Cargando…

Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials

AIM: To assess lower extremity decompression nerve surgery (DNS) to treat the consequences of diabetic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (DPN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, and related registries were searched through December 2017 to identify randomized, quasi-randomized or ob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albers, James W, Jacobson, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S146121
_version_ 1783359896018747392
author Albers, James W
Jacobson, Ryan
author_facet Albers, James W
Jacobson, Ryan
author_sort Albers, James W
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess lower extremity decompression nerve surgery (DNS) to treat the consequences of diabetic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (DPN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, and related registries were searched through December 2017 to identify randomized, quasi-randomized or observational trials that evaluated the efficacy of lower extremity DNS on pain relief (primary outcome) or other secondary outcomes. Observational studies were included, given investigators’ reluctance to use sham surgery controls. Outcome effect size was estimated, and a weighted average was calculated. RESULTS: Eight of 23 studies evaluated pain relief, including a double-blind randomized controlled trial (with a sham surgery leg), an unblinded trial with a nonsurgical control leg, and 6 observational studies. All reported substantial pain relief post-DNS with average effect sizes between two and five. Unexpectedly, the double-blind trial showed improvement in the sham leg comparable to the DNS leg and exceeding the improvement observed in the nonsurgical leg in the unblinded study. Sensory testing showed generally favorable results supporting DNS, and nerve conduction velocities increased post-DNS relative to deterioration in controls. Ultrasound revealed fusiform nerve swelling near compression sites. Morphological results of DNS were generally favorable but inconsistent, whereas hemodynamic measures showed a positive effect on arterial parameters, as did transcutaneous oximetry (improved microcirculation). The incidence of initial and recurrent neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers appeared reduced post-DNS relative to the contralateral foot (borderline significant). CONCLUSION: The data remain insufficient to recommend DNS for painful DPN, given conflicting and unexpectedly positive results involving sham surgery relative to unblinded controls. The generally supportive sensory and nerve conduction results are compromised by methodological issues, whereas more favorable results support DNS to prevent new or recurrent neuropathic foot ulcers. Future studies need to clarify subject selection vis-à-vis DPN vs superimposed compressed nerves, utilize appropriate validated instruments, and readdress use of sham surgical controls in light of recent results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6165741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61657412018-10-11 Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials Albers, James W Jacobson, Ryan Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Review AIM: To assess lower extremity decompression nerve surgery (DNS) to treat the consequences of diabetic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (DPN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, and related registries were searched through December 2017 to identify randomized, quasi-randomized or observational trials that evaluated the efficacy of lower extremity DNS on pain relief (primary outcome) or other secondary outcomes. Observational studies were included, given investigators’ reluctance to use sham surgery controls. Outcome effect size was estimated, and a weighted average was calculated. RESULTS: Eight of 23 studies evaluated pain relief, including a double-blind randomized controlled trial (with a sham surgery leg), an unblinded trial with a nonsurgical control leg, and 6 observational studies. All reported substantial pain relief post-DNS with average effect sizes between two and five. Unexpectedly, the double-blind trial showed improvement in the sham leg comparable to the DNS leg and exceeding the improvement observed in the nonsurgical leg in the unblinded study. Sensory testing showed generally favorable results supporting DNS, and nerve conduction velocities increased post-DNS relative to deterioration in controls. Ultrasound revealed fusiform nerve swelling near compression sites. Morphological results of DNS were generally favorable but inconsistent, whereas hemodynamic measures showed a positive effect on arterial parameters, as did transcutaneous oximetry (improved microcirculation). The incidence of initial and recurrent neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers appeared reduced post-DNS relative to the contralateral foot (borderline significant). CONCLUSION: The data remain insufficient to recommend DNS for painful DPN, given conflicting and unexpectedly positive results involving sham surgery relative to unblinded controls. The generally supportive sensory and nerve conduction results are compromised by methodological issues, whereas more favorable results support DNS to prevent new or recurrent neuropathic foot ulcers. Future studies need to clarify subject selection vis-à-vis DPN vs superimposed compressed nerves, utilize appropriate validated instruments, and readdress use of sham surgical controls in light of recent results. Dove Medical Press 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6165741/ /pubmed/30310297 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S146121 Text en © 2018 Albers and Jacobson. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Albers, James W
Jacobson, Ryan
Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
title Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
title_full Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
title_fullStr Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
title_short Decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
title_sort decompression nerve surgery for diabetic neuropathy: a structured review of published clinical trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30310297
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S146121
work_keys_str_mv AT albersjamesw decompressionnervesurgeryfordiabeticneuropathyastructuredreviewofpublishedclinicaltrials
AT jacobsonryan decompressionnervesurgeryfordiabeticneuropathyastructuredreviewofpublishedclinicaltrials