Cargando…

Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery is becoming a common and challenging practice in bariatric centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (R-OAGB/MGB) as a revisional procedure. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2017, data on 21 cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noun, Roger, Slim, Rita, Chakhtoura, Ghassan, Gharios, Joseph, Chouillard, Elie, Tohmé-Noun, Carla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136
_version_ 1783360233463087104
author Noun, Roger
Slim, Rita
Chakhtoura, Ghassan
Gharios, Joseph
Chouillard, Elie
Tohmé-Noun, Carla
author_facet Noun, Roger
Slim, Rita
Chakhtoura, Ghassan
Gharios, Joseph
Chouillard, Elie
Tohmé-Noun, Carla
author_sort Noun, Roger
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery is becoming a common and challenging practice in bariatric centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (R-OAGB/MGB) as a revisional procedure. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2017, data on 21 consecutive patients undergoing R-OAGB/MGB for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedures were prospectively collected and analysed. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 ± 12 years (18–65), and 11 (52.3%) were women. The mean operative time was 96.4 ± 20.9 min (range, 122–80), and the mean postoperative stay was 47.8 ± 7.4 hours (range, 36–73). There were no deaths and no procedure-related complications. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 42.9 ± 6.5 at the time of R-OAGB/MGB to 28.5 ± 4 at the 12-month follow-up. At that time point, the mean percentage of BMI loss (%EBL) and the mean percentage of total body weight loss (%TWL) reached 81.6 ± 0.17% and 35 ± 0.01%, respectively. CONCLUSION: R-OAGB/MGB was technically straightforward, effective, and safe in this at-surgical risk population. R-OAGB/MGB should be added to the armamentarium of revisional bariatric procedures considering its technical aspects and the potential advantage on weight loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6167600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61676002018-10-14 Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results Noun, Roger Slim, Rita Chakhtoura, Ghassan Gharios, Joseph Chouillard, Elie Tohmé-Noun, Carla J Obes Research Article BACKGROUND: Revisional surgery is becoming a common and challenging practice in bariatric centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass (R-OAGB/MGB) as a revisional procedure. METHODS: From January 2016 to February 2017, data on 21 consecutive patients undergoing R-OAGB/MGB for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedures were prospectively collected and analysed. RESULTS: Mean age was 39 ± 12 years (18–65), and 11 (52.3%) were women. The mean operative time was 96.4 ± 20.9 min (range, 122–80), and the mean postoperative stay was 47.8 ± 7.4 hours (range, 36–73). There were no deaths and no procedure-related complications. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 42.9 ± 6.5 at the time of R-OAGB/MGB to 28.5 ± 4 at the 12-month follow-up. At that time point, the mean percentage of BMI loss (%EBL) and the mean percentage of total body weight loss (%TWL) reached 81.6 ± 0.17% and 35 ± 0.01%, respectively. CONCLUSION: R-OAGB/MGB was technically straightforward, effective, and safe in this at-surgical risk population. R-OAGB/MGB should be added to the armamentarium of revisional bariatric procedures considering its technical aspects and the potential advantage on weight loss. Hindawi 2018-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6167600/ /pubmed/30319821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136 Text en Copyright © 2018 Roger Noun et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Noun, Roger
Slim, Rita
Chakhtoura, Ghassan
Gharios, Joseph
Chouillard, Elie
Tohmé-Noun, Carla
Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
title Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
title_full Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
title_fullStr Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
title_full_unstemmed Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
title_short Resectional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass as a Novel Option for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Preliminary Results
title_sort resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass as a novel option for revision of restrictive procedures: preliminary results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30319821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4049136
work_keys_str_mv AT nounroger resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults
AT slimrita resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults
AT chakhtouraghassan resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults
AT ghariosjoseph resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults
AT chouillardelie resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults
AT tohmenouncarla resectionaloneanastomosisgastricbypassminigastricbypassasanoveloptionforrevisionofrestrictiveprocedurespreliminaryresults