Cargando…
An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans
In 2014, a whistleblower reported that many U.S. veterans died while waiting for care at the Phoenix VHA. Problems with veteran’s care through 2018 reveal ongoing and systematic problem. In March 2018, the VA Inspector General identified critical deficiencies at the Washington, DC VA Medical Center...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030092 |
_version_ | 1783359771823308800 |
---|---|
author | Fulton, Lawrence V. Brooks, Matthew S. |
author_facet | Fulton, Lawrence V. Brooks, Matthew S. |
author_sort | Fulton, Lawrence V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2014, a whistleblower reported that many U.S. veterans died while waiting for care at the Phoenix VHA. Problems with veteran’s care through 2018 reveal ongoing and systematic problem. In March 2018, the VA Inspector General identified critical deficiencies at the Washington, DC VA Medical Center including failures to track patient safety events accurately, ineffective sterile processing and more than 10 thousand open or pending prosthetic/sensory aid consults. The VHA clearly has problems with access and quality in a budget-constrained environment. In this policy analysis, four separate interventions that address the gap between the magnitude as well as the use of the VHA’s fixed budget versus access and cost expectations are explored. These policy interventions include maintaining the status quo, returning to a “VHA-only” option, transitioning to a CMS central payer system and consolidating care under the DoD TRICARE insurance plans. An objective evaluation suggests that extending TRICARE to veterans during the phasing out the VHA’s care responsibilities, while politically unpalatable, would likely provide the best of four possible solutions under various criterion weighting schemes. A central payer solution under the CMS would also be a viable consideration. Results suggest that TRICARE patient perceptions of quality are superior to VHA and non-VHA/non-DoD, that access provided by the TRICARE program is ranked second in terms of venue acceptance only to the CMS solution set based on primary provider acceptance and that the cost per beneficiary of a TRICARE solution ($6.5 K/beneficiary) is far better than a VHA-only solution ($14.0 K/beneficiary), the CMS central payer solution ($12.2 K/beneficiary), or the status quo (between $12.2 K and $14.0 K/beneficiary). The intent of this paper is to provoke thoughtful consideration of solutions for providing access to high-quality healthcare for veterans within or outside of the VHA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6165162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61651622018-10-10 An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans Fulton, Lawrence V. Brooks, Matthew S. Healthcare (Basel) Article In 2014, a whistleblower reported that many U.S. veterans died while waiting for care at the Phoenix VHA. Problems with veteran’s care through 2018 reveal ongoing and systematic problem. In March 2018, the VA Inspector General identified critical deficiencies at the Washington, DC VA Medical Center including failures to track patient safety events accurately, ineffective sterile processing and more than 10 thousand open or pending prosthetic/sensory aid consults. The VHA clearly has problems with access and quality in a budget-constrained environment. In this policy analysis, four separate interventions that address the gap between the magnitude as well as the use of the VHA’s fixed budget versus access and cost expectations are explored. These policy interventions include maintaining the status quo, returning to a “VHA-only” option, transitioning to a CMS central payer system and consolidating care under the DoD TRICARE insurance plans. An objective evaluation suggests that extending TRICARE to veterans during the phasing out the VHA’s care responsibilities, while politically unpalatable, would likely provide the best of four possible solutions under various criterion weighting schemes. A central payer solution under the CMS would also be a viable consideration. Results suggest that TRICARE patient perceptions of quality are superior to VHA and non-VHA/non-DoD, that access provided by the TRICARE program is ranked second in terms of venue acceptance only to the CMS solution set based on primary provider acceptance and that the cost per beneficiary of a TRICARE solution ($6.5 K/beneficiary) is far better than a VHA-only solution ($14.0 K/beneficiary), the CMS central payer solution ($12.2 K/beneficiary), or the status quo (between $12.2 K and $14.0 K/beneficiary). The intent of this paper is to provoke thoughtful consideration of solutions for providing access to high-quality healthcare for veterans within or outside of the VHA. MDPI 2018-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6165162/ /pubmed/30072646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030092 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fulton, Lawrence V. Brooks, Matthew S. An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans |
title | An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans |
title_full | An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans |
title_short | An Evaluation of Alternatives for Providing Care to Veterans |
title_sort | evaluation of alternatives for providing care to veterans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fultonlawrencev anevaluationofalternativesforprovidingcaretoveterans AT brooksmatthews anevaluationofalternativesforprovidingcaretoveterans AT fultonlawrencev evaluationofalternativesforprovidingcaretoveterans AT brooksmatthews evaluationofalternativesforprovidingcaretoveterans |