo, Luis, De Aza, Piedad N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11091580
_version_ 1783359493854199808
author Parrilla-Almansa, Andrés
García-Carrillo, Nuria
Ros-Tárraga, Patricia
Martínez, Carlos M.
Martínez-Martínez, Francisco
Meseguer-Olmo, Luis
De Aza, Piedad N.
author_facet Parrilla-Almansa, Andrés
García-Carrillo, Nuria
Ros-Tárraga, Patricia
Martínez, Carlos M.
Martínez-Martínez, Francisco
Meseguer-Olmo, Luis
De Aza, Piedad N.
author_sort Parrilla-Almansa, Andrés
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to manufacture and evaluate the effect of a biphasic calcium silicophosphate (CSP) scaffold ceramic, coated with a natural demineralized bone matrix (DBM), to evaluate the efficiency of this novel ceramic material in bone regeneration. The DBM-coated CSP ceramic was made by coating a CSP scaffold with gel DBM, produced by the partial sintering of different-sized porous granules. These scaffolds were used to reconstruct defects in rabbit tibiae, where CSP scaffolds acted as the control material. Micro-CT and histological analyses were performed to evaluate new bone formation at 1, 3, and 5 months post-surgery. The present research results showed a correlation among the data obtained by micro-CT and the histomorphological results, the gradual disintegration of the biomaterial, and the presence of free scaffold fragments dispersed inside the medullary cavity occupied by hematopoietic bone marrow over the 5-month study period. No difference was found between the DBM-coated and uncoated implants. The new bone tissue inside the implants increased with implantation time. Slightly less new bone formation was observed in the DBM-coated samples, but it was not statistically significant. Both the DBM-coated and the CSP scaffolds gave excellent bone tissue responses and good osteoconductivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6163991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61639912018-10-12 Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold Parrilla-Almansa, Andrés García-Carrillo, Nuria Ros-Tárraga, Patricia Martínez, Carlos M. Martínez-Martínez, Francisco Meseguer-Olmo, Luis De Aza, Piedad N. Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to manufacture and evaluate the effect of a biphasic calcium silicophosphate (CSP) scaffold ceramic, coated with a natural demineralized bone matrix (DBM), to evaluate the efficiency of this novel ceramic material in bone regeneration. The DBM-coated CSP ceramic was made by coating a CSP scaffold with gel DBM, produced by the partial sintering of different-sized porous granules. These scaffolds were used to reconstruct defects in rabbit tibiae, where CSP scaffolds acted as the control material. Micro-CT and histological analyses were performed to evaluate new bone formation at 1, 3, and 5 months post-surgery. The present research results showed a correlation among the data obtained by micro-CT and the histomorphological results, the gradual disintegration of the biomaterial, and the presence of free scaffold fragments dispersed inside the medullary cavity occupied by hematopoietic bone marrow over the 5-month study period. No difference was found between the DBM-coated and uncoated implants. The new bone tissue inside the implants increased with implantation time. Slightly less new bone formation was observed in the DBM-coated samples, but it was not statistically significant. Both the DBM-coated and the CSP scaffolds gave excellent bone tissue responses and good osteoconductivity. MDPI 2018-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6163991/ /pubmed/30200440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11091580 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Parrilla-Almansa, Andrés
García-Carrillo, Nuria
Ros-Tárraga, Patricia
Martínez, Carlos M.
Martínez-Martínez, Francisco
Meseguer-Olmo, Luis
De Aza, Piedad N.
Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold
title Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold
title_full Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold
title_fullStr Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold
title_full_unstemmed Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold
title_short Demineralized Bone Matrix Coating Si-Ca-P Ceramic Does Not Improve the Osseointegration of the Scaffold
title_sort demineralized bone matrix coating si-ca-p ceramic does not improve the osseointegration of the scaffold
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6163991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30200440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11091580
work_keys_str_mv AT parrillaalmansaandres demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold
AT garciacarrillonuria demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold
AT rostarragapatricia demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold
AT martinezcarlosm demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold
AT martinezmartinezfrancisco demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold
AT meseguerolmoluis demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold
AT deazapiedadn demineralizedbonematrixcoatingsicapceramicdoesnotimprovetheosseointegrationofthescaffold