Cargando…

Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing

The visual processing capacity of tinnitus patients is worse than normal controls, indicating cross-modal interference. However, the mechanism underlying the tinnitus-modulated visual processing is largely unclear. In order to explore the influence of tinnitus on visual processing, this study used a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhicheng, Gu, Ruolei, Zeng, Xiangli, Qi, Min, Cen, Jintian, Zhang, Shuqi, Gu, Jing, Chen, Qi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01779
_version_ 1783359954427576320
author Li, Zhicheng
Gu, Ruolei
Zeng, Xiangli
Qi, Min
Cen, Jintian
Zhang, Shuqi
Gu, Jing
Chen, Qi
author_facet Li, Zhicheng
Gu, Ruolei
Zeng, Xiangli
Qi, Min
Cen, Jintian
Zhang, Shuqi
Gu, Jing
Chen, Qi
author_sort Li, Zhicheng
collection PubMed
description The visual processing capacity of tinnitus patients is worse than normal controls, indicating cross-modal interference. However, the mechanism underlying the tinnitus-modulated visual processing is largely unclear. In order to explore the influence of tinnitus on visual processing, this study used a signal recognition paradigm to observe whether the tinnitus group would display a significantly longer reaction time in processing the letter symbols (Experiment 1) and emotional faces (Experiment 2) than the control group. Signal detection and signal recognition, which reflect the perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual processing respectively, were manipulated individually in different conditions to identify the pattern of the cross-modal interference of tinnitus. The results showed that the tinnitus group required a significantly prolonged reaction time in detecting and recognizing the letter symbols and emotional faces than the control group; meanwhile, no between-group difference was detected in signal encoding. In addition, any gender- and distress-modulated effects of processing were not found, suggesting the universality of the present findings. Finally, follow-up studies would be needed to explore the neural mechanism behind the decline in speed of visual processing. The positive emotional bias in tinnitus patients also needs to be further verified and discussed. Highlights: - The bottom-up visual processing speed is decreased in tinnitus patients. - Tinnitus primarily interferes with the detection of the visual signals in individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6166004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61660042018-10-12 Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing Li, Zhicheng Gu, Ruolei Zeng, Xiangli Qi, Min Cen, Jintian Zhang, Shuqi Gu, Jing Chen, Qi Front Psychol Psychology The visual processing capacity of tinnitus patients is worse than normal controls, indicating cross-modal interference. However, the mechanism underlying the tinnitus-modulated visual processing is largely unclear. In order to explore the influence of tinnitus on visual processing, this study used a signal recognition paradigm to observe whether the tinnitus group would display a significantly longer reaction time in processing the letter symbols (Experiment 1) and emotional faces (Experiment 2) than the control group. Signal detection and signal recognition, which reflect the perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual processing respectively, were manipulated individually in different conditions to identify the pattern of the cross-modal interference of tinnitus. The results showed that the tinnitus group required a significantly prolonged reaction time in detecting and recognizing the letter symbols and emotional faces than the control group; meanwhile, no between-group difference was detected in signal encoding. In addition, any gender- and distress-modulated effects of processing were not found, suggesting the universality of the present findings. Finally, follow-up studies would be needed to explore the neural mechanism behind the decline in speed of visual processing. The positive emotional bias in tinnitus patients also needs to be further verified and discussed. Highlights: - The bottom-up visual processing speed is decreased in tinnitus patients. - Tinnitus primarily interferes with the detection of the visual signals in individuals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6166004/ /pubmed/30319490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01779 Text en Copyright © 2018 Li, Gu, Zeng, Qi, Cen, Zhang, Gu and Chen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Li, Zhicheng
Gu, Ruolei
Zeng, Xiangli
Qi, Min
Cen, Jintian
Zhang, Shuqi
Gu, Jing
Chen, Qi
Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
title Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
title_full Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
title_fullStr Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
title_full_unstemmed Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
title_short Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
title_sort eyes and ears: cross-modal interference of tinnitus on visual processing
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319490
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01779
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhicheng eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT guruolei eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT zengxiangli eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT qimin eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT cenjintian eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT zhangshuqi eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT gujing eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing
AT chenqi eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing