Cargando…

Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic significance of and risk factors for solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM) of patients with cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma who und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Yi-Fang, Xu, Mu, Zhong, Li-Ying, Xie, Xiao-Yan, Liu, Zhao-Dong, Yan, Ming-Xing, Yi, Huan, Lin, Dan-Mei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518785827
_version_ 1783360016832528384
author Dai, Yi-Fang
Xu, Mu
Zhong, Li-Ying
Xie, Xiao-Yan
Liu, Zhao-Dong
Yan, Ming-Xing
Yi, Huan
Lin, Dan-Mei
author_facet Dai, Yi-Fang
Xu, Mu
Zhong, Li-Ying
Xie, Xiao-Yan
Liu, Zhao-Dong
Yan, Ming-Xing
Yi, Huan
Lin, Dan-Mei
author_sort Dai, Yi-Fang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic significance of and risk factors for solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM) of patients with cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between January 2003 and December 2010 were analysed retrospectively. Histopathological analysis was used to identify SLNM. Long-term survival and risk factors associated with SLNM were analysed. RESULTS: The study enrolled 302 patients with cervical cancer: 48 with SLNM (SLNM group) and 254 patients with no lymph node metastases (nLNM group). FIGO stage, tumour grade, depth of tumour invasion, uterine body involvement, parametrial involvement and lymphovascular invasion differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that FIGO stage, depth of tumour invasion and lymphovascular invasion were independent factors associated with SLNM. The 5-year survival rates of the SLNM and nLNM groups were 54.2% and 87.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified SLNM as an independent factor affecting survival. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of just one solitary lymph node metastasis significantly worsened the prognosis in patients with cervical carcinoma compared with patients without lymph node metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6166324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61663242018-10-03 Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma Dai, Yi-Fang Xu, Mu Zhong, Li-Ying Xie, Xiao-Yan Liu, Zhao-Dong Yan, Ming-Xing Yi, Huan Lin, Dan-Mei J Int Med Res Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic significance of and risk factors for solitary lymph node metastasis (SLNM) of patients with cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between January 2003 and December 2010 were analysed retrospectively. Histopathological analysis was used to identify SLNM. Long-term survival and risk factors associated with SLNM were analysed. RESULTS: The study enrolled 302 patients with cervical cancer: 48 with SLNM (SLNM group) and 254 patients with no lymph node metastases (nLNM group). FIGO stage, tumour grade, depth of tumour invasion, uterine body involvement, parametrial involvement and lymphovascular invasion differed significantly between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that FIGO stage, depth of tumour invasion and lymphovascular invasion were independent factors associated with SLNM. The 5-year survival rates of the SLNM and nLNM groups were 54.2% and 87.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified SLNM as an independent factor affecting survival. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of just one solitary lymph node metastasis significantly worsened the prognosis in patients with cervical carcinoma compared with patients without lymph node metastases. SAGE Publications 2018-07-01 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6166324/ /pubmed/29963935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518785827 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Research Reports
Dai, Yi-Fang
Xu, Mu
Zhong, Li-Ying
Xie, Xiao-Yan
Liu, Zhao-Dong
Yan, Ming-Xing
Yi, Huan
Lin, Dan-Mei
Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma
title Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma
title_full Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma
title_short Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma
title_sort prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with stages ia2 to iia cervical carcinoma
topic Clinical Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518785827
work_keys_str_mv AT daiyifang prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT xumu prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT zhongliying prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT xiexiaoyan prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT liuzhaodong prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT yanmingxing prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT yihuan prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma
AT lindanmei prognosticsignificanceofsolitarylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithstagesia2toiiacervicalcarcinoma