Cargando…
Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs
Although physicians learn about new medical technologies from their peers, the magnitude and source of peer influence is unknown. We estimate the effect of peer adoption of three first-in-class medications (dabigatran, sitigliptin, and aliskiren) on physicians’ own adoption of those medications. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30273368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204826 |
_version_ | 1783360120090001408 |
---|---|
author | Donohue, Julie M. Guclu, Hasan Gellad, Walid F. Chang, Chung-Chou H. Huskamp, Haiden A. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Zhang, Ruoxin Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Junker, Stefanie P. Anderson, Timothy Richards-Shubik, Seth |
author_facet | Donohue, Julie M. Guclu, Hasan Gellad, Walid F. Chang, Chung-Chou H. Huskamp, Haiden A. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Zhang, Ruoxin Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Junker, Stefanie P. Anderson, Timothy Richards-Shubik, Seth |
author_sort | Donohue, Julie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although physicians learn about new medical technologies from their peers, the magnitude and source of peer influence is unknown. We estimate the effect of peer adoption of three first-in-class medications (dabigatran, sitigliptin, and aliskiren) on physicians’ own adoption of those medications. We included 11,958 physicians in Pennsylvania prescribing anticoagulant, antidiabetic, and antihypertensive medications. We constructed 4 types of peer networks based on shared Medicare and Medicaid patients, medical group affiliation, hospital affiliation, and medical school/residency training. Instrumental variables analysis was used to estimate the causal effect of peer adoption (fraction of peers in each network adopting the new drug) on physician adoption (prescribing at least the median number prescriptions within 15 months of the new drug’s introduction). We illustrate how physician network position can inform targeting of interventions to physicians by computing a social multiplier. Dabigatran was adopted by 25.2%, sitagliptin by 24.5% and aliskiren by 8.3% of physicians. A 10-percentage point increase in peer adoption in the patient-sharing network led to a 5.90% (SE = 1.50%, p<0.001) increase in physician adoption of dabigatran, 8.32% (SE = 1.51%, p<0.001) increase in sitagliptin, and 7.84% increase in aliskiren adoption (SE = 2.93%, p<0.001). Peer effects through shared hospital affiliation were positive but not significant, and medical group and training network effects were not reliably estimated. Physicians in the top decile of patient-sharing network peers were estimated to have nearly 2-fold stronger influence on their peers’ adoption compared to physicians in the top decile of prescribing volume. Limitations include lack of detailed clinical information and pharmaceutical promotion, variables which may influence physician adoption but which are unlikely to bias our peer effect estimates. Peer adoption, especially by those with whom physicians share patients, strongly influenced physician adoption of new drugs. Our study shows the potential for using information on physician peer networks to improve technology diffusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6166964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61669642018-10-19 Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs Donohue, Julie M. Guclu, Hasan Gellad, Walid F. Chang, Chung-Chou H. Huskamp, Haiden A. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Zhang, Ruoxin Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Junker, Stefanie P. Anderson, Timothy Richards-Shubik, Seth PLoS One Research Article Although physicians learn about new medical technologies from their peers, the magnitude and source of peer influence is unknown. We estimate the effect of peer adoption of three first-in-class medications (dabigatran, sitigliptin, and aliskiren) on physicians’ own adoption of those medications. We included 11,958 physicians in Pennsylvania prescribing anticoagulant, antidiabetic, and antihypertensive medications. We constructed 4 types of peer networks based on shared Medicare and Medicaid patients, medical group affiliation, hospital affiliation, and medical school/residency training. Instrumental variables analysis was used to estimate the causal effect of peer adoption (fraction of peers in each network adopting the new drug) on physician adoption (prescribing at least the median number prescriptions within 15 months of the new drug’s introduction). We illustrate how physician network position can inform targeting of interventions to physicians by computing a social multiplier. Dabigatran was adopted by 25.2%, sitagliptin by 24.5% and aliskiren by 8.3% of physicians. A 10-percentage point increase in peer adoption in the patient-sharing network led to a 5.90% (SE = 1.50%, p<0.001) increase in physician adoption of dabigatran, 8.32% (SE = 1.51%, p<0.001) increase in sitagliptin, and 7.84% increase in aliskiren adoption (SE = 2.93%, p<0.001). Peer effects through shared hospital affiliation were positive but not significant, and medical group and training network effects were not reliably estimated. Physicians in the top decile of patient-sharing network peers were estimated to have nearly 2-fold stronger influence on their peers’ adoption compared to physicians in the top decile of prescribing volume. Limitations include lack of detailed clinical information and pharmaceutical promotion, variables which may influence physician adoption but which are unlikely to bias our peer effect estimates. Peer adoption, especially by those with whom physicians share patients, strongly influenced physician adoption of new drugs. Our study shows the potential for using information on physician peer networks to improve technology diffusion. Public Library of Science 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6166964/ /pubmed/30273368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204826 Text en © 2018 Donohue et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Donohue, Julie M. Guclu, Hasan Gellad, Walid F. Chang, Chung-Chou H. Huskamp, Haiden A. Choudhry, Niteesh K. Zhang, Ruoxin Lo-Ciganic, Wei-Hsuan Junker, Stefanie P. Anderson, Timothy Richards-Shubik, Seth Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
title | Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
title_full | Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
title_fullStr | Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
title_short | Influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
title_sort | influence of peer networks on physician adoption of new drugs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30273368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donohuejuliem influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT gucluhasan influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT gelladwalidf influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT changchungchouh influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT huskamphaidena influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT choudhryniteeshk influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT zhangruoxin influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT lociganicweihsuan influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT junkerstefaniep influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT andersontimothy influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs AT richardsshubikseth influenceofpeernetworksonphysicianadoptionofnewdrugs |