Cargando…
Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery is becoming a common and challenging practice in bariatric centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (R-OAGB/MGB) as a revisional procedure. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2017, data on 21 cons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136 |
_version_ | 1783360233463087104 |
---|---|
author | Noun, Roger Slim, Rita Chakhtoura, Ghassan Gharios, Joseph Chouillard, Elie Tohmé-Noun, Carla |
author_facet | Noun, Roger Slim, Rita Chakhtoura, Ghassan Gharios, Joseph Chouillard, Elie Tohmé-Noun, Carla |
author_sort | Noun, Roger |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery is becoming a common and challenging practice in bariatric centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (R-OAGB/MGB) as a revisional procedure. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2017, data on 21 consecutive patients undergoing R-OAGB/MGB for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedures were prospectively collected and analysed. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 ± 12 years (18–65), and 11 (52.3%) were women. The mean operative time was 96.4 ± 20.9 min (range, 122–80), and the mean postoperative stay was 47.8 ± 7.4 hours (range, 36–73). There were no deaths and no procedure-related complications. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 42.9 ± 6.5 at the time of R-OAGB/MGB to 28.5 ± 4 at the 12-month follow-up. At that time point, the mean percentage of BMI loss (%EBL) and the mean percentage of total body weight loss (%TWL) reached 81.6 ± 0.17% and 35 ± 0.01%, respectively. CONCLUSION: R-OAGB/MGB was technically straightforward, effective, and safe in this at-surgical risk population. R-OAGB/MGB should be added to the armamentarium of revisional bariatric procedures considering its technical aspects and the potential advantage on weight loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6167600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61676002018-10-14 Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results Noun, Roger Slim, Rita Chakhtoura, Ghassan Gharios, Joseph Chouillard, Elie Tohmé-Noun, Carla J Obes Research Article BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery is becoming a common and challenging practice in bariatric centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (R-OAGB/MGB) as a revisional procedure. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2017, data on 21 consecutive patients undergoing R-OAGB/MGB for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedures were prospectively collected and analysed. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 ± 12 years (18–65), and 11 (52.3%) were women. The mean operative time was 96.4 ± 20.9 min (range, 122–80), and the mean postoperative stay was 47.8 ± 7.4 hours (range, 36–73). There were no deaths and no procedure-related complications. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 42.9 ± 6.5 at the time of R-OAGB/MGB to 28.5 ± 4 at the 12-month follow-up. At that time point, the mean percentage of BMI loss (%EBL) and the mean percentage of total body weight loss (%TWL) reached 81.6 ± 0.17% and 35 ± 0.01%, respectively. CONCLUSION: R-OAGB/MGB was technically straightforward, effective, and safe in this at-surgical risk population. R-OAGB/MGB should be added to the armamentarium of revisional bariatric procedures considering its technical aspects and the potential advantage on weight loss. Hindawi 2018-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6167600/ /pubmed/30319821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136 Text en Copyright © 2018 Roger Noun et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Noun, Roger Slim, Rita Chakhtoura, Ghassan Gharios, Joseph Chouillard, Elie Tohmé-Noun, Carla Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results |
title | Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results |
title_full | Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results |
title_fullStr | Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results |
title_full_unstemmed | Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results |
title_short | Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results |
title_sort | resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass as a novel option for revision of restrictive procedures: preliminary results |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nounroger resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults AT slimrita resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults AT chakhtouraghassan resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults AT ghariosjoseph resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults AT chouillardelie resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults AT tohmenouncarla resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults |