Cargando…
Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing
The visual processing capacity of tinnitus patients is worse than normal controls, indicating cross-modal interference. However, the mechanism underlying the tinnitus-modulated visual processing is largely unclear. In order to explore the influence of tinnitus on visual processing, this study used a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01779 |
_version_ | 1783359954427576320 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhicheng Gu, Ruolei Zeng, Xiangli Qi, Min Cen, Jintian Zhang, Shuqi Gu, Jing Chen, Qi |
author_facet | Li, Zhicheng Gu, Ruolei Zeng, Xiangli Qi, Min Cen, Jintian Zhang, Shuqi Gu, Jing Chen, Qi |
author_sort | Li, Zhicheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | The visual processing capacity of tinnitus patients is worse than normal controls, indicating cross-modal interference. However, the mechanism underlying the tinnitus-modulated visual processing is largely unclear. In order to explore the influence of tinnitus on visual processing, this study used a signal recognition paradigm to observe whether the tinnitus group would display a significantly longer reaction time in processing the letter symbols (Experiment 1) and emotional faces (Experiment 2) than the control group. Signal detection and signal recognition, which reflect the perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual processing respectively, were manipulated individually in different conditions to identify the pattern of the cross-modal interference of tinnitus. The results showed that the tinnitus group required a significantly prolonged reaction time in detecting and recognizing the letter symbols and emotional faces than the control group; meanwhile, no between-group difference was detected in signal encoding. In addition, any gender- and distress-modulated effects of processing were not found, suggesting the universality of the present findings. Finally, follow-up studies would be needed to explore the neural mechanism behind the decline in speed of visual processing. The positive emotional bias in tinnitus patients also needs to be further verified and discussed. Highlights: - The bottom-up visual processing speed is decreased in tinnitus patients. - Tinnitus primarily interferes with the detection of the visual signals in individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6166004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61660042018-10-12 Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing Li, Zhicheng Gu, Ruolei Zeng, Xiangli Qi, Min Cen, Jintian Zhang, Shuqi Gu, Jing Chen, Qi Front Psychol Psychology The visual processing capacity of tinnitus patients is worse than normal controls, indicating cross-modal interference. However, the mechanism underlying the tinnitus-modulated visual processing is largely unclear. In order to explore the influence of tinnitus on visual processing, this study used a signal recognition paradigm to observe whether the tinnitus group would display a significantly longer reaction time in processing the letter symbols (Experiment 1) and emotional faces (Experiment 2) than the control group. Signal detection and signal recognition, which reflect the perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual processing respectively, were manipulated individually in different conditions to identify the pattern of the cross-modal interference of tinnitus. The results showed that the tinnitus group required a significantly prolonged reaction time in detecting and recognizing the letter symbols and emotional faces than the control group; meanwhile, no between-group difference was detected in signal encoding. In addition, any gender- and distress-modulated effects of processing were not found, suggesting the universality of the present findings. Finally, follow-up studies would be needed to explore the neural mechanism behind the decline in speed of visual processing. The positive emotional bias in tinnitus patients also needs to be further verified and discussed. Highlights: - The bottom-up visual processing speed is decreased in tinnitus patients. - Tinnitus primarily interferes with the detection of the visual signals in individuals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6166004/ /pubmed/30319490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01779 Text en Copyright © 2018 Li, Gu, Zeng, Qi, Cen, Zhang, Gu and Chen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Li, Zhicheng Gu, Ruolei Zeng, Xiangli Qi, Min Cen, Jintian Zhang, Shuqi Gu, Jing Chen, Qi Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing |
title | Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing |
title_full | Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing |
title_fullStr | Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing |
title_short | Eyes and Ears: Cross-Modal Interference of Tinnitus on Visual Processing |
title_sort | eyes and ears: cross-modal interference of tinnitus on visual processing |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319490 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhicheng eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT guruolei eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT zengxiangli eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT qimin eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT cenjintian eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT zhangshuqi eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT gujing eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing AT chenqi eyesandearscrossmodalinterferenceoftinnitusonvisualprocessing |