Cargando…
A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014
BACKGROUND: Consumers, clinicians, policymakers and researchers require high quality evidence to guide decision-making in child health. Though Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) are a well-established source of evidence, little is known about the characteristics of non-Cochrane child-relevant SRs. To...
Autores principales: | Gates, Michelle, Elliott, Sarah A, Johnson, Cydney, Thomson, Denise, Williams, Katrina, Fernandes, Ricardo M, Hartling, Lisa |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0562-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Descriptive analysis of cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews: an update and comparison between 2009 and 2013
por: Crick, Katelynn, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources
por: Hartling, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
por: Bow, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Social Media for the Dissemination of Cochrane Child Health Evidence: Evaluation Study
por: Dyson, Michele P, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011
por: Hartling, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2012)