Cargando…

Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the clinical treatment of multiple cancers. Recent studies revealed the potential prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients receiving ICIs; however, the results w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Qiaoyun, Liu, Shuxia, Liang, Caixia, Han, Xiaohong, Shi, Yuankai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12815
_version_ 1783359966039506944
author Tan, Qiaoyun
Liu, Shuxia
Liang, Caixia
Han, Xiaohong
Shi, Yuankai
author_facet Tan, Qiaoyun
Liu, Shuxia
Liang, Caixia
Han, Xiaohong
Shi, Yuankai
author_sort Tan, Qiaoyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the clinical treatment of multiple cancers. Recent studies revealed the potential prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients receiving ICIs; however, the results were inconsistent. We conducted a meta‐analysis to identify the prognostic significance of baseline NLR and PLR in cancer patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: We conducted a thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies dealing with the prognostic impact of pretreatment NLR and/or PLR levels in cancer patients treated with ICIs. The clinical outcomes were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seventeen articles involving 2092 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled HRs of PFS and OS for NLR were 1.81(95% CI 1.36–2.41) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.68–3.03), respectively, suggesting that patients with higher baseline NLRs had significantly poorer PFS and OS. Similar results were detected in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. However, no significant relevance was found between PLR and clinical endpoints in patients treated with ICIs (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.88–1.48 for PFS; HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.86–2.12 for OS). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that high pretreatment NLR but not PLR level, as a routinely obtained hematological parameter, is a potential prognostic predictor for poor PFS and OS in cancer patients receiving ICIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6166061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61660612018-10-04 Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis Tan, Qiaoyun Liu, Shuxia Liang, Caixia Han, Xiaohong Shi, Yuankai Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the clinical treatment of multiple cancers. Recent studies revealed the potential prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients receiving ICIs; however, the results were inconsistent. We conducted a meta‐analysis to identify the prognostic significance of baseline NLR and PLR in cancer patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: We conducted a thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies dealing with the prognostic impact of pretreatment NLR and/or PLR levels in cancer patients treated with ICIs. The clinical outcomes were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to investigate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seventeen articles involving 2092 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled HRs of PFS and OS for NLR were 1.81(95% CI 1.36–2.41) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.68–3.03), respectively, suggesting that patients with higher baseline NLRs had significantly poorer PFS and OS. Similar results were detected in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. However, no significant relevance was found between PLR and clinical endpoints in patients treated with ICIs (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.88–1.48 for PFS; HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.86–2.12 for OS). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that high pretreatment NLR but not PLR level, as a routinely obtained hematological parameter, is a potential prognostic predictor for poor PFS and OS in cancer patients receiving ICIs. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018-08-27 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6166061/ /pubmed/30151899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12815 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tan, Qiaoyun
Liu, Shuxia
Liang, Caixia
Han, Xiaohong
Shi, Yuankai
Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis
title Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis
title_full Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis
title_short Pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta‐analysis
title_sort pretreatment hematological markers predict clinical outcome in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12815
work_keys_str_mv AT tanqiaoyun pretreatmenthematologicalmarkerspredictclinicaloutcomeincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitorsametaanalysis
AT liushuxia pretreatmenthematologicalmarkerspredictclinicaloutcomeincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitorsametaanalysis
AT liangcaixia pretreatmenthematologicalmarkerspredictclinicaloutcomeincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitorsametaanalysis
AT hanxiaohong pretreatmenthematologicalmarkerspredictclinicaloutcomeincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitorsametaanalysis
AT shiyuankai pretreatmenthematologicalmarkerspredictclinicaloutcomeincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitorsametaanalysis