Cargando…
Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty”
The concept of cognitive frailty has recently been proposed by an International Consensus Group as the presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment [defined using the Clinical Dementia Ratings (CDR)=0.5], without concurrent dementia. However, CDR is difficult to implement and not often avai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30235916 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2018.05.22 |
_version_ | 1783359959506878464 |
---|---|
author | Won, Chang Won Lee, Yunhwan Kim, Sunyoung Yoo, Jinho Kim, Miji Ng, Tze-Pin Kim, Haena Son, Sang Joon |
author_facet | Won, Chang Won Lee, Yunhwan Kim, Sunyoung Yoo, Jinho Kim, Miji Ng, Tze-Pin Kim, Haena Son, Sang Joon |
author_sort | Won, Chang Won |
collection | PubMed |
description | The concept of cognitive frailty has recently been proposed by an International Consensus Group as the presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment [defined using the Clinical Dementia Ratings (CDR)=0.5], without concurrent dementia. However, CDR is difficult to implement and not often available in epidemiologic studies or busy clinical settings, and an alternative to CDR is required. We suggest an alternative definition of cognitive frailty as: 1) physical frailty, 2) more than 1.5 standard deviation below the mean for age-, gender-, and education-adjusted norms on any cognitive function test (e.g., the Montreal Cognitive assessment test, the Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale, verbal learning test, Digit Span, Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, and Frontal Assessment Battery), and 3) no dependency in instrumental activities of daily living. The redefined criteria for cognitive frailty would be more feasible to implement and thus more applicable in epidemiologic studies and busy clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6166025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Neuropsychiatric Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61660252018-10-11 Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” Won, Chang Won Lee, Yunhwan Kim, Sunyoung Yoo, Jinho Kim, Miji Ng, Tze-Pin Kim, Haena Son, Sang Joon Psychiatry Investig Review Article The concept of cognitive frailty has recently been proposed by an International Consensus Group as the presence of physical frailty and cognitive impairment [defined using the Clinical Dementia Ratings (CDR)=0.5], without concurrent dementia. However, CDR is difficult to implement and not often available in epidemiologic studies or busy clinical settings, and an alternative to CDR is required. We suggest an alternative definition of cognitive frailty as: 1) physical frailty, 2) more than 1.5 standard deviation below the mean for age-, gender-, and education-adjusted norms on any cognitive function test (e.g., the Montreal Cognitive assessment test, the Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale, verbal learning test, Digit Span, Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, and Frontal Assessment Battery), and 3) no dependency in instrumental activities of daily living. The redefined criteria for cognitive frailty would be more feasible to implement and thus more applicable in epidemiologic studies and busy clinical settings. Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2018-09 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6166025/ /pubmed/30235916 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2018.05.22 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Won, Chang Won Lee, Yunhwan Kim, Sunyoung Yoo, Jinho Kim, Miji Ng, Tze-Pin Kim, Haena Son, Sang Joon Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” |
title | Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” |
title_full | Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” |
title_fullStr | Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” |
title_short | Modified Criteria for Diagnosing “Cognitive Frailty” |
title_sort | modified criteria for diagnosing “cognitive frailty” |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30235916 http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2018.05.22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wonchangwon modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT leeyunhwan modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT kimsunyoung modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT yoojinho modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT kimmiji modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT ngtzepin modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT kimhaena modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty AT sonsangjoon modifiedcriteriafordiagnosingcognitivefrailty |