Cargando…
iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex
SIGNIFICANCE: The response of the pupil to a flash of light, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), is an important measure in optometry and in other fields of medicine that is typically evaluated by qualitative observation. Here we describe a simple, portable, iPhone-based pupillometer that quantifies t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001289 |
_version_ | 1783360082460803072 |
---|---|
author | McAnany, J. Jason Smith, Brandon M. Garland, Amy Kagen, Steven L. |
author_facet | McAnany, J. Jason Smith, Brandon M. Garland, Amy Kagen, Steven L. |
author_sort | McAnany, J. Jason |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIGNIFICANCE: The response of the pupil to a flash of light, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), is an important measure in optometry and in other fields of medicine that is typically evaluated by qualitative observation. Here we describe a simple, portable, iPhone-based pupillometer that quantifies the PLR in real time. PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to describe a novel application that records the PLR and to compare its technical capabilities with a laboratory-based infrared (IR) camera system. METHODS: Pupil sizes were measured from 15 visually normal subjects (age, 19 to 65 years) using an IR camera system and the Sensitometer test. This test elicits pupillary constriction using the iPhone flash, records pupil size using the camera, and provides measurements in real time. Simultaneous recordings were obtained with the Sensitometer test and IR camera, and two measures were calculated: (1) dark-adapted steady-state pupil size and (2) minimum pupil size after the flash. The PLR was defined as the difference between these two measures. Pupil size was also recorded during the redilation phase after the flash. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the limits of agreement between the two methods. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations between the IR and Sensitometer test measures were found for the PLR (r = 0.91, P < .001) and redilation size (r = 0.65, P = .03). Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean PLR difference of 6% between these two methods. The PLR limit of agreement was 14%, indicating that 95% of subjects are expected to have IR and Sensitometer test measurements that differ by 14% or less. Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean redilation size difference of 1% between the two methods; the limit of agreement was 5%. CONCLUSIONS: There is excellent agreement between pupil responses recorded using the Sensitometer test and IR camera. The Sensitometer test provides a highly promising approach for simple, portable, inexpensive pupillary measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6166694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61666942018-10-12 iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex McAnany, J. Jason Smith, Brandon M. Garland, Amy Kagen, Steven L. Optom Vis Sci Original Investigations SIGNIFICANCE: The response of the pupil to a flash of light, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), is an important measure in optometry and in other fields of medicine that is typically evaluated by qualitative observation. Here we describe a simple, portable, iPhone-based pupillometer that quantifies the PLR in real time. PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to describe a novel application that records the PLR and to compare its technical capabilities with a laboratory-based infrared (IR) camera system. METHODS: Pupil sizes were measured from 15 visually normal subjects (age, 19 to 65 years) using an IR camera system and the Sensitometer test. This test elicits pupillary constriction using the iPhone flash, records pupil size using the camera, and provides measurements in real time. Simultaneous recordings were obtained with the Sensitometer test and IR camera, and two measures were calculated: (1) dark-adapted steady-state pupil size and (2) minimum pupil size after the flash. The PLR was defined as the difference between these two measures. Pupil size was also recorded during the redilation phase after the flash. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the limits of agreement between the two methods. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations between the IR and Sensitometer test measures were found for the PLR (r = 0.91, P < .001) and redilation size (r = 0.65, P = .03). Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean PLR difference of 6% between these two methods. The PLR limit of agreement was 14%, indicating that 95% of subjects are expected to have IR and Sensitometer test measurements that differ by 14% or less. Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean redilation size difference of 1% between the two methods; the limit of agreement was 5%. CONCLUSIONS: There is excellent agreement between pupil responses recorded using the Sensitometer test and IR camera. The Sensitometer test provides a highly promising approach for simple, portable, inexpensive pupillary measurements. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-10 2018-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6166694/ /pubmed/30234829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001289 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigations McAnany, J. Jason Smith, Brandon M. Garland, Amy Kagen, Steven L. iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex |
title | iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex |
title_full | iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex |
title_fullStr | iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex |
title_full_unstemmed | iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex |
title_short | iPhone-based Pupillometry: A Novel Approach for Assessing the Pupillary Light Reflex |
title_sort | iphone-based pupillometry: a novel approach for assessing the pupillary light reflex |
topic | Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcananyjjason iphonebasedpupillometryanovelapproachforassessingthepupillarylightreflex AT smithbrandonm iphonebasedpupillometryanovelapproachforassessingthepupillarylightreflex AT garlandamy iphonebasedpupillometryanovelapproachforassessingthepupillarylightreflex AT kagenstevenl iphonebasedpupillometryanovelapproachforassessingthepupillarylightreflex |