Cargando…
Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images
The segmentation of organs at risk is a crucial and time-consuming step in radiotherapy planning. Good automatic methods can significantly reduce the time clinicians have to spend on this task. Due to its variability in shape and low contrast to surrounding structures, segmenting the parotid gland i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.011005 |
_version_ | 1783359931472150528 |
---|---|
author | Hänsch, Annika Schwier, Michael Gass, Tobias Morgas, Tomasz Haas, Benjamin Dicken, Volker Meine, Hans Klein, Jan Hahn, Horst K. |
author_facet | Hänsch, Annika Schwier, Michael Gass, Tobias Morgas, Tomasz Haas, Benjamin Dicken, Volker Meine, Hans Klein, Jan Hahn, Horst K. |
author_sort | Hänsch, Annika |
collection | PubMed |
description | The segmentation of organs at risk is a crucial and time-consuming step in radiotherapy planning. Good automatic methods can significantly reduce the time clinicians have to spend on this task. Due to its variability in shape and low contrast to surrounding structures, segmenting the parotid gland is challenging. Motivated by the recent success of deep learning, we study the use of two-dimensional (2-D), 2-D ensemble, and three-dimensional (3-D) U-Nets for segmentation. The mean Dice similarity to ground truth is [Formula: see text] for all three models. A patch-based approach for class balancing seems promising for false-positive reduction. The 2-D ensemble and 3-D U-Net are applied to the test data of the 2015 MICCAI challenge on head and neck autosegmentation. Both deep learning methods generalize well onto independent data (Dice 0.865 and 0.88) and are superior to a selection of model- and atlas-based methods with respect to the Dice coefficient. Since appropriate reference annotations are essential for training but often difficult and expensive to obtain, it is important to know how many samples are needed for training. We evaluate the performance after training with different-sized training sets and observe no significant increase in the Dice coefficient for more than 250 training cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6165912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61659122019-10-01 Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images Hänsch, Annika Schwier, Michael Gass, Tobias Morgas, Tomasz Haas, Benjamin Dicken, Volker Meine, Hans Klein, Jan Hahn, Horst K. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Special Section on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging The segmentation of organs at risk is a crucial and time-consuming step in radiotherapy planning. Good automatic methods can significantly reduce the time clinicians have to spend on this task. Due to its variability in shape and low contrast to surrounding structures, segmenting the parotid gland is challenging. Motivated by the recent success of deep learning, we study the use of two-dimensional (2-D), 2-D ensemble, and three-dimensional (3-D) U-Nets for segmentation. The mean Dice similarity to ground truth is [Formula: see text] for all three models. A patch-based approach for class balancing seems promising for false-positive reduction. The 2-D ensemble and 3-D U-Net are applied to the test data of the 2015 MICCAI challenge on head and neck autosegmentation. Both deep learning methods generalize well onto independent data (Dice 0.865 and 0.88) and are superior to a selection of model- and atlas-based methods with respect to the Dice coefficient. Since appropriate reference annotations are essential for training but often difficult and expensive to obtain, it is important to know how many samples are needed for training. We evaluate the performance after training with different-sized training sets and observe no significant increase in the Dice coefficient for more than 250 training cases. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018-10-01 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6165912/ /pubmed/30276222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.011005 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Special Section on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Hänsch, Annika Schwier, Michael Gass, Tobias Morgas, Tomasz Haas, Benjamin Dicken, Volker Meine, Hans Klein, Jan Hahn, Horst K. Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images |
title | Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images |
title_full | Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images |
title_short | Evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from CT images |
title_sort | evaluation of deep learning methods for parotid gland segmentation from ct images |
topic | Special Section on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.6.1.011005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanschannika evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT schwiermichael evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT gasstobias evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT morgastomasz evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT haasbenjamin evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT dickenvolker evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT meinehans evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT kleinjan evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages AT hahnhorstk evaluationofdeeplearningmethodsforparotidglandsegmentationfromctimages |