Cargando…

Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) has been used for identification of possible biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, in different studies inconsistent results have been obtained. We wanted to analyze the diagnostic value of 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Auer, Michael, Hegen, Harald, Rudzki, Dagmar, Golderer, Georg, Deisenhammer, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6164878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8030044
_version_ 1783359704947228672
author Auer, Michael
Hegen, Harald
Rudzki, Dagmar
Golderer, Georg
Deisenhammer, Florian
author_facet Auer, Michael
Hegen, Harald
Rudzki, Dagmar
Golderer, Georg
Deisenhammer, Florian
author_sort Auer, Michael
collection PubMed
description Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) has been used for identification of possible biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, in different studies inconsistent results have been obtained. We wanted to analyze the diagnostic value of 2D-DIGE in early MS patients by comparing protein patterns between single and pooled samples of MS patients and controls. CSF samples of 20 MS patients and 10 control subjects were processed with 2D-DIGE. The so obtained protein patterns were analyzed with DeCyder 6.5 software, whereby we described variation of patterns presented in one gel as well as between different gels. Even when running single samples of patients of the same group in one gel, variation of protein patterns was high. The number of identified spots with different protein level varied between 4 and 30, depending on which sample batches were compared. We did not find a consistent pattern throughout all possible batch combinations. The inter-individual variation of protein expression as well as the susceptibility of 2D-DIGE for methodological variations makes use of 2D-DIGE as a diagnostic tool for MS and for detection of possible candidate biomarkers difficult, since detected proteins vary depending on which samples are compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6164878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61648782018-10-11 Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Auer, Michael Hegen, Harald Rudzki, Dagmar Golderer, Georg Deisenhammer, Florian Diagnostics (Basel) Article Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) has been used for identification of possible biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. However, in different studies inconsistent results have been obtained. We wanted to analyze the diagnostic value of 2D-DIGE in early MS patients by comparing protein patterns between single and pooled samples of MS patients and controls. CSF samples of 20 MS patients and 10 control subjects were processed with 2D-DIGE. The so obtained protein patterns were analyzed with DeCyder 6.5 software, whereby we described variation of patterns presented in one gel as well as between different gels. Even when running single samples of patients of the same group in one gel, variation of protein patterns was high. The number of identified spots with different protein level varied between 4 and 30, depending on which sample batches were compared. We did not find a consistent pattern throughout all possible batch combinations. The inter-individual variation of protein expression as well as the susceptibility of 2D-DIGE for methodological variations makes use of 2D-DIGE as a diagnostic tool for MS and for detection of possible candidate biomarkers difficult, since detected proteins vary depending on which samples are compared. MDPI 2018-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6164878/ /pubmed/29976874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8030044 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Auer, Michael
Hegen, Harald
Rudzki, Dagmar
Golderer, Georg
Deisenhammer, Florian
Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
title Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Utility of Two-Dimensional Difference Gel Electrophoresis in Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort utility of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6164878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29976874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics8030044
work_keys_str_mv AT auermichael utilityoftwodimensionaldifferencegelelectrophoresisindiagnosisofmultiplesclerosis
AT hegenharald utilityoftwodimensionaldifferencegelelectrophoresisindiagnosisofmultiplesclerosis
AT rudzkidagmar utilityoftwodimensionaldifferencegelelectrophoresisindiagnosisofmultiplesclerosis
AT golderergeorg utilityoftwodimensionaldifferencegelelectrophoresisindiagnosisofmultiplesclerosis
AT deisenhammerflorian utilityoftwodimensionaldifferencegelelectrophoresisindiagnosisofmultiplesclerosis